| Literature DB >> 28717662 |
Pascaline Gaildrat1, Said Lebbah2, Abdellah Tebani1,3, Bénédicte Sudrié-Arnaud3, Isabelle Tostivint4, Guillaume Bollee2, Hélène Tubeuf1,5, Thomas Charles6, Aurelia Bertholet-Thomas7, Alice Goldenberg8, Frederic Barbey9, Alexandra Martins1, Pascale Saugier-Veber1,8, Thierry Frébourg1,8, Bertrand Knebelmann2, Soumeya Bekri1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cystinuria is an autosomal recessive disorder of dibasic amino acid transport in the kidney and the intestine leading to increased urinary cystine excretion and nephrolithiasis. Two genes, SLC3A1 and SLC7A9, coding respectively for rBAT and b0,+AT, account for the genetic basis of cystinuria.Entities:
Keywords: Cystinuria; SLC3A1; SLC7A9; exonic splicing regulatory elements; large‐scale rearrangements; splicing mutations
Year: 2017 PMID: 28717662 PMCID: PMC5511796 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
Figure 1Effect on splicing of selected variants located in and genes, assessed using a functional minigene assay. (A) Schematic representation of the pCAS2‐/ minigene used in the splicing reporter assay. Boxes indicate exons, whereas lines in between represent introns. The minigenes were generated by inserting a genomic fragment, containing the or exon of interest (gray box), as well as part of the upstream and downstream flanking intronic sequences (thick lines), into the intron of the minigene using the BamHI and MluI restriction sites. Expression of the minigenes is driven by the CMV promoter. Arrows above the minigene exons A and B (white boxes) indicate the positions of primers used in RT‐PCR analysis. (B–F) Analysis of the splicing pattern of the wild‐type and mutant pCAS2‐/ minigenes for the selected variants. Wild‐type (WT) and mutant pCAS‐2 / constructs were transiently expressed in HeLa cells by transfection. The splicing patterns of the minigene transcripts were then analyzed by RT‐PCR as described under Materials and Methods. The image shows the electrophoresis on a 2% agarose ethidium bromide‐stained gel of the RT‐PCR products obtained for each minigene. The identities of the RT‐PCR products, with the inclusion (+) or the skipping (Δ) of the exon are indicated on the right.
SLC3A1 sequence variants
| Variant type | Position | Nucleotide change | Predicted protein | Alleles | Patients | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missense | Exon 1 | c.257G>A | p.(Arg86Gln) | 1 | 1 | Novel |
| Exon 1 | c.371A>G | p.(Tyr124Cys) | 1 | 1 | Font‐Llitjos et al. ( | |
| Exon 2 | c.503C>T | p.(Ser168Leu) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 2 | c.535G>T | p.(Asp179Tyr) | 2 | 2 | Skopkova, et al., ( | |
| Exon 2 | c.566C>T | p.(Thr189Met) | 2 | 2 | Font‐Llitjos et al. ( | |
| Exon 2 | c.595G>C | p.(Ala199Pro) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 3 | c.647C>T | p.(Thr216Met) | 16 | 10 | Bisceglia et al. ( | |
| Exon 3 | c.647C>G | p.(Thr216Agr) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 3 | c.763T>G | p.(Trp255Gly) | 2 | 2 | Novel | |
| Exon 4 | c.789T>G | p.(Ser263Arg) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 4 | c.851A>G | p.(Asp284Gly) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 6 | c.1051A>G | p.(Thr351Ala) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 6 | c.1094G>T | p.(Arg365Leu) | 1 | 1 | Albers, et al., ( | |
| Exon 7 | c.1144G>T | p.(Gly382Trp) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 7 | c.1190A>G | p.(Tyr397Cys) | 3 | 2 | Eggermann, ( | |
| Exon 7 | c.1318T>C | p.(Trp440Arg) | 2 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 8 | c.1354C>T | p.(Arg452Trp) | 4 | 4 | Endsley, et al., ( | |
| Exon 8 | c.1364C>T | p.(Ser455Leu) | 2 | 2 | Font‐Llitjos et al. ( | |
| Exon 8 | c.1367G>A | p.(Arg456His) | 2 | 1 | Font‐Llitjos et al. ( | |
| Exon 8 | c.1400T>C | p.(Met467Thr) | 27 | 25 | Calonge et al. ( | |
| Exon 8 | c.1400T>A | p.(Met467Lys) | 2 | 2 | Calonge et al. ( | |
| Exon 9 | c.1518G>C | p.(Lys506Asn) | 2 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 9 | c.1527G>A | p.(Met509Ile) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 9 | c.1529A>C | p.(Gln510Pro) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 9 | c.1607T>G | p.(Val536Gly) | 2 | 2 | Gitomer, et al., (1998) | |
| Exon 10 | c.1640C>G | p.(Ser547Trp) | 1 | 1 | Bisceglia, et al., ( | |
| Exon 10 | c.1684G>C | p.(Glu562Gln) | 1 | 1 | Brauers and Eggermann, ( | |
| Exon 10 | c.1701G>T | p.(Arg567Ser) | 1 | 1 | Brauers and Eggermann, ( | |
| Exon 10 | c.1796T>C | p.(Phe599Ser) | 1 | 1 | Harnevik et al. ( | |
| Nonsense | Exon 1 | c.163C>T | p.(Gln55*) | 1 | 1 | Novel |
| Exon 2 | c.464T>G | p.(Leu155*) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 4 | c.792G>A | p.(Trp264* | 2 | 2 | Chatzikyriakidou et al. ( | |
| Exon 4 | c.808C>T | p.(Arg270*) | 7 | 5 | Pras et al. ( | |
| Exon 6 | c.1134C>A | p.(Tyr378*) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 8 | c.1352C>G | p.(Ser451*) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 9 | c.1459G>T | p.(Gly487*) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 10 | c.2011C>T | p.(Arg671*) | 1 | 1 | Novel |
Variants located in the canonical intronic splice site sequences.
Variants with an impact on splicing in minigene assay (this study).
Predicted consequence at the protein level without taking into account the impact of the variant on splicing.
SLC7A9 sequence variants
| Mutation type | Position | Variant (nucleotide change) | Predicted protein | Alleles | Patients | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missense | Exon 3 | c.131T>C | p.(Ile44Thr) | 1 | 1 | Leclerc, et al., ( |
| Exon 4 | c.313G>A | P.(Gly105Arg) | 14 | 11 | Feliubadalo, et al., ( | |
| Exon 4 | c.368C>T | p.(Thr123Met) | 1 | 1 | Font et al. ( | |
| Exon 4 | c.380T>C | p.(Ile127Thr) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 5 | c.508G>A | p.(Val170Met) | 1 | 1 | Feliubadalo, et al., ( | |
| Exon 5 | c.511C>G | p.(Arg171Gly) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Exon 5 | c.517G>C | p.(Gly173Arg) | 1 | 1 | Lee, et al., ( | |
| Exon 5 | c.544G>A | p.(Ala182Thr) | 3 | 3 | Feliubadalo, et al., ( | |
| Exon 5 | c.562G>A | p.(Val188Met) | 1 | 1 | Font‐Llitjos et al. ( | |
| Exon 10 | c.992C>T | p.(Ala331Val) | 2 | 2 | Botzenhart, et al., ( | |
| Exon 10 | c.997C>T | p.(Arg333Trp) | 2 | 1 | Font et al. ( | |
| Exon 11 | c.1166C>T | p.(Thr389Met) | 1 | 1 | Wong et al. ( | |
| Small deletion | Exon 4 | c.285del | P.(Glu96Serfs*5) | 1 | 1 | Novel |
| Exon 4 | c.414_415del | p.(Pro139Leufs*69) | 1 | 1 | Wong et al. ( | |
| Small insertion | Exon 6 | c.614dup | p.(Asn206Glufs*3) | 5 | 4 | Leclerc, et al., ( |
| Exon 12 | c.1393dup | P.(Ile465Asnfs*23) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Deletion‐Insertion | Exon 3 | c.91delinsTGTGAT | p.(Gly31Cysfs*61) | 1 | 1 | Novel |
| Splicing | Exon 3 | c.120G>A | p.(Val40=) | 1 | 1 | Wong et al. ( |
| Exon 3 | c.209C>T | p.(Ala70Val) | 1 | 1 | Font et al. | |
| Intron 5 | c.604+2T>C | p.(?) | 1 | 1 | Font‐Llitjos et al. ( | |
| Exon 10 | c.1032C>T | p.(Ile344=) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Intron 10 | c.1074+2T>C | p.(?) | 1 | 1 | Novel | |
| Intron 12 | c.1399+3_1399+6del | p.(?) | 1 | 1 | Font et al. ( | |
| Large deletion | Exon 10 | c.(977+1_978‐1)_(1074+1_1075‐1)del | p.(Leu327Valfs*3) | 1 | 1 | Novel |
| Exon 12 | c.(1224+1_1225‐1)_(1399+1_1400‐1)del | p.(Val409Serfs*10) | 2 | 2 | Font‐Llitjos et al. ( |
Variants located in the canonical intronic splice site sequences.
Variants with an impact on splicing in minigene assay (this study).
Predicted consequences at the protein level without taking into account the impact of the variant on splicing.
Bioinformatics predictions of the variant effect on splicing
| Gene | Variant | Position | Splice site (MaxEntScan) (Wt → Var) | ESR (ΔtESRseq) (Var vs. Wt) | Effect on splicing (Minigene) | Predicted consequences on RNA and Protein |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| c.1011G>A | Last base of exon 5 | Reference 5′ ss: 6.866 → 0 | n.a. | Exon 5 skipping (major) | r.892_1011del, p.Glu_Pro337del |
| c.1617+5G>A | +5 intron 9 | Reference 5′ ss: 9.1 → 2.3 | n.a. | Exon 5 del 21 nt (minor) | r.991_1011del, p.Val331_Pro337del | |
| Exon 9 skipping (full) | r.1501_1617, p.Asn501_Asp539del | |||||
|
| c.120G>A | +33 exon 3 | Creation 3′ ss: 0 → 6.6 | −2.9 | Exon 3 skipping (major) | r.88_235del, p.Leu30Valfs*11 |
| c.209C>T | −27 exon 3 | No change | −1.8 | Exon 3 skipping (major) | r.88_235del, p.Leu30Valfs*11 | |
| c.225C>T1 | −11 exon 3 | No change | −2.2 | Exon 3 skipping | r.88_235del, p.Leu30Valfs*11 | |
|
| −43 in exon 10 | No change | −2.6 | Exon 10 skipping (full) | r.978_1074del, p.Leu327Valfs*3 | |
| c.1399+3_+6del | +3_+6 in intron 12 | Reference 5′ ss : 10.1 → 0 | n.a. | Exon 12 skipping (full) | r.1225_1399del, p.Val409Serfs*10 |
Wt, wild‐type; Var, variant; n.a., not applicable; ss, splice site; ESR, exonic splicing regulatory elements.
Kummer et al. (2014).
Figure 2Schematic representation of large‐scale rearrangements in ,,, and genes. Genes are written on top of the arrows indicating the direction of the transcription. The exons are indicated (squares). (A) Schematic representation of 11 deletions in the 2p21 locus. (B) Schematic representation of 11 deletions in the gene. (C) Schematic representation of two deletions in the gene.
Figure 3Genealogic trees of four families. (A) Family . A1 allele: c.163C>T – p.(Gln55*); A2 allele= c.(891+1_892‐1)_(1617+1_1618‐1)dup – p.(?); B1 allele= c.544G>A – p.(Ala182Thr). (B) Family . A1 allele: c.647C>T – p.(Thr216Met); A2 allele: c.(765+1_766‐1)_(1011+1_1012‐1)dup ‐ p.(Asp338Leufs*80); B1 allele: c.26G>A – p.(Arg9Gln). This missense variant is not predicted to be pathogenic (Table S3). (C) Family . A1 allele: c.566C>T – p.(Thr189Met); B1 allele: c.614dup – p.(Asn206Glufs*3). (D) Family . A1 allele: c.1500+1G>T – p.(?); A2 allele: c.(?_1)_; NM_024766.4 c.(311+1_?)del ‐ p.(?); A3 allele: c.1134C>A ‐ p.(Tyr378*). A denotes NM_000341; B denotes NM_014270.
Phenotype according to sex and genotype
| All ( | Male ( | Female ( | AA ( | BB ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at first symptoms | Number | 97 | 52 | 45 | 73 | 20 |
| Median | 17 (0–57) | 17 (0–57) | 17 (2–40) | 17 (0–57) | 12 (1–40) | |
| Age at diagnosis | Number | 98 | 51 | 48 | 76 | 19 |
| Median | 18 (0–66) | 21 (0–66) | 18 (0–49) | 21 (0–66) | 14 (0–41) | |
| Stone activity | Number | 96 | 52 | 44 | 72 | 20 |
| Median | 0.31 (0.00–2.67) | 0.34 (0.00–2.67) | 0.29 (0.00–2.09) | 0.36 (0.00–2.67) | 0.15 (0.00–1.25) | |
| Follow‐up | Number | 97 | 52 | 43 | 71 | 20 |
| Median | 18 (1–59) | 21 (1–59) | 18 (1–52) | 17 (1–52) | 22 (1–59) | |
| Cystinuria (μmol/mmol creat) | Number | 89 | 48 | 41 | 65 | 21 |
| Median | 249 (65–958) | 218 (72–896) | 290 (65–958) | 248 (65–958) | 264 (72–597) | |
| Age at last follow‐up | Median | 36 (2–86) | 37 (2–86) | 35 (3–83) | 36 (3–86) | 38 (2–67) |
P = 0.04 (BB vs. AA).
P = 0.004 (Females vs. Males).
Figure 4Genotype distribution of 99 patients. Seventy‐four patients with genotype A (70 AA, 3 AAA, 1 AAB), 22 with genotype B, 1 A0 and 2 B0 genotypes.