Literature DB >> 28714777

Resisting Temptation: Tracking How Self-Control Conflicts Are Successfully Resolved in Real Time.

Paul E Stillman1, Danila Medvedev2, Melissa J Ferguson2.   

Abstract

Across four studies, we used mouse tracking to identify the dynamic, on-line cognitive processes that underlie successful self-control decisions. First, we showed that individuals display real-time conflict when choosing options consistent with their long-term goal over short-term temptations. Second, we found that individuals who are more successful at self-control-whether measured or manipulated-show significantly less real-time conflict in only self-control-relevant choices. Third, we demonstrated that successful individuals who choose a long-term goal over a short-term temptation display movements that are smooth rather than abrupt, which suggests dynamic rather than stage-based resolution of self-control conflicts. These findings have important implications for contemporary theories of self-control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive processes; goals; open data; open materials; self-control; social cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28714777     DOI: 10.1177/0956797617705386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  13 in total

1.  Using dynamic monitoring of choices to predict and understand risk preferences.

Authors:  Paul E Stillman; Ian Krajbich; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Individual differences in the influence of taste and health impact successful dietary self-control: A mouse tracking food choice study in children.

Authors:  Alaina L Pearce; Shana Adise; Nicole J Roberts; Corey White; Charles F Geier; Kathleen L Keller
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-06-04

3.  Real-life self-control conflicts in anorexia nervosa: An ecological momentary assessment investigation.

Authors:  Sophia Fürtjes; Maria Seidel; Stefan Diestel; Max Wolff; Joseph A King; Inger Hellerhoff; Fabio Bernadoni; Katrin Gramatke; Thomas Goschke; Veit Roessner; Stefan Ehrlich
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 7.156

4.  Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference?

Authors:  Pascal J Kieslich; Martin Schoemann; Tobias Grage; Johanna Hepp; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

Review 5.  Minding One's Reach (To Eat): The Promise of Computer Mouse-Tracking to Study Self-Regulation of Eating.

Authors:  Richard B Lopez; Paul E Stillman; Todd F Heatherton; Jonathan B Freeman
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-05-22

6.  The validity and consistency of continuous joystick response in perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Maciej J Szul; Aline Bompas; Petroc Sumner; Jiaxiang Zhang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-04

7.  The dynamics of self-control: within-participant modeling of binary food choices and underlying decision processes as a function of restrained eating.

Authors:  Claudio Georgii; Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Anna Richard; Zoé Van Dyck; Jens Blechert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-19

8.  Tracking stress via the computer mouse? Promises and challenges of a potential behavioral stress marker.

Authors:  Paul Freihaut; Anja S Göritz; Christoph Rockstroh; Johannes Blum
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-05

9.  The biased hand. Mouse-tracking metrics to examine the conflict processing in a race-implicit association test.

Authors:  Michael Di Palma; Desiré Carioti; Elisa Arcangeli; Cristina Rosazza; Patrizia Ambrogini; Riccardo Cuppini; Andrea Minelli; Manuela Berlingeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Trait self-control does not predict attentional control: Evidence from a novel attention capture paradigm.

Authors:  Michael A Dieciuc; Heather M Maranges; Walter R Boot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.