| Literature DB >> 28716148 |
Yasuo Shiohama1,2, Tadasuke Naito1, Toshio Matsuzaki3, Reiko Tanaka4, Takeaki Tomoyose5, Hiroshi Takashima3, Takuya Fukushima6, Yuetsu Tanaka4, Mineki Saito7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Detection of specific immune responses against cancer/testis antigen NY-ESO-1 was recently reported in patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) and human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1)-infected asymptomatic carriers (ACs). However, the relationship of the responses with the HTLV-1 proviral load (PVL) and the levels of viral gene expression remain unclear.Entities:
Keywords: ATL; ELISA; HAM/TSP; HTLV-1; Monoclonal antibody; NY-ESO-1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28716148 PMCID: PMC5512893 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-017-0802-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Fig. 1Detection of NY-ESO-1-specific antibodies in the plasma of HTLV-1-infected individuals with different clinical status Plasma anti-NY-ESO-1 antibody was detectable in 13.7% (7/51) of ACs, 29.2% (38/130) of patients with HTLV-1 associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP), and 18.9% (10/53) of patients with ATL. No humoral response against NY-ESO-1 was detected in 22 healthy uninfected controls (NCs). The plasma levels of anti-NY-ESO-1 was significantly higher in patients with HAM/TSP than in patients with ATL and ACs. NY-ESO-1 signals were evaluated by calculating the difference in absorbance values between the wells containing NY-ESO-1 and the wells containing PBS. Broken lines indicate the cut-off values (mean + 3 standard deviations of the control samples)
Fig. 2Plasma anti-NY-ESO-1 antibody titers between aggressive and indolent ATL Plasma anti-NY-ESO-1 antibody titers were compared between aggressive (acute or lymphoma type) and indolent (chronic or smoldering) clinical subtypes of ATL by ELISA. The mean optical density value ratios were not significantly different between aggressive and indolent ATL (p = 0.738 by Mann-Whitney U test)
Results of rank correlation test between clinical status and virological parameters
|
|
| Proviral loadc |
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | r | p | r | p | r | p | |
| ATL | 0.045 | 0.764 | −0.145 | 0.327 | 0.250 | 0.083 | −0.120 | 0.411 | −0.151 | 0.305 |
| HAM/TSP | 0.180 | 0.069 | 0.096 | 0.343 | 0.092 | 0.319 | 0.159 | 0.116 | 0.022 | 0.828 |
| ACs | 0.148 | 0.325 | −0.011 | 0.942 | −0.062 | 0.672 | 0.206 | 0.169 | −0.012 | 0.934 |
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients
aHTLV-1 HBZ mRNA load = value of HBZ / value of HPRT
bHTLV-1 tax mRNA load = value of tax / value of HPRT
cProviral load: HTLV-1 tax copy number per cell
d HBZ mRNA/DNA ratio = HTLV-1 HBZ mRNA load / Proviral load
e tax mRNA/DNA ratio = HTLV-1 tax mRNA load / Proviral load