Literature DB >> 28716164

Collagen matrix as an inlay in endoscopic skull base reconstruction.

G M Oakley1, J M Christensen2, M Winder2, B P Jonker2, A Davidson3, T Steel4, C Teo5, R J Harvey2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multi-layer reconstruction has become standard in endoscopic skull base surgery. The inlay component used can vary among autografts, allografts, xenografts and synthetics, primarily based on surgeon preference. The short- and long-term outcomes of collagen matrix in skull base reconstruction are described.
METHODS: A case series of patients who underwent endoscopic skull base reconstruction with collagen matrix inlay were assessed. Immediate peri-operative outcomes (cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, ventriculitis, intracranial bleeding, epistaxis, seizures) and delayed complications (delayed healing, meningoencephalocele, prolapse of reconstruction, delayed cerebrospinal fluid leak, ascending meningitis) were examined.
RESULTS: Of 120 patients (51.0 ± 17.5 years, 41.7 per cent female), peri-operative complications totalled 12.7 per cent (cerebrospinal fluid leak, 3.3 per cent; meningitis, 3.3 per cent; other intracranial infections, 2.5 per cent; intracranial bleeding, 1.7 per cent; epistaxis, 1.7 per cent; and seizures, 0 per cent). Delayed complications did not occur in any patients.
CONCLUSION: Collagen matrix is an effective inlay material. It provides robust long-term separation between sinus and cranial cavities, and avoids donor site morbidity, but carries additional cost.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collagen; Endoscopic Surgery; Skull Base

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28716164     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215117001499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Small Intestinal Submucosal Graft and Autologous Tissue in Prevention of CSF leak after Posterior Fossa Craniotomy.

Authors:  Douglas J Totten; Nauman F Manzoor; Kristen L Yancey; Robert J Yawn; David S Haynes; Alejandro Rivas
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-03-12

2.  Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Dorismond; Griffin D Santarelli; Brian D Thorp; Adam J Kimple; Charles S Ebert; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-07

3.  Clinical Impact of Hydroxyapatite on the Outcome of Skull Base Reconstruction for Intraoperative High-Flow CSF Leak: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Shin Heon Lee; Chang-Min Ha; Sang Duk Hong; Jung Won Choi; Ho Jun Seol; Do-Hyun Nam; Jung-Il Lee; Doo-Sik Kong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Endoscopic Reconstruction of Skull Base Defects Using Tutoplast.

Authors:  Ghassan Alokby; Kholoud Mohammed AlAmari; Jamal Mohammed S Abdullah; Mohammed Tayed Hazazi; Fawaz Makki
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2021-04-09

Review 5.  Vascular pedicled flaps for skull base defect reconstruction.

Authors:  Wade R Gutierrez; Douglas M Bennion; Jarrett E Walsh; Scott R Owen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-15

6.  Effects of cruciate embedding fascia-bone flap technique on grade II-III cerebral spinal fluid leak in endoscopic endonasal surgery.

Authors:  WenJi Zhao; Gang Yang; RuiChun Li; Gang Huo; Dong Gao; MingChuan Cao; XiaoShu Wang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.030

7.  Modification of the Fetal Profile Line to Measure Reversal of Forehead Slope after Early Repair of Frontoethmoidal Encephalocele.

Authors:  Paramita Das; Martin Lacey; Daniel J Guillaume
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-01-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.