Literature DB >> 28715259

Teaching Principal Components Using Correlations.

Peter H Westfall1, Andrea L Arias2,3, Lawrence V Fulton4.   

Abstract

Introducing principal components (PCs) to students is difficult. First, the matrix algebra and mathematical maximization lemmas are daunting, especially for students in the social and behavioral sciences. Second, the standard motivation involving variance maximization subject to unit length constraint does not directly connect to the "variance explained" interpretation. Third, the unit length and uncorrelatedness constraints of the standard motivation do not allow re-scaling or oblique rotations, which are common in practice. Instead, we propose to motivate the subject in terms of optimizing (weighted) average proportions of variance explained in the original variables; this approach may be more intuitive, and hence easier to understand because it links directly to the familiar "R-squared" statistic. It also removes the need for unit length and uncorrelatedness constraints, provides a direct interpretation of "variance explained," and provides a direct answer to the question of whether to use covariance-based or correlation-based PCs. Furthermore, the presentation can be made without matrix algebra or optimization proofs. Modern tools from data science, including heat maps and text mining, provide further help in the interpretation and application of PCs; examples are given. Together, these techniques may be used to revise currently used methods for teaching and learning PCs in the behavioral sciences.

Keywords:  Factor analysis; heat map; optimality; rotation; variance explained

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28715259     DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1340824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  4 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of an abbreviated Childhood Family Mealtime Questionnaire among overweight and obese Hispanic adolescents.

Authors:  Cynthia N Lebron; Tae K Lee; Guillermo Prado; Sara M St George; Hilda Pantin; Sarah E Messiah
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Forward Stepwise Deep Autoencoder-based Monotone Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction Methods.

Authors:  Youyi Fong; Jun Xu
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.302

3.  Sex and age differences in cognitive bias and neural activation in response to cognitive bias testing.

Authors:  Travis E Hodges; Grace Y Lee; Sophia H Noh; Liisa A M Galea
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Sex differences in inflammation in the hippocampus and amygdala across the lifespan in rats: associations with cognitive bias.

Authors:  Travis E Hodges; Stephanie E Lieblich; Rebecca K Rechlin; Liisa A M Galea
Journal:  Immun Ageing       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 9.701

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.