Literature DB >> 28716704

[Psychosocial working conditions of physician assistants: results from a qualitative study on occupational stress, resources, possible approaches to prevention and intervention needs].

Patricia Vu-Eickmann1, Adrian Loerbroks2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have documented adverse psychosocial working conditions among health care staff. Working conditions may not only impair the health outcomes of this professional group, but can also affect the quality of care they deliver to patients. Previous work stress research has mainly focused on physicians and nurses. Comparable evidence remains limited, however, for physician assistants (Medizinische Fachangestellte, MFAs), who represent the largest professional group in German primary care. This study aimed to gain insights into work stressors and resources experienced by MFAs and to explore both possible approaches to prevention and intervention needs.
METHODS: Participants were recruited from a criterion-based sample of medical practices in and around the city of Düsseldorf (Germany) and with assistance provided by the Medical Staff Association (VMF e. V.). In total, 26 qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted (11/2015-02/2016), transcribed and content analyzed using MaxQDA.
RESULTS: MFAs reported a high workload and unforeseeable incidents as salient occupational stressors. Additional stressors included interpersonal relationship problems with superiors and a lack of social support from colleagues. At the same time though, support from superiors and colleagues can provide a key resource for coping with work stressors. Furthermore, social interactions with patients and diversified tasks were perceived as supportive professional resources. Possible approaches to prevention were exclusively seen to operate at the organizational level. The perceived need for intervention primarily concerned adequate wages and appreciation from superiors and society.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician assistants described their working conditions as being characterized by high demands, low job control and low rewards. We suggest basic approaches for employers to improve the working experience of MFAs, which may represent the starting point for further research efforts to develop preventive measures.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gesundheitsberufe; Gesundheitswesen; Versorgungsqualität; health care staff; psychosocial strains; psychosoziale Belastungen; qualitative Methoden; qualitative methods; quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28716704     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  10 in total

1.  The Relationship of Medical Assistants' Work Engagement with Their Concerns of Having Made an Important Medical Error: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Adrian Loerbroks; Patricia Vu-Eickmann; Annegret Dreher; Viola Mambrey; Jessica Scharf; Peter Angerer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Associations of psychosocial working conditions with health outcomes, quality of care and intentions to leave the profession: results from a cross-sectional study among physician assistants in Germany.

Authors:  Patricia Vu-Eickmann; Jian Li; Andreas Müller; Peter Angerer; Adrian Loerbroks
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Desired improvements of working conditions among medical assistants in Germany: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jessica Scharf; Patricia Vu-Eickmann; Jian Li; Andreas Müller; Stefan Wilm; Peter Angerer; Adrian Loerbroks
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.646

4.  Work-Related Intervention Needs and Potential Occupational Outcomes among Medical Assistants: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jessica Scharf; Patricia Vu-Eickmann; Jian Li; Andreas Müller; Peter Angerer; Adrian Loerbroks
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jeannette Weber; Stefanie Skodda; Thomas Muth; Peter Angerer; Adrian Loerbroks
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Work-Related Intervention Needs of Medical Assistants and How to Potentially Address Them according to Supervising General Practitioners: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Jessica Scharf; Patricia Vu-Eickmann; Peter Angerer; Andreas Müller; Jürgen In der Schmitten; Adrian Loerbroks
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Humor as a Multifaceted Resource in Healthcare: An Initial Qualitative Analysis of Perceived Functions and Conditions of Medical Assistants' Use of Humor in their Everyday Work and Education.

Authors:  Julia Raecke; René T Proyer
Journal:  Int J Appl Posit Psychol       Date:  2022-10-13

8.  The Health Behaviour of German Outpatient Caregivers in Relation to Their Working Conditions: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Natascha Mojtahedzadeh; Elisabeth Rohwer; Felix Alexander Neumann; Albert Nienhaus; Matthias Augustin; Birgit-Christiane Zyriax; Volker Harth; Stefanie Mache
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Exploring Drivers of Work-Related Stress in General Practice Teams as an Example for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Protocol for an Integrated Ethnographic Approach of Social Research Methods.

Authors:  Esther Rind; Sigrid Emerich; Christine Preiser; Elena Tsarouha; Monika A Rieger
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2020-02-11

10.  Work-Related Psychosocial Demands and Resources in General Practice Teams in Germany. A Team-Based Ethnography.

Authors:  Elena Tsarouha; Christine Preiser; Birgitta Weltermann; Florian Junne; Tanja Seifried-Dübon; Felicitas Stuber; Sigrid Hartmann; Andrea Wittich; Monika A Rieger; Esther Rind
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.