Literature DB >> 28714357

Pharmaceutical assistance programs for cancer patients in the era of orally administered chemotherapeutics.

Aaron Mitchell1,2,3, Benyam Muluneh4, Rachana Patel4, Ethan Basch1,2.   

Abstract

Introduction The rising cost of cancer drugs may make treatment unaffordable for some patients. Patients often rely on drug manufacturer-administered Pharmaceutical Assistance Programs (PAPs) to obtain drugs and reduced or no cost. The overall usage of PAPs within cancer care delivery is unknown. Methods We included all cancer patients across an academically affiliated, integrated health system in North Carolina during 2014 ( N = 8591). We identified the subset of patients receiving PAP assistance to afford one or more cancer drugs, in order to calculate the proportion of patients receiving PAP assistance, and the retail value of the assistance. Results Among 8591 cancer patients, 215 unique patients submitted a total of 478 successful PAP requests for cancer drugs. 40% of PAP-utilizing patients were uninsured, 23% had Medicaid coverage, 20% had Medicare coverage, 2% were dual Medicare/Medicaid eligible, and 14% were commercially insured. Among all cancer patients who received medical treatment, 6.0% required PAP assistance, whereas 10.6% receiving an oral agent required PAP assistance. The proportion receiving PAP assistance varied substantially by drug, ranging from <1% of patients (e.g. carboplatin, methotrexate) to 50% of patients (e.g. ponatinib, temsirolimus). The majority of the retail value obtained was for oral agents, including $1,556,575 of imatinib and $1,449,633 of dasatinib, which were the two drugs with the highest aggregate retail value. Conclusions A substantial proportion of cancer patients receive private charitable assistance to obtain standard-of-care treatments. This includes patients with federal and private insurance, suggesting an inability of patients to meet cost-sharing requirements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pharmaceutical foundations; charity care; financial assistance; oral drugs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28714357     DOI: 10.1177/1078155217719585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  5 in total

1.  Financial Toxicity in Advanced and Metastatic Cancer: Overburdened and Underprepared.

Authors:  Jason Rotter; Jennifer C Spencer; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Characterizing Out-of-Pocket Payments and Financial Assistance for Patients Prescribed Abiraterone and Enzalutamide at an Academic Cancer Center Specialty Pharmacy.

Authors:  Angelina Y Jeong; Eric B Schwartz; Andrea R Roman; Rachel L McDevitt; Mary K Oerline; Elyssa Henry; Christine M Veenstra; Megan E V Caram
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-09-07

3.  We Should Treat Financial Toxicity With Curative, Rather Than Palliative, Intent.

Authors:  Aaron P Mitchell
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-09-21

4.  Real-World Use of Bone-Modifying Agents in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Aaron P Mitchell; Akriti Mishra Meza; Katherine S Panageas; Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Peter B Bach; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 11.816

5.  Medical Financial Hardship Intensity and Financial Sacrifice Associated with Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Xuesong Han; Jingxuan Zhao; Zhiyuan Zheng; Janet S de Moor; Katherine S Virgo; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.254

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.