| Literature DB >> 28713591 |
Afzal Shamsi1, Fardin Amiri2, Abbas Ebadi3, Musab Ghaderi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thalassemia major has become a public health problem worldwide, particularly in developing and poor countries, while the role of educating the family and community has not been considered enough in patients' care.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28713591 PMCID: PMC5497635 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3685402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Depress Res Treat ISSN: 2090-1321
Figure 1Flowchart of sampling.
The order and content of the training sessions based partnership care model.
| (1) Motivation | The purpose of this stage is to stimulate the patient. At this stage (the first meeting for 2 hours) a description of the study protocol was explained to the intervention group. Then training need was evaluated by assessing and identifying patients through history taking (purposive questions designed by thalassemia and clinical psychology specialists) and paraclinical examination that resulted in a list of problems in the field of treatment and care in three dimensions of unhealthy behavior, unawareness of diet, and inability to control psychological problems of the disease. The results and findings were discussed and exchanged with the active participation of team members including patients, clinical psychologists, nurses, and physician (according to areas of responsibility). |
|
| |
| (2) Readiness | At this stage (the second session for one hour), the intervention group was informed about the nature of visits (training sessions and follow-up) and the objectives and duration of visits and they were provided with the timing of the training program. |
|
| |
| (3) Involvement | This phase includes three visits to educational partnership and two visits to follow-up partnership. |
|
| |
| (4) Evaluation | Phased evaluation was conducted in the beginning and end of each visit. In the final assessment (for 60–90 minutes), the GHQ-28 questionnaire was used to assess the impact of partnership care model on mental health of patients in the intervention group after three months. Then the same method of evaluation was conducted for the control group. |
The comparison of the variables between the experimental and control groups.
| Variable groups | Intervention group | Control group | Statistical test and |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Sex | |||
| Male | 21 (51.2) | 23 (56.1) | Fisher |
| Female | 20 (48.8) | 18 (43.9) | |
| Education | |||
| Primary school | 29 (70.7) | 30 (73.2) |
|
| Secondary school | 9 (22) | 7 (17.1) | |
| High school | 3 (7.3) | 4 (9.8) | |
| Age at diagnosis | |||
| <1 year | 31 (75.6) | 33 (80.5) |
|
| 1–3 years | 3 (7.4) | 2 (4.9) | |
| 3–5 years | 6 (14.6) | 6 (14.6) | |
| >5 years | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| History of other diseases | |||
| Negative | 31 (75.6) | 33 (80.5) |
|
| Diabetes | 3 (7.4) | 2 (4.9) | |
| Kidney disease | 6 (14.6) | 6 (14.6) | |
| Liver disease | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Family status | |||
| Living with two parents | 35 (85.4) | 38 (92.7) |
|
| Living with one parent | 6 (14.6) | 2 (4.9) | |
| Living without parents | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) |
Comparison of mental health and its subscales in the intervention and control groups before and after intervention.
| Variable | Group | Intervention | Control | Independent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| Physical complaints | Before | 6.2 ± 0.42 | 6.0 ± 0.73 |
|
| After | 3.9 ± 0.56 | 5.8 ± 0.67 |
| |
| Paired |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| Anxiety | Before | 8.4 ± 1.07 | 8.6 ± 1.17 |
|
| After | 5.2 ± 1.54 | 9.0 ± 0.66 |
| |
| Paired |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| Social dysfunction | Before | 9.6 ± 0.89 | 9.8 ± 0.37 |
|
| After | 7.0 ± 1.73 | 9.2 ± 0.20 |
| |
| Paired |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| Depression | Before | 10.8 ± 1.30 | 11.0 ± 0.70 |
|
| After | 4.4 ± 1.14 | 11.2 ± 0.44 |
| |
| Paired |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| Total score of mental health | Before | 35.2 ± 7.31 | 35.4 ± 7.83 |
|
| After | 11.4 ± 3.06 | 35.2 ± 7.01 |
| |
| Paired |
|
| ||