Literature DB >> 28716197

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of antimicrobial usage in white veal calves in France.

N Jarrige1, G Cazeau2, E Morignat2, M Chanteperdrix3, E Gay2.   

Abstract

The development of antimicrobial resistance has made it necessary to measure antimicrobial usage in animal production sectors. France is a major European producer of white veal calves, but few data were previously available for that sector, even though these young animals are particularly susceptible to infection and considered as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 186 batches of French calves to estimate the exposure of white veal calves to antimicrobials and identify the potential risk factors related to antimicrobial usage. An indicator of calf exposure was calculated as a count of the number of antimicrobial treatments per calf. The indicator was based on veterinary prescriptions (products, quantity dispensed and dosage prescribed) and the estimated weight of calves at treatment, using the dates of treatment collected from farm registers. The study showed that calves were exposed to an average of 8.55 antimicrobial treatments (SD: 2.21, range: 2.75-15.86) over the five to six months of the fattening process. Group treatments were predominant (95.8%) and administered by the oral route. The "starting treatments", given during the first two weeks of the fattening period, were administered systematically (to all the calves in all the farms) and accounted for a third of all treatments. Tetracyclines, polypeptides and macrolides were the most widely used antimicrobials, with respectively 4.32, 1.59 and 1.01 treatments per calf. Only rare uses of 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, considered as critically important in human medicine, were reported. Despite low variability of exposure between farms, a linear mixed-effects model highlighted a higher variability between farmers (ICC=0.14) or veterinarians (ICC=0.12), than between integrators (ICC=0.06). The number of calves per pen, introduced as a fixed effect in the model, was also significant: calves housed in pens of 6-10 and fed in buckets had on average 2.55 more antimicrobial treatments per calf than calves housed in pairs with the same feeding system. The model also highlighted an increase of 1.48 treatments per calf for farms with more than five percent of mortality, versus those with two percent or less. The present study showed that antimicrobial treatments are numerous in veal calf fattening farms, particularly at the arrival of the animals. Taking into account the development of resistance to antimicrobials, the necessity and the effectiveness of some of these treatments should be re-evaluated.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial; Exposure; Indicator; Prescription; Usage; Veal calves

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28716197     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  13 in total

1.  Interplay between Bacterial Clones and Plasmids in the Spread of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the Gut: Lessons from a Temporal Study in Veal Calves.

Authors:  Méril Massot; Pierre Châtre; Bénédicte Condamine; Véronique Métayer; Olivier Clermont; Jean-Yves Madec; Erick Denamur; Marisa Haenni
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 5.005

Review 2.  Antimicrobial Usage in Animal Production: A Review of the Literature with a Focus on Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Nguyen V Cuong; Pawin Padungtod; Guy Thwaites; Juan J Carrique-Mas
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-15

3.  Veterinary peer study groups as a method of continuous education-A new approach to identify and address factors associated with antimicrobial prescribing.

Authors:  Valerie-Beau Pucken; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Manuela Gerber; Corina Salis Gross; Michèle Bodmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Temporal dynamics of the fecal microbiota in veal calves in a 6-month field trial.

Authors:  Méril Massot; Marisa Haenni; Thu Thuy Nguyen; Jean-Yves Madec; France Mentré; Erick Denamur
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-09-15

5.  The Welfare of Beef Cattle in the Scientific Literature From 1990 to 2019: A Text Mining Approach.

Authors:  Elena Nalon; Barbara Contiero; Flaviana Gottardo; Giulio Cozzi
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-11

6.  Effect of Farm Management Practices on Morbidity and Antibiotic Usage on Calf Rearing Farms.

Authors:  Atte Sandelin; Outi Hälli; Heidi Härtel; Tuomas Herva; Liisa Kaartinen; Erja Tuunainen; Helena Rautala; Timo Soveri; Heli Simojoki
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18

7.  Cross-Sectional Survey of Prophylactic and Metaphylactic Antimicrobial Use in Layer Poultry Farming in Cameroon: A Quantitative Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mohamed Moctar Mouliom Mouiche; Frank Dupleix Khalen Wouembe; Serge Eugene Mpouam; Frédéric Moffo; Michael Djuntu; Claude Michel Wombou Toukam; Jean Marc Feussom Kameni; Ndode Herman Okah-Nnane; Julius Awah-Ndukum
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-18

8.  Using routinely collected data to evaluate risk factors for mortality of veal calves.

Authors:  I M G A Santman-Berends; A J G de Bont-Smolenaars; L Roos; A G J Velthuis; G van Schaik
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  A Retrospective, Observational Study on Antimicrobial Drug Use in Beef Fattening Operations in Northwestern Italy and Evaluation of Risk Factors Associated with Increased Antimicrobial Usage.

Authors:  Isabella Nicola; Giovanni Gallina; Giulia Cagnotti; Paola Gianella; Flaminia Valentini; Antonio D'Angelo; Claudio Bellino
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Prevalence of BRD-Related Viral Pathogens in the Upper Respiratory Tract of Swiss Veal Calves.

Authors:  Eveline Studer; Lutz Schönecker; Mireille Meylan; Dimitri Stucki; Ronald Dijkman; Melle Holwerda; Anna Glaus; Jens Becker
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.