OBJECTIVES: The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) has proposed different methods and cut-off points for the three parameters that define sarcopenia: muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance. Although this facilitates clinical practice, it limits comparability between studies and leads to wide differences in published prevalence rates. The aim of this study was to assess how changes in cut-off points for muscle mass, gait speed and grip strength affected sarcopenia prevalence according to EWGSOP criteria. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of elderly individuals recruited from outpatient clinics (n=298) and nursing homes (n=276). We measured muscle mass, grip strength and gait speed and assessed how changes in cut-off points changed sarcopenia prevalence in both populations. RESULTS: An increase from 5.45 kg/m2 to 6.68 kg/m2 in the muscle mass index for female outpatients and nursing-home residents increased sarcopenia prevalence from 4% to 23% and from 9% to 47%, respectively; for men, for an increase from 7.25 kg/m2 to 8.87 kg/m2, the corresponding increases were from 1% to 22% and from 6% to 41%, respectively. Changes in gait speed and grip strength had a limited impact on sarcopenia prevalence. CONCLUSION: The cut-off points used for muscle mass affect the reported prevalence rates for sarcopenia and, in turn, affect comparability between studies. The main factors influencing the magnitude of the change are muscle mass index distribution in the population and the absolute value of the cut-off points: the same difference between two references (e.g., 7.5 kg/m2 to 7.75 kg/m2 or 7.75 kg/m2 to 8 kg/m2) may produce different changes in prevalence. Changes in cut-off points for gait speed and grip strength had a limited impact on sarcopenia prevalence and on study comparability.
OBJECTIVES: The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) has proposed different methods and cut-off points for the three parameters that define sarcopenia: muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance. Although this facilitates clinical practice, it limits comparability between studies and leads to wide differences in published prevalence rates. The aim of this study was to assess how changes in cut-off points for muscle mass, gait speed and grip strength affected sarcopenia prevalence according to EWGSOP criteria. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of elderly individuals recruited from outpatient clinics (n=298) and nursing homes (n=276). We measured muscle mass, grip strength and gait speed and assessed how changes in cut-off points changed sarcopenia prevalence in both populations. RESULTS: An increase from 5.45 kg/m2 to 6.68 kg/m2 in the muscle mass index for female outpatients and nursing-home residents increased sarcopenia prevalence from 4% to 23% and from 9% to 47%, respectively; for men, for an increase from 7.25 kg/m2 to 8.87 kg/m2, the corresponding increases were from 1% to 22% and from 6% to 41%, respectively. Changes in gait speed and grip strength had a limited impact on sarcopenia prevalence. CONCLUSION: The cut-off points used for muscle mass affect the reported prevalence rates for sarcopenia and, in turn, affect comparability between studies. The main factors influencing the magnitude of the change are muscle mass index distribution in the population and the absolute value of the cut-off points: the same difference between two references (e.g., 7.5 kg/m2 to 7.75 kg/m2 or 7.75 kg/m2 to 8 kg/m2) may produce different changes in prevalence. Changes in cut-off points for gait speed and grip strength had a limited impact on sarcopenia prevalence and on study comparability.
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Francesco Landi; Rosa Liperoti; Domenico Fusco; Simona Mastropaolo; Davide Quattrociocchi; Anna Proia; Andrea Russo; Roberto Bernabei; Graziano Onder Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Ian Janssen; Richard N Baumgartner; Robert Ross; Irwin H Rosenberg; Ronenn Roubenoff Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: N C Htun; K Ishikawa-Takata; A Kuroda; T Tanaka; T Kikutani; S P Obuchi; H Hirano; K Iijima Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Esmee M Reijnierse; Marijke C Trappenburg; Morena J Leter; Gerard Jan Blauw; Sarianna Sipilä; Elina Sillanpää; Marco V Narici; Jean-Yves Hogrel; Gillian Butler-Browne; Jamie S McPhee; Helena Gapeyeva; Mati Pääsuke; Marian A E de van der Schueren; Carel G M Meskers; Andrea B Maier Journal: Gerontology Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 5.140
Authors: Robert R McLean; Michelle D Shardell; Dawn E Alley; Peggy M Cawthon; Maren S Fragala; Tamara B Harris; Anne M Kenny; Katherine W Peters; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Douglas P Kiel; Maria T Vassileva; Qian-Li Xue; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski; Thuy-Tien L Dam Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Dawn E Alley; Michelle D Shardell; Katherine W Peters; Robert R McLean; Thuy-Tien L Dam; Anne M Kenny; Maren S Fragala; Tamara B Harris; Douglas P Kiel; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Stephanie A Studenski; Maria T Vassileva; Peggy M Cawthon Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Francesco Landi; Stéphane M Schneider; Clemente Zúñiga; Hidenori Arai; Yves Boirie; Liang-Kung Chen; Roger A Fielding; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Cornel Sieber; Jeffrey R Stout; Stephanie A Studenski; Bruno Vellas; Jean Woo; Mauro Zamboni; Tommy Cederholm Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2014-09-21 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Gülistan Bahat; Jürgen Bauer; Yves Boirie; Olivier Bruyère; Tommy Cederholm; Cyrus Cooper; Francesco Landi; Yves Rolland; Avan Aihie Sayer; Stéphane M Schneider; Cornel C Sieber; Eva Topinkova; Maurits Vandewoude; Marjolein Visser; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Ariane Steindl; Johannes Leitner; Matthias Schwarz; Karl-Heinz Nenning; Ulrika Asenbaum; Sophie Mayer; Ramona Woitek; Michael Weber; Veronika Schöpf; Anna S Berghoff; Thomas Berger; Georg Widhalm; Daniela Prayer; Matthias Preusser; Julia Furtner Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Reshma Aziz Merchant; Richard Jor Yeong Hui; Sing Cheer Kwek; Meena Sundram; Arthur Tay; Jerome Jayasundram; Matthew Zhixuan Chen; Shu Ee Ng; Li Feng Tan; John E Morley Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2020-07-08
Authors: Heliodoro Alemán-Mateo; Miriam T López-Teros; Roxana E Ruiz-Valenzuela; Maribel Ramírez-Torres; René Urquidez-Romero Journal: Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res Date: 2020-05-31