PURPOSE: To compare the load-velocity relationship between 4 variants of the bench-press (BP) exercise. METHODS: The full load-velocity relationship of 30 men was evaluated by means of an incremental loading test starting at 17 kg and progressing to the individual 1-repetition maximum (1RM) in 4 BP variants: concentric-only BP, concentric-only BP throw (BPT), eccentric-concentric BP, and eccentric-concentric BPT. RESULTS: A strong and fairly linear relationship between mean velocity (MV) and %1RM was observed for the 4 BP variants (r2 > .96 for pooled data and r2 > .98 for individual data). The MV associated with each %1RM was significantly higher in the eccentric-concentric technique than in the concentric-only technique. The only significant difference between the BP and BPT variants was the higher MV with the light to moderate loads (20-70%1RM) in the BPT using the concentric-only technique. MV was significantly and positively correlated between the 4 BP variants (r = .44-.76), which suggests that the subjects with higher velocities for each %1RM in 1 BP variant also tend to have higher velocities for each %1RM in the 3 other BP variants. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the need for obtaining specific equations for each BP variant and the existence of individual load-velocity profiles.
PURPOSE: To compare the load-velocity relationship between 4 variants of the bench-press (BP) exercise. METHODS: The full load-velocity relationship of 30 men was evaluated by means of an incremental loading test starting at 17 kg and progressing to the individual 1-repetition maximum (1RM) in 4 BP variants: concentric-only BP, concentric-only BP throw (BPT), eccentric-concentric BP, and eccentric-concentric BPT. RESULTS: A strong and fairly linear relationship between mean velocity (MV) and %1RM was observed for the 4 BP variants (r2 > .96 for pooled data and r2 > .98 for individual data). The MV associated with each %1RM was significantly higher in the eccentric-concentric technique than in the concentric-only technique. The only significant difference between the BP and BPT variants was the higher MV with the light to moderate loads (20-70%1RM) in the BPT using the concentric-only technique. MV was significantly and positively correlated between the 4 BP variants (r = .44-.76), which suggests that the subjects with higher velocities for each %1RM in 1 BP variant also tend to have higher velocities for each %1RM in the 3 other BP variants. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the need for obtaining specific equations for each BP variant and the existence of individual load-velocity profiles.
Entities:
Keywords:
ballistic; concentric-only; stretch-shortening cycle; traditional
Authors: Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; W Guy Hornsby; Michael H Stone Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 11.928
Authors: Michal Krzysztofik; Michal Wilk; Aleksandra Filip; Piotr Zmijewski; Adam Zajac; James J Tufano Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rafael Martínez-Gómez; Pedro L Valenzuela; Lidia B Alejo; Jaime Gil-Cabrera; Almudena Montalvo-Pérez; Eduardo Talavera; Alejandro Lucia; Susana Moral-González; David Barranco-Gil Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Michal Wilk; Aleksandra Filip; Michal Krzysztofik; Mariola Gepfert; Adam Zajac; Juan Del Coso Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Pablo Jorge Marcos-Pardo; Jorge Miguel González-Hernández; Amador García-Ramos; Abraham López-Vivancos; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes Journal: PeerJ Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 2.984