Literature DB >> 28715227

Balancing Passive and Active Targeting to Different Tumor Compartments Using Riboflavin-Functionalized Polymeric Nanocarriers.

Yoanna Tsvetkova1, Nataliia Beztsinna2,3, Maike Baues1, Dionne Klein1,4, Anne Rix1, Susanne K Golombek1, Wa'el Al Rawashdeh1,5, Felix Gremse1, Matthias Barz6, Kaloian Koynov7, Srinivas Banala1,8, Wiltrud Lederle1, Twan Lammers1,9, Fabian Kiessling1.   

Abstract

Riboflavin transporters (RFTs) and the riboflavin carrier protein (RCP) are highly upregulated in many tumor cells, tumor stem cells, and tumor neovasculature, which makes them attractive targets for nanomedicines. Addressing cells in different tumor compartments requires drug carriers, which are not only able to accumulate via the EPR effect but also to extravasate, target specific cell populations, and get internalized by cells. Reasoning that antibodies are among the most efficient targeting systems developed by nature, we consider their size (∼10-15 nm) to be ideal for balancing passive and active tumor targeting. Therefore, small, short-circulating (10 kDa, ∼7 nm, t1/2 ∼ 1 h) and larger, longer-circulating (40 kDa, ∼13 nm, t1/2 ∼ 13 h) riboflavin-targeted branched PEG polymers were synthesized, and their biodistribution and target site accumulation were evaluated in mice bearing angiogenic squamous cell carcinoma (A431) and desmoplastic prostate cancer (PC3) xenografts. The tumor accumulation of the 10 kDa PEG was characterized by rapid intercompartmental exchange and significantly improved upon active targeting with riboflavin (RF). The 40 kDa PEG accumulated in tumors four times more efficiently than the small polymer, but its accumulation did not profit from active RF-targeting. However, RF-targeting enhanced the cellular internalization in both tumor models and for both polymer sizes. Interestingly, the nanocarriers' cell-uptake in tumors was not directly correlated with the extent of accumulation. For example, in both tumor models the small RF-PEG accumulated much less strongly than the large passively targeted PEG but showed significantly higher intracellular amounts 24 h after iv administration. Additionally, the size of the polymer determined its preferential uptake by different tumor cell compartments: the 10 kDa RF-PEGs most efficiently targeted cancer cells, whereas the highest uptake of the 40 kDa RF-PEGs was observed in tumor-associated macrophages. These findings imply that drug carriers with sizes in the range of therapeutic antibodies show balanced properties with respect to passive accumulation, tissue penetration, and active targeting. Besides highlighting the potential of RF-mediated (cancer) cell targeting, we show that strong tumor accumulation does not automatically mean high cellular uptake and that the nanocarriers' size plays a critical role in cell- and compartment-specific drug targeting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Riboflavin; branched PEG; passive and active tumor targeting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28715227     DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


  16 in total

1.  Complement Inhibitors Block Complement C3 Opsonization and Improve Targeting Selectivity of Nanoparticles in Blood.

Authors:  Hanmant Gaikwad; Yue Li; Geoffrey Gifford; Ernest Groman; Nirmal K Banda; Laura Saba; Robert Scheinman; Guankui Wang; Dmitri Simberg
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 2.  Tumor targeting via EPR: Strategies to enhance patient responses.

Authors:  Susanne K Golombek; Jan-Niklas May; Benjamin Theek; Lia Appold; Natascha Drude; Fabian Kiessling; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Smart cancer nanomedicine.

Authors:  Roy van der Meel; Einar Sulheim; Yang Shi; Fabian Kiessling; Willem J M Mulder; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Acidity/Reducibility Dual-Responsive Hollow Mesoporous Organosilica Nanoplatforms for Tumor-Specific Self-Assembly and Synergistic Therapy.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Wenpei Fan; Zhantong Wang; Weizhong Zhang; Shiyi Zhou; Yijing Liu; Zhen Yang; Emily Shao; Guofeng Zhang; Orit Jacobson; Lingling Shan; Rui Tian; Siyuan Cheng; Lisen Lin; Yulun Dai; Zheyu Shen; Gang Niu; Jin Xie; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 5.  Leveraging Electrostatic Interactions for Drug Delivery to the Joint.

Authors:  Shreedevi Kumar; Blanka Sharma
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2020-06-17

6.  Tailoring the lipid composition of nanoparticles modulates their cellular uptake and affects the viability of triple negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Hanan Abumanhal-Masarweh; Dana da Silva; Maria Poley; Assaf Zinger; Evgenya Goldman; Nitzan Krinsky; Ron Kleiner; Gal Shenbach; Josh E Schroeder; Jeny Shklover; Janna Shainsky-Roitman; Avi Schroeder
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Sodium bicarbonate nanoparticles modulate the tumor pH and enhance the cellular uptake of doxorubicin.

Authors:  Hanan Abumanhal-Masarweh; Lilach Koren; Assaf Zinger; Zvi Yaari; Nitzan Krinsky; Galoz Kaneti; Nitsan Dahan; Yael Lupu-Haber; Edith Suss-Toby; Esther Weiss-Messer; Michal Schlesinger-Laufer; Janna Shainsky-Roitman; Avi Schroeder
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 8.  Polymer Therapeutics: Biomarkers and New Approaches for Personalized Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Stuart P Atkinson; Zoraida Andreu; María J Vicent
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-01-23

Review 9.  The Protein Corona as a Confounding Variable of Nanoparticle-Mediated Targeted Vaccine Delivery.

Authors:  Matthias Bros; Lutz Nuhn; Johanna Simon; Lorna Moll; Volker Mailänder; Katharina Landfester; Stephan Grabbe
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Graphene-based nanomaterials for breast cancer treatment: promising therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Guangman Cui; Junrong Wu; Jiaying Lin; Wenjing Liu; Peixian Chen; Meng Yu; Dan Zhou; Guangyu Yao
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 10.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.