S Balogun1, T Winzenberg, K Wills, D Scott, G Jones, D Aitken, M L Callisaya. 1. Dr Michele L. Callisaya, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia; Email: Michele.Callisaya@utas.edu.au, Phone: (03) 6226 4785, Fax: (03) 6226 7704.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Purpose: To compare the performance of low muscle mass and function with falls risk, incident fracture and mortality over 10 years. METHODS: 1041 participants (50% women; mean age 63±7.5 years) were prospectively followed for 10 years. Falls risk was measured using the Physiological Profile Assessment, fractures were self-reported and mortality was ascertained from the death registry. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) was assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Four anthropometric: (ALM/height2, ALM/body mass index, ALM/weight×100, a residuals method of ALM on height and total body fat) and four performance-based measures: (handgrip strength, lower-limb muscle strength, upper and lower-limb muscle quality) were examined. Participants in the lowest 20% of the sex-specific distribution for each anthropometric and performance-based measure were classified has having low muscle mass or function. Regression analyses were used to estimate associations between each anthropometric and performance-based measure at baseline and 10-year falls risk, incident fractures and mortality. RESULTS: Mean falls risk z-score at 10 years was 0.64 (SD 1.12), incident fractures and mortality over 10 years were 16% and 14% respectively. All baseline performance-based measures were significantly associated with higher falls risk score at 10 years. Low handgrip (RR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.20) and ALM/body mass index (RR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.08) were the only significant predictors of fracture and mortality respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low handgrip strength, a simple and inexpensive test could be considered in clinical settings for identifying future falls and fractures. ALM/ body mass index could be most suitable in estimating 10-year mortality risk, but requires specialised equipment.
OBJECTIVES: Purpose: To compare the performance of low muscle mass and function with falls risk, incident fracture and mortality over 10 years. METHODS: 1041 participants (50% women; mean age 63±7.5 years) were prospectively followed for 10 years. Falls risk was measured using the Physiological Profile Assessment, fractures were self-reported and mortality was ascertained from the death registry. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) was assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Four anthropometric: (ALM/height2, ALM/body mass index, ALM/weight×100, a residuals method of ALM on height and total body fat) and four performance-based measures: (handgrip strength, lower-limb muscle strength, upper and lower-limb muscle quality) were examined. Participants in the lowest 20% of the sex-specific distribution for each anthropometric and performance-based measure were classified has having low muscle mass or function. Regression analyses were used to estimate associations between each anthropometric and performance-based measure at baseline and 10-year falls risk, incident fractures and mortality. RESULTS: Mean falls risk z-score at 10 years was 0.64 (SD 1.12), incident fractures and mortality over 10 years were 16% and 14% respectively. All baseline performance-based measures were significantly associated with higher falls risk score at 10 years. Low handgrip (RR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.20) and ALM/body mass index (RR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.08) were the only significant predictors of fracture and mortality respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Low handgrip strength, a simple and inexpensive test could be considered in clinical settings for identifying future falls and fractures. ALM/ body mass index could be most suitable in estimating 10-year mortality risk, but requires specialised equipment.
Authors: G Iolascon; M T Giamattei; A Moretti; G Di Pietro; F Gimigliano; R Gimigliano Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Bret H Goodpaster; Seok Won Park; Tamara B Harris; Steven B Kritchevsky; Michael Nevitt; Ann V Schwartz; Eleanor M Simonsick; Frances A Tylavsky; Marjolein Visser; Anne B Newman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Robert R McLean; Michelle D Shardell; Dawn E Alley; Peggy M Cawthon; Maren S Fragala; Tamara B Harris; Anne M Kenny; Katherine W Peters; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Douglas P Kiel; Maria T Vassileva; Qian-Li Xue; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski; Thuy-Tien L Dam Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Shilpa Bhupathiraju; David Wormser; Pei Gao; Stephen Kaptoge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Benjamin Cairns; Rachel Huxley; Chandra Jackson; Grace Joshy; Sarah Lewington; JoAnn Manson; Neil Murphy; Alpa Patel; Jonathan Samet; Mark Woodward; Wei Zheng; Maigen Zhou; Narinder Bansal; Aurelio Barricarte; Brian Carter; James Cerhan; George Smith; Xianghua Fang; Oscar Franco; Jane Green; Jim Halsey; Janet Hildebrand; Keum Jung; Rosemary Korda; Dale McLerran; Steven Moore; Linda O'Keeffe; Ellie Paige; Anna Ramond; Gillian Reeves; Betsy Rolland; Carlotta Sacerdote; Naveed Sattar; Eleni Sofianopoulou; June Stevens; Michael Thun; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Ling Yang; Young Yun; Peter Willeit; Emily Banks; Valerie Beral; Zhengming Chen; Susan Gapstur; Marc Gunter; Patricia Hartge; Sun Jee; Tai-Hing Lam; Richard Peto; John Potter; Walter Willett; Simon Thompson; John Danesh; Frank Hu Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gilles Gouspillou; Richard Godin; Jérome Piquereau; Martin Picard; Mahroo Mofarrahi; Jasmin Mathew; Fennigje M Purves-Smith; Nicolas Sgarioto; Russell T Hepple; Yan Burelle; Sabah N A Hussain Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: B Fougère; M Cesari; H Arai; J Woo; R A Merchant; L Flicker; A Cherubini; J M Bauer; B Vellas; J E Morley Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075