Jitka Riedlová1, Jana Vignerová2, Markéta Paulová3, Vladimír Musil4, Marek Brabec5, Dagmar Schneidrová6. 1. a Department of Anatomy, Third Faculty of Medicine , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic. 2. b National Center for Breastfeeding , Thomayer Hospital , Prague , Czech Republic. 3. c Department of Children and Adolescents , National Institute of Public Health , Prague , Czech Republic. 4. d Centre of Scientific Information, Third Faculty of Medicine , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic. 5. e Institute of Computer Science , Czech Academy of Sciences , Prague , Czech Republic. 6. f Department of Hygiene, Third Faculty of Medicine , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study concerns the comparison of percentile curves of Czech breastfed children with Czech national references from 1991 and 2001 and WHO growth standards. Growth charts of breastfed children demonstrate different curve shapes, especially in the first months of life. Incorrect interpretation of the growth curve could lead to premature introduction of complementary foods or infant formula. AIM: The comparison of four body parameters of Czech breastfed children with currently used Czech national references and WHO standards in order to recommend that Czech paediatricians use either Czech references or WHO standards in their practice. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and sixty breastfed children were included in the study of length-for-age, head circumference-for-age, weight-for-age and weight-for-length parameters. All percentile curves were compared. Values of the 50th percentile expressed in z-scores based on both Czech references and WHO standards were tested. RESULTS: The study confirmed results of previous surveys documenting that growth of breastfed children is specific. Nevertheless, percentile curves of growth parameters of Czech breastfed children are closer to Czech references than WHO standards. CONCLUSIONS: The Czech national references fulfil the needs of Czech paediatricians (with pointing to specifics of breastfed child growth) and WHO standards are suitable, especially for international comparison.
BACKGROUND: The study concerns the comparison of percentile curves of Czech breastfed children with Czech national references from 1991 and 2001 and WHO growth standards. Growth charts of breastfed children demonstrate different curve shapes, especially in the first months of life. Incorrect interpretation of the growth curve could lead to premature introduction of complementary foods or infant formula. AIM: The comparison of four body parameters of Czech breastfed children with currently used Czech national references and WHO standards in order to recommend that Czech paediatricians use either Czech references or WHO standards in their practice. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and sixty breastfed children were included in the study of length-for-age, head circumference-for-age, weight-for-age and weight-for-length parameters. All percentile curves were compared. Values of the 50th percentile expressed in z-scores based on both Czech references and WHO standards were tested. RESULTS: The study confirmed results of previous surveys documenting that growth of breastfed children is specific. Nevertheless, percentile curves of growth parameters of Czech breastfed children are closer to Czech references than WHO standards. CONCLUSIONS: The Czech national references fulfil the needs of Czech paediatricians (with pointing to specifics of breastfed child growth) and WHO standards are suitable, especially for international comparison.
Entities:
Keywords:
Czech reference; Growth charts; WHO growth standards; breastfed children
Authors: Jitka Riedlová; Markéta Paulová; Jana Vignerová; Marek Brabec; Petr Sedlak; Dagmar Schneidrová Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 3.390