| Literature DB >> 28714849 |
Jacques Le Pendu1, Joana Abrantes2, Stéphane Bertagnoli3, Jean-Sébastien Guitton4, Ghislaine Le Gall-Reculé5, Ana Margarida Lopes2, Stéphane Marchandeau4, Fernando Alda6, Tereza Almeida2,4, Alves Paulo Célio2,7,8, Juan Bárcena9, Galina Burmakina10, Esther Blanco9, Carlos Calvete11, Patrizia Cavadini12, Brian Cooke13, Kevin Dalton14, Miguel Delibes Mateos15, Wieslaw Deptula16, John Sebastian Eden17, Fang Wang18, Catarina C Ferreira19,20, Paula Ferreira21, Pilar Foronda22, David Gonçalves2,7, Dolores Gavier-Widén23,24, Robin Hall25, Beata Hukowska-Szematowicz26, Peter Kerr27, John Kovaliski28, Antonio Lavazza12, Jackie Mahar17,27, Alexander Malogolovkin10, Raquel M Marques21, Sara Marques2,29, Aaron Martin-Alonso22, Pedro Monterroso2, Sacramento Moreno30, Greg Mutze28, Aleksija Neimanis23,24, Paulina Niedzwiedzka-Rystwej26, David Peacock28, Francisco Parra14, Mara Rocchi31, Carlos Rouco32, Nathalie Ruvoën-Clouet1, Eliane Silva2,29, Diogo Silvério2, Tanja Strive25, Gertrudes Thompson2,29, Beata Tokarz-Deptula16, Pedro Esteves2,7,33.
Abstract
Lagoviruses belong to the Caliciviridae family. They were first recognized as highly pathogenic viruses of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) that emerged in the 1970-1980s, namely, rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) and European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV), according to the host species from which they had been first detected. However, the diversity of lagoviruses has recently expanded to include new related viruses with varying pathogenicity, geographic distribution and host ranges. Together with the frequent recombination observed amongst circulating viruses, there is a clear need to establish precise guidelines for classifying and naming lagovirus strains. Therefore, here we propose a new nomenclature based on phylogenetic relationships. In this new nomenclature, a single species of lagovirus would be recognized and called Lagovirus europaeus. The species would be divided into two genogroups that correspond to RHDV- and EBHSV-related viruses, respectively. Genogroups could be subdivided into genotypes, which could themselves be subdivided into phylogenetically well-supported variants. Based on available sequences, pairwise distance cutoffs have been defined, but with the accumulation of new sequences these cutoffs may need to be revised. We propose that an international working group could coordinate the nomenclature of lagoviruses and any proposals for revision.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28714849 DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000840
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gen Virol ISSN: 0022-1317 Impact factor: 3.891