Literature DB >> 28713286

Mechanism of Action for rTMS: A Working Hypothesis Based on Animal Studies.

Thangavelu Soundara Rajan1, Maria F M Ghilardi2,3, Hoau-Yan Wang2, Emanuela Mazzon1, Placido Bramanti1, Domenico Restivo4, Angelo Quartarone1,5.   

Abstract

Experiments in rodents have elucidated some of the molecular mechanisms underlying repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). These studies may be useful in a translational perspective so that future TMS studies in rodents can closely match human TMS protocols designed for therapeutic purposes. In the present work we will review the effects of rTMS on glutamate neurotransmission which in turn induce persistent changes in synaptic activity. In particular, we will focus on the role of NMDA and non-NMDA transmission and on the permissive role of BDNF-TrKB interaction in the rTMS induced after-effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BDNF-TrKB signaling; NMDA; TMS; long-term potentiation; neuroprotection

Year:  2017        PMID: 28713286      PMCID: PMC5491851          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


Experiments in rodents are indeed valuable in providing information about the molecular mechanisms of action of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). From the hitherto published work on TMS/rTMS in rodents of almost two decades, it is possible to formulate a working hypothesis on the mechanism of action of rTMS so that future TMS studies in rodents can closely match human TMS protocols. The effects of rTMS in rodents are greatly dependent on: (1) the frequency and field intensity of the stimulation; (2) the acute and chronic mode of treatment; (3) the total number of pulses; (4) the shape and dimension of coils; and (5) the state, either anesthetized or awake, of the animals. Experimental evidences in rodents indicate that rTMS produces complex neurobiochemical effects such as induction of immediate early genes, changes in modulation of neurotransmitters release, effects on glutamate AMPA receptor/NMDA receptor expression (influencing calcium ion dynamics), action on neuroendocrine systems, neuroprotective effects by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, and a powerful activation of neurotrophic factors (Cirillo et al., 2017). These molecular effects may modify the intrinsic and extrinsic electrophysiological properties of neurons and reprogram the expression of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters and their cognate receptors, which lead to long-lasting synaptic plasticity-related changes like Long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) phenomena (Chervyakov et al., 2015; Cirillo et al., 2017). Having said that rTMS provides sustained effects, how does rTMS induce long lasting changes in cortical excitability? An important upstream regulator of synaptic plasticity is the BDNF-TrkB system. Indeed, we showed that 5-day rTMS enhances BDNF binding affinity for TrkB, BDNF-TrkB signaling, and NMDA receptor–TrkB interaction in rat prefrontal cortex (Wang et al., 2011). Interestingly, the same rTMS protocol increases BDNF binding affinity for TrkB and enhances BDNFTrkB signaling in the peripheral lymphocytes of both rats and humans (Wang et al., 2011). These results suggest that the long lasting excitatory effects of rTMS are, at least in part, mediated by glutamatergic NMDA interaction. Indeed, the role of NMDA transmission has been confirmed by several human TMS studies exploring the after effects of anti-glutamatergic drugs on cortical excitability and cortical plasticity (Schwenkreis et al., 2005; Wankerl et al., 2010). However, it is well known that TMS of the motor system produces high frequency repetitive discharge in the corticospinal cells with a frequency of about 700 Hz (Di Lazzaro et al., 1998). Therefore, it is unlikely that TMS may directly interact with NMDA receptors since they may work as a low-pass filter for high frequencies, due to their slow depolarizing currents (Di Lazzaro et al., 1998). Based on these considerations, it is then plausible that at least single pulse TMS may preferentially activate AMPA receptors that open quickly and briefly. This effect of TMS on AMPA receptors has been confirmed by the results of single pulse TMS studies with ketamine in humans (Di Lazzaro et al., 2003). Ketamine, an NMDA antagonist, blocks NMDA receptor activity and enhances non-NMDA transmission through an increased release of endogenous glutamate. Indeed, motor evoked responses were greatly enhanced by ketamine, suggesting that the excitatory effects of single pulse TMS are mediated by short-lasting effects on AMPA transmission (Di Lazzaro et al., 2003). High frequency rTMS-induced expression of the GLUR1 subunit of the AMPA receptors has been demonstrated in rats (Gersner et al., 2011). An important paradox is therefore to reconcile the preferential effect of TMS on AMPA receptors with the long-term excitatory effects that should be mediated by the activity of NMDA receptors. When membrane potential is at rest, NMDA receptors are blocked by Mg++ ions. Once sufficient numbers of AMPA receptors are activated, the membrane is depolarized from resting to active potential, the magnesium blockade is relieved, and the NMDA receptors are opened (Fleming and England, 2010). Therefore, it is possible that when TMS is applied in a repetitive fashion AMPA receptors are recruited in a sufficient number to trigger NMDA transmission. The opening of NMDA receptors increases calcium influx and activates several calcium-sensitive signaling pathways (including phosphorylation of existing AMPA receptors and synthesizing new AMPA receptors) that produce long-term changes in both the presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons that ultimately leads to increased synaptic strength (Malenka and Bear, 2004). Long-term potentiation phenomena are empowered, at least in part, by retrograde signals that further release glutamate and BDNF. Therefore, we postulate that the TMS modulation of BDNF-TrkB pathway could play a permissive role in determining the NMDA dependent after-effects on synaptic plasticity (Wang et al., 2011). This complicate molecular machinery may explain the slow building up of rTMS-induced after-effects (usually 5–10 min) in humans (Quartarone et al., 2006; Ziemann et al., 2008). Despite the role of post-synaptic NMDA transmission on the long lasting effects of rTMS seems very clear, on the other hand there are evidences suggesting the involvement of presynaptic glutamatergic mechanisms (Banerjee et al., 2017). Indeed, it has been demonstrated in an in vitro model that rTMS may increase the steady state current in the presynaptic compartment independently from NMDA postsynaptic transmission. In this way, it is likely that longer duration rTMS protocol may enhance these presynaptic steady state currents thus prolonging the TMS induced after-effects (Banerjee et al., 2017). An important consideration, which might be useful for future clinical application, is whether rTMS targets late LTP and promotes structural plasticity. In a recent paper in mouse entorhino-hippocampal slice cultures, it has been demonstrated that high-frequency (10 Hz) induces a long-lasting increase in glutamatergic synaptic strength that is accompanied by structural remodeling of dendritic spines (Vlachos et al., 2012). This possibility opens a new scenario on the therapeutic effects of rTMS even if need to be better addressed in future studies.

Author contributions

TS: study conception, drafting of the ms; MG, HW, and PB: critical revision; EM: critical revision, analysis of animal literature; DR: critical revision, clinical implications; AQ: study conception, drafting of the ms, crafting of the ms.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer DP and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation, and the handling Editor states that the process nevertheless met the standards of a fair and objective review.
  14 in total

Review 1.  LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches.

Authors:  Robert C Malenka; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Repetitive magnetic stimulation induces functional and structural plasticity of excitatory postsynapses in mouse organotypic hippocampal slice cultures.

Authors:  Andreas Vlachos; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Johannes Rosskopp; Maximilian Lenz; Ulf Ziemann; Thomas Deller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances BDNF-TrkB signaling in both brain and lymphocyte.

Authors:  Hoau-Yan Wang; Domenica Crupi; Jingjing Liu; Andres Stucky; Giuseppe Cruciata; Alessandro Di Rocco; Eitan Friedman; Angelo Quartarone; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Long-term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on markers for neuroplasticity: differential outcomes in anesthetized and awake animals.

Authors:  Roman Gersner; Elena Kravetz; Jodie Feil; Gaby Pell; Abraham Zangen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; D Restuccia; A Oliviero; P Profice; L Ferrara; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Task-specific hand dystonia: can too much plasticity be bad for you?

Authors:  Angelo Quartarone; Hartwig R Siebner; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Ketamine increases human motor cortex excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; P Profice; M A Pennisi; F Pilato; G Zito; M Dileone; R Nicoletti; P Pasqualetti; P A Tonali
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity--a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Peter Schwenkreis; Katja Witscher; Burkhard Pleger; Jean-Pierre Malin; Martin Tegenthoff
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 9.  Possible Mechanisms Underlying the Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander V Chervyakov; Andrey Yu Chernyavsky; Dmitry O Sinitsyn; Michael A Piradov
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Immediate Effects of Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation on Single Cortical Pyramidal Neurons.

Authors:  Jineta Banerjee; Mary E Sorrell; Pablo A Celnik; Galit Pelled
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cognitive Enhancing Effect of High-Frequency Neuronavigated rTMS in Chronic Schizophrenia Patients With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind Controlled 32-Week Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Mei Hong Xiu; Heng Yong Guan; Jian Min Zhao; Ke Qiang Wang; Yan Fen Pan; Xiu Ru Su; Yu Hong Wang; Jin Ming Guo; Long Jiang; Hong Yu Liu; Shi Guang Sun; Hao Ran Wu; Han Song Geng; Xiao Wen Liu; Hui Jing Yu; Bao Chun Wei; Xi Po Li; Tammy Trinh; Shu Ping Tan; Xiang Yang Zhang
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Motor and Perceptual Recovery in Adult Patients with Mild Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Mariagiovanna Cantone; Maria A Catalano; Giuseppe Lanza; Gaetano La Delfa; Raffaele Ferri; Manuela Pennisi; Rita Bella; Giovanni Pennisi; Alessia Bramanti
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Symptoms in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

Authors:  J Antczak; J Pera; M Dąbroś; W Koźmiński; M Czyżycki; K Wężyk; M Dwojak; M Banach; A Slowik
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Enhances Recovery in Central Cord Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Hana Choi; Kyung Cheon Seo; Tae Uk Kim; Seong Jae Lee; Jung Keun Hyun
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2019-02-28

5.  Therapeutic efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jin Seung Choung; Jong Moon Kim; Myoung-Hwan Ko; Dong Sik Cho; MinYoung Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Predicting Individual Treatment Response to rTMS for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Review and the CanStim Perspective.

Authors:  Franziska E Hildesheim; Alexander N Silver; Adan-Ulises Dominguez-Vargas; Justin W Andrushko; Jodi D Edwards; Numa Dancause; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-02-10

7.  Effects of 20 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Disorders of Consciousness: A Resting-State Electroencephalography Study.

Authors:  Fangping He; Min Wu; Fanxia Meng; Yangfan Hu; Jian Gao; Zhongqin Chen; Wangxiao Bao; Kehong Liu; Benyan Luo; Gang Pan
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 8.  Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treating on Post-stroke Depression.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Duan; Gang Yao; Zhongliang Liu; Ranji Cui; Wei Yang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  High-frequency neuronavigated rTMS effect on clinical symptoms and cognitive dysfunction: a pilot double-blind, randomized controlled study in Veterans with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Heng Yong Guan; Jian Min Zhao; Ke Qiang Wang; Xiu Ru Su; Yan Fen Pan; Jin Ming Guo; Long Jiang; Yu Hong Wang; Hong Yu Liu; Shi Guang Sun; Hao Ran Wu; Yan Ping Ren; Han Song Geng; Xiao Wen Liu; Hui Jing Yu; Bao Chun Wei; Xi Po Li; Hanjing Emily Wu; Shu Ping Tan; Mei Hong Xiu; Xiang Yang Zhang
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 6.222

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.