| Literature DB >> 28713261 |
Yuanyuan Chen1,2, Weiwei Wang2,3, Xin Zhao2,3, Miao Sha2,3, Ya'nan Liu2,3, Xiong Zhang2,3, Jianguo Ma1, Hongyan Ni4, Dong Ming2,3.
Abstract
Normal aging is typically characterized by abnormal resting-state functional connectivity (FC), including decreasing connectivity within networks and increasing connectivity between networks, under the assumption that the FC over the scan time was stationary. In fact, the resting-state FC has been shown in recent years to vary over time even within minutes, thus showing the great potential of intrinsic interactions and organization of the brain. In this article, we assumed that the dynamic FC consisted of an intrinsic dynamic balance in the resting brain and was altered with increasing age. Two groups of individuals (N = 36, ages 20-25 for the young group; N = 32, ages 60-85 for the senior group) were recruited from the public data of the Nathan Kline Institute. Phase randomization was first used to examine the reliability of the dynamic FC. Next, the variation in the dynamic FC and the energy ratio of the dynamic FC fluctuations within a higher frequency band were calculated and further checked for differences between groups by non-parametric permutation tests. The results robustly showed modularization of the dynamic FC variation, which declined with aging; moreover, the FC variation of the inter-network connections, which mainly consisted of the frontal-parietal network-associated and occipital-associated connections, decreased. In addition, a higher energy ratio in the higher FC fluctuation frequency band was observed in the senior group, which indicated the frequency interactions in the FC fluctuations. These results highly supported the basis of abnormality and compensation in the aging brain and might provide new insights into both aging and relevant compensatory mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: aging; dynamic functional connectivity; functional connectivity fluctuation frequency; functional connectivity variation; resting-stated fMRI
Year: 2017 PMID: 28713261 PMCID: PMC5491557 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Figure 1Illustration of the dynamic functional connectivity (FC) variation patterns within groups. Pictures (A,D) show the one-sample t-test results of senior and young null groups with phase randomization processed data (FDR p-value < 0.05; actual p-value < 0.0010); Pictures (B,E) show the one-sample t-test results of senior and young groups with the original data (FDR p-value < 0.05; actual p-value < 0.0011); Pictures (C,F) show two-sample t-test results between the original and phase randomized data within the senior and young groups (FDR p-value < 0.05; actual p-value < 0.0008). Red indicates a higher-than-average level in the one-sample t-test and a higher-than-null group in the two-sample t-test.
Figure 2Illustration of the two-sample t-test results of the static FC compared between the senior and young groups. Pictures (A,C) depict the connections level and the network averaging level, respectively; Picture (B) is a 3D view of the results shown in picture (A) (constructed using the BrainNet Viewer). Red indicates an increase in the senior group; blue indicates a decrease in the senior group. The significant level is a p-value < 0.001.
Figure 3Illustration of the two-sample t-test results of the dynamic FC variation (FCV) between the senior and young groups. Pictures (A,C) depict the connections level and network averaging level, respectively; Picture (B) is a 3D view of the results shown in picture (A) (constructed using the BrainNet Viewer). Red indicates an increase in the senior group; blue indicates a decrease in the senior group. The significance level is a p-value < 0.001.
Figure 4Illustration of the two-sample t-test results of the energy percentage in the low fluctuation frequency band compared between the senior and young groups. Pictures (A,C) depict the connections level and the network averaging level, respectively; Picture (B) is a 3D view of the results shown in picture (A) (constructed using the BrainNet Viewer). Red indicates an increase in the senior group; blue indicates a decrease in the senior group. The significance level is a p-value < 0.001.
Figure 5Illustration of the difference (absolute value of the difference) between the mean dynamic FC and the static FC. The results of five networks are individually averaged for all connections, which are plotted as gray curves; the red curves represent the means of all subjects from both groups.
Figure 6Illustration of the frequency spectrum, which varied with the sliding window length, for all five networks of one typical subject. The results of five networks were calculated from the individually averaged FC sequence of the within-network connections.