Literature DB >> 28715674

The presence of licit and illicit drugs in police stations and their implications for workplace drug testing.

Gregory S Doran1, Ralph Deans2, Carlo De Filippis2, Chris Kostakis3, Julia A Howitt4.   

Abstract

The presence of licit and illicit drug residues on surfaces was studied in 10 police stations and a central drug evidence store in New South Wales, Australia, with the results compared to similar surfaces in four public buildings (to establish a community baseline). The results of almost 850 workplace surface swabs were also compared to the outcome of drug analysis in urine and hair samples volunteered by police officers. Surfaces were swabbed with alcohol and the swabs were extracted and analysed by LC-MS/MS. Low level concentrations of the more commonly used drugs were detected at four public sites and one restricted access police office facility. Surface swabs taken in 10 city and country police stations yielded positive results for a broader suite of drugs than at background sites however 75-93% of the positive drug results detected in police stations were below 40ng, which is only slightly greater than the largest background result measured in the current study. This study indicates that contamination issues are more likely to be focussed in higher risk areas in police stations, such as counters and balances in charge areas, and surfaces within drug safes although front reception counters also returned surface contamination. All 64 urine samples collected in this study were negative, while only 2 of the 11 hair samples collected from donors resulted in trace concentrations for cocaine, but not its metabolite benzoylecgonine. Positive hair samples were only obtained from police donors in very high risk jobs, indicating that the exposure risk is low. Minor changes to the materials used as work surfaces, and some procedural changes in police stations and large evidence stores are suggested to decrease the likelihood of drugs contaminating work surfaces, thereby reducing the potential exposure of police officers to drugs in the workplace. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contamination; Drugs; Exposure; Police; Surface; Swab; Workplace

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28715674     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  10 in total

Review 1.  Interpol review of toxicology 2016-2019.

Authors:  Wing-Sum Chan; George Fai Wong; Chi-Wai Hung; Yau-Nga Wong; Kit-Mai Fung; Wai-Kit Lee; Kwok-Leung Dao; Chung-Wing Leung; Kam-Moon Lo; Wing-Man Lee; Bobbie Kwok-Keung Cheung
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  The effectiveness of decontamination procedures used in forensic hair analysis.

Authors:  Dylan Mantinieks; Dimitri Gerostamoulos; Paul Wright; Olaf Drummer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 3.  Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.

Authors:  Nicole S Jones; Jeffrey H Comparin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2020-05-24

Review 4.  Occupational health and safety in cannabis production: an Australian perspective.

Authors:  Maggie Davidson; Sue Reed; Jacques Oosthuizen; Greg O'Donnell; Pragna Gaur; Martyn Cross; Gary Dennis
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-10-03

5.  Net Weights: Visualizing and Quantifying their Contribution to Drug Background Levels in Forensic Laboratories.

Authors:  Edward Sisco; Matthew E Staymates; Laura M Watt
Journal:  Forensic Chem       Date:  2020-08

6.  A multi-laboratory investigation of drug background levels.

Authors:  Edward Sisco; Marcela Najarro
Journal:  Forensic Chem       Date:  2019

7.  What's in the bag? Analysis of exterior drug packaging by TD-DART-MS to predict the contents.

Authors:  Edward Sisco; Elizabeth L Robinson; Amber Burns; Rebecca Mead
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  An Easy to Implement Approach for Laboratories to Visualize Particle Spread During the Handling and Analysis of Drug Evidence.

Authors:  Edward Sisco; Matthew E Staymates; Amber Burns
Journal:  Forensic Chem       Date:  2020

9.  A snapshot of drug background levels on surfaces in a forensic laboratory.

Authors:  Edward Sisco; Marcela Najarro; Amber Burns
Journal:  Forensic Chem       Date:  2018

10.  Analysis of Contact Traces of Cannabis by In-Tube Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled to Nanoliquid Chromatography.

Authors:  Neus Jornet-Martínez; Adrián Ortega-Sierra; Jorge Verdú-Andrés; Rosa Herráez-Hernández; Pilar Campíns-Falcó
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.