Literature DB >> 28715132

Return of neonatal CPAP resistance - the Medijet device family examined using in vitro flow simulations.

Markus Falk1,2, Snorri Donaldsson1,3, Baldvin Jonsson1,3, Thomas Drevhammar1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: Medijet nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) generators are a family of devices developed from the Benveniste valve. Previous studies have shown that the in vitro performance of the Medijet disposable generator was similar to the Neopuff resistor system. We hypothesised that resistance would be the main mechanism of CPAP generation in the Medijet disposable generator.
METHODS: The in vitro performance of the Medijet reusable and disposable systems, the Neopuff resistor system and the Benveniste and Infant Flow nonresistor systems were investigated using static and dynamic bench tests.
RESULTS: Large differences in performance were found between the different systems. The disposable Medijet demonstrated high resistance, low pressure stability and high imposed work of breathing. The results also showed that encapsulating the Benveniste valve changed it into a resistor system.
CONCLUSION: The main mechanism of CPAP generation for the disposable Medijet generator was resistance. The Medijet device family showed increasing resistance with each design generation. The high resistance of the Medijet disposable generator could be of great value when examining the clinical importance of pressure stability. Our results suggest that this device should be used cautiously in patients where pressure-stable CPAP is believed to be clinically important. ©2017 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous positive airway pressure; Equipment design; Infant; Newborn; Work of breathing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28715132     DOI: 10.1111/apa.13994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  2 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of CPAP systems used in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Megan Heenan; Jose D Rojas; Z Maria Oden; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Infant CPAP for low-income countries: An experimental comparison of standard bubble CPAP and the Pumani system.

Authors:  Markus Falk; Snorri Donaldsson; Thomas Drevhammar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.