Literature DB >> 28713063

Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Julian A Abrams1, Sri Komanduri2, Nicholas J Shaheen3, Zengri Wang4, Richard I Rothstein5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery is an established modality for the treatment of morbid obesity. However, approximately one-quarter of patients experience weight regain after initially successful weight loss. Endoscopic therapy targeting the gastric remnant pouch represents a novel potential strategy to re-induce weight loss in this population. We performed a pilot trial of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the gastric remnant pouch after RYGB to determine feasibility, safety, and efficacy for weight loss.
METHODS: We identified patients who had undergone RYGB, achieved >40% excess body weight loss (EBWL), and then regained >25% of lost weight. RFA was applied to the gastrojejunal anastomosis and the entire surface area of the gastric remnant pouch. Treatment was repeated at 4 and 8 months if patients did not meet specified weight loss targets. Weekly weights were obtained for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was percent EBWL at 12 months, compared with baseline.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled at 4 centers. Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age was 45.4 ± 9.1 years, and 84% (21/25) were female. Mean (± SD) baseline body mass index was 40.2 ± 7.8. Twenty-two of 25 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. At 12 months, median (± SD) EBWL was 18.4% (interquartile ratio 10.8, 33.7; P < .0001). Significant weight loss was seen at 3.5 months (P < .0001) and at 7.5 months (P < .0001), with a significant trend for continued weight loss over the 12-month period (P = .013). Two patients had serious adverse events requiring hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: RFA of the gastric remnant pouch in patients with weight regain after RYGB resulted in significant reductions in excess body weight with an acceptable safety profile. Continued weight loss was observed after each RFA treatment. Further clinical trials in well-selected populations are warranted to determine the optimal number and frequency of RFA treatments and to assess durability of weight loss. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01910688.).
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28713063     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  4 in total

Review 1.  Bariatric surgery and the endoscopist.

Authors:  Laura Temperley; Andrew Sullivan; Aruchuna Ruban
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 2.  Endoscopic Evaluation and Management of Late Complications After Bariatric Surgery: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Vivek Kumbhari; Carel W le Roux; Ricardo V Cohen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Development of Bariatric and Metabolic Endoscopy.

Authors:  Shi-Han Li; Yong-Jun Wang; Shu-Tian Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 4.  Therapeutic endoscopy for the treatment of post-bariatric surgery complications.

Authors:  Michael Larsen; Richard Kozarek
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.