Literature DB >> 28715257

Association between Testicular Microlithiasis and Testicular Neoplasia: Large Multicenter Study in a Pediatric Population.

Andrew T Trout1, Jeanne Chow1, Erin R McNamara1, Kassa Darge1, Raul Ramirez Grueso1, Marthe Munden1, Sarah M Rothan1, Oscar M Navarro1, Marta Tijerín Bueno1, Kevin E Bove1, Kudakwashe R Chikwava1, Amer Heider1, M John Hicks1, Gino R Somers1, Bin Zhang1, Jonathan R Dillman1.   

Abstract

Purpose To retrospectively define the strength of association between testicular microlithiasis and testicular neoplasia in a large geographically diverse pediatric population. Materials and Methods Retrospective review of scrotal ultrasonographic (US) examination reports and pathology specimens obtained between January 2000 and May 2014 at six academic pediatric hospitals in North America was performed. Reported cases were reviewed to confirm microlithiasis. Radiology and pathology data bases were searched for pathology-proven testicular tumors (benign or malignant germ cell or stromal tumors). Association strength (risk) was expressed in terms of odds ratios (ORs) with and without adjustment for fixed study site effects based on logistic regression. Results A total of 37 863 individuals underwent scrotal US during the study period. Mean age was 11.1 years ± 4.7 [standard deviation] in boys with microlithiasis and 9.1 years ± 5.9 in boys without microlithiasis (P < .001). Microlithiasis was confirmed in 2.90% of patients (1097 of 37 863; range, 1.61%-5.25% across sites). It was unilateral in 21.97% (241 of 1097) of patients and bilateral in 78.0% (856 of 1097). Tumor was identified in 4.64% (51 of 1097) of boys with microlithiasis and 0.33% (122 of 36 766) of boys without (unadjusted OR, 14.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.29, 20.84; adjusted OR, 14.19). Malignant germ cell tumors were identified in 2.8% (31 of 1097) of boys with microlithiasis and 0.12% (45 of 36 766) of boys without microlithiasis (unadjusted OR, 17.26; 95% CI: 11.8, 25.25; adjusted OR, 22.37). Sex cord-stromal tumors were identified in 0.46% (five of 1097) of boys with microlithiasis and 0.079% (29 of 36 766) of boys without (unadjusted OR, 5.8; 95% CI: 2.1, 16; adjusted OR, 6.39). Conclusion There is a strong association between testicular microlithiasis and primary testicular neoplasia in this pediatric population. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28715257     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  Incidental findings during ultrasound of thyroid, breast, testis, uterus and ovary in healthy term neonates.

Authors:  Juan S Calle-Toro; Andrea Kelly; Eileen J Ford; Babette S Zemel; Joan I Schall; Margaret A Adgent; David M Umbach; Walter J Rogan; Virginia A Stallings; Kassa Darge; Summer L Kaplan
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-02-27

2.  Prepubertal testicular tumors in China: a 10-year experience with 67 cases.

Authors:  Dazhou Wu; Nannan Shen; Xiaokun Lin; Xiaoming Chen
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Imaging of Pediatric Testicular and Para-Testicular Tumors: A Pictural Review.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Hermann; Aurore L'Herminé-Coulomb; Sabine Irtan; Georges Audry; Liesbeth Cardoen; Hervé J Brisse; Saskia Vande Perre; Hubert Ducou Le Pointe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Bilateral methachronous testicular germ cell tumor and testicular microlithiasis in a child: Genetic analysis and insights. A case report.

Authors:  N Boudaoud; G Loron; M Pons; E Landais; S Kozal; M Doco-Fenzy; M L Poli-Merol
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.