Literature DB >> 28717540

Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is feasible in morbidly obese patients.

Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir1, Mohammad Ghasem Mohseni1, Seyed Reza Hosseini1, Alborz Salavati1, Hossein Ganjali1, Mohammad Ali Fallah1, Hamed Rezaei1, Seyed Saeed Modaresi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Regarding technical difficulties that obese body habitus might impose to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) success and higher risk of peri-operative complications in this group of patients, we decided to retrospectively gather data from our patients during past 8 years to determine the stone free and complication rates.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2007-December 2015, seventy-eight obese patients with body mass index over 35 who had indication for PNL including stones larger than 2 cm in pelvi-calyceal system or smaller extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) resistant stones or who were not a fit candidate for ESWL due to increased skin to target distance, with no contraindication of PNL (including bleeding diathesis, inability to be positioned in prone) were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to group 1 (standard PNL with nephrostomy and ureteral stent) or group 2 (totally tubeless PNL with no ureteral stent and no nephrostomy). The outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The transfusion rate, operation time, and the hemoglobin drop were same across the groups (p>0.05). Total analgesic use was equivalent of 33.8 vs. 14.7 mgs of morphine sulfate (18-77 mg) and was significantly lower in total tubeless group (p=0.001). Return to normal activity was described as total number of in-patient and outpatient days from time of admission to the point which the patients returns to normal life activity such as going to job or school and was 19.4 vs. 9.3 days (6-30 days, p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Totally tubeless PNL in obese subjects would have lower analgesic use and return to normal activity versus standard PNL. Totally tubeless PNL is recommended for obese patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obesity; outcomes; percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28717540      PMCID: PMC5503435          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.03185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  12 in total

1.  The effect of fat and nonfat components of the skin-to-stone distance on shockwave lithotripsy outcome.

Authors:  Fayez T Hammad; Anita Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Comparing Bleeding Complications of Double and Single Access Totally Tubeless PCNL: Is It Safe to Obtain More Accesses?

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir; Reza Elmimehr; Seyed Saeed Modaresi; Alborz Salavati
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Feasibility of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy under the age of 14 years: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Seyed Mohamad Kazem Aghamir; Alborz Salavati; Mehdi Aloosh; Hasan Farahmand; Alipasha Meysamie; Gholamreza Pourmand
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Does body mass index impact the outcomes of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Nicholas J Kuntz; Andreas Neisius; Gastón M Astroza; Matvey Tsivian; Muhammad W Iqbal; Ramy Youssef; Michael N Ferrandino; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole renal stone using subcostal access.

Authors:  Seyyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir; Seyed Saeed Modaresi; Mehdi Aloosh; Ali Tajik
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in men: new insights after 14 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Eric N Taylor; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Madhu Sudan Agrawal; Mayank Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

8.  Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery in obese patients.

Authors:  Ronald M Yang; Gary C Bellman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Impact of body mass index on cost and clinical outcomes after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  Aditya Bagrodia; Amit Gupta; Jay D Raman; Karim Bensalah; Margaret S Pearle; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Large tube, small tube, tubeless, or totally tubeless?

Authors:  Madhu S Agrawal; Mayank Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Research progress of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Chao Wei; Yucong Zhang; Gaurab Pokhrel; Xiaming Liu; Jiahua Gan; Xiao Yu; Zhangqun Ye; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.370

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.