Trenton Honda1, Vivian C Pun2, Justin Manjourides2, Helen Suh3. 1. Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 202 Robinson Hall, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, United States. Electronic address: t.honda@northeastern.edu. 2. Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 202 Robinson Hall, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, United States. 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Air pollution exposures have been shown to adversely impact health through a number of biological pathways associated with glucose metabolism. However, few studies have evaluated the associations between air pollution and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Further, no studies have evaluated these associations in US populations or investigated whether associations differ in diabetic as compared to non-diabetic populations. To address this knowledge gap, we investigated the associations between airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and HbA1c levels in both diabetic and non-diabetic older Americans. We also examined the impact of PM2.5 and NO2 on prevalent diabetes mellitus (DM) in this cohort. METHODS: We used multilevel logistic and linear regression models to evaluate the association between long-term average air pollutant levels and prevalence of DM and HbA1c levels, respectively, among 4121 older (57+ years) Americans enrolled in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project between 2005 and 2011. All models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, race, household income, education level, neighborhood socioeconomic status, geographic region, urbanicity and diabetic medication use. We estimated participant-specific exposures to PM2.5 on a six-kilometer grid covering the conterminous U.S. using spatio-temporal models, and to NO2 using nearest measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency's Air Quality System. HbA1c levels were measured for participants in each of two data collection waves from dried blood spots and log-transformed prior to analysis. Participants were considered diabetic if they had HbA1c values≥6.5% or reported taking diabetic medication. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes at study entry was 22.2% (n=916) and the mean HbA1c was 6.0±1.1%. Mean one-year moving average PM2.5 and NO2 exposures were 10.4±3.0μg/m3 and 13.1±7.0 ppb, respectively. An inter-quartile range (IQR, 3.9μg/m3) increase in one-year moving average PM2.5 was positively associated with increased diabetes prevalence (prevalence odds ratio, POR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.53). Similarly, an IQR (8.6 ppb) increase in NO2 was also significantly associated with diabetes prevalence (POR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.48). PM2.5 (1.8%±0.6%, p<0.01) and NO2 (2.0%±0.7%, p<0.01) exposures were associated with higher HbA1c levels in diabetic participants, while only NO2 was significantly associated with HbA1c in non-diabetic participants (0.8%±0.2%, p<0.01). Significant dose response relationships were identified for both pollutants in diabetic participants and for NO2 in non-diabetic participants. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: In a cohort of older men and women in the United States, PM2.5 and NO2 exposures were significantly associated with prevalence of DM and increased HbA1c levels among both non-diabetic and diabetic participants. These associations suggest that air pollution could be a key risk factor for abnormal glucose metabolism and diabetes in the elderly.
BACKGROUND: Air pollution exposures have been shown to adversely impact health through a number of biological pathways associated with glucose metabolism. However, few studies have evaluated the associations between air pollution and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Further, no studies have evaluated these associations in US populations or investigated whether associations differ in diabetic as compared to non-diabetic populations. To address this knowledge gap, we investigated the associations between airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and HbA1c levels in both diabetic and non-diabetic older Americans. We also examined the impact of PM2.5 and NO2 on prevalent diabetes mellitus (DM) in this cohort. METHODS: We used multilevel logistic and linear regression models to evaluate the association between long-term average air pollutant levels and prevalence of DM and HbA1c levels, respectively, among 4121 older (57+ years) Americans enrolled in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project between 2005 and 2011. All models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, race, household income, education level, neighborhood socioeconomic status, geographic region, urbanicity and diabetic medication use. We estimated participant-specific exposures to PM2.5 on a six-kilometer grid covering the conterminous U.S. using spatio-temporal models, and to NO2 using nearest measurements from the Environmental Protection Agency's Air Quality System. HbA1c levels were measured for participants in each of two data collection waves from dried blood spots and log-transformed prior to analysis. Participants were considered diabetic if they had HbA1c values≥6.5% or reported taking diabetic medication. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes at study entry was 22.2% (n=916) and the mean HbA1c was 6.0±1.1%. Mean one-year moving average PM2.5 and NO2 exposures were 10.4±3.0μg/m3 and 13.1±7.0 ppb, respectively. An inter-quartile range (IQR, 3.9μg/m3) increase in one-year moving average PM2.5 was positively associated with increased diabetes prevalence (prevalence odds ratio, POR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.53). Similarly, an IQR (8.6 ppb) increase in NO2 was also significantly associated with diabetes prevalence (POR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.48). PM2.5 (1.8%±0.6%, p<0.01) and NO2 (2.0%±0.7%, p<0.01) exposures were associated with higher HbA1c levels in diabeticparticipants, while only NO2 was significantly associated with HbA1c in non-diabeticparticipants (0.8%±0.2%, p<0.01). Significant dose response relationships were identified for both pollutants in diabeticparticipants and for NO2 in non-diabeticparticipants. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: In a cohort of older men and women in the United States, PM2.5 and NO2 exposures were significantly associated with prevalence of DM and increased HbA1c levels among both non-diabetic and diabeticparticipants. These associations suggest that air pollution could be a key risk factor for abnormal glucose metabolism and diabetes in the elderly.
Authors: Patricia F Coogan; Laura F White; Michael Jerrett; Robert D Brook; Jason G Su; Edmund Seto; Richard Burnett; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M S O'Neill; A Veves; J A Sarnat; A Zanobetti; D R Gold; P A Economides; E S Horton; J Schwartz Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: John F Pearson; Chethan Bachireddy; Sangameswaran Shyamprasad; Allison B Goldfine; John S Brownstein Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ikenna C Eze; Emmanuel Schaffner; Evelyn Fischer; Tamara Schikowski; Martin Adam; Medea Imboden; Ming Tsai; David Carballo; Arnold von Eckardstein; Nino Künzli; Christian Schindler; Nicole Probst-Hensch Journal: Environ Int Date: 2014-06-07 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Qinghua Sun; Peibin Yue; Jeffrey A Deiuliis; Carey N Lumeng; Thomas Kampfrath; Michael B Mikolaj; Ying Cai; Michael C Ostrowski; Bo Lu; Sampath Parthasarathy; Robert D Brook; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Lung Chi Chen; Sanjay Rajagopalan Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-01-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Zorana J Andersen; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Matthias Ketzel; Steen S Jensen; Martin Hvidberg; Steffen Loft; Anne Tjønneland; Kim Overvad; Mette Sørensen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Rebekah J Walker; Emma Garacci; Jennifer A Campbell; Melissa Harris; Elise Mosley-Johnson; Leonard E Egede Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2020-03-13
Authors: Wenyuan Li; Kirsten S Dorans; Elissa H Wilker; Mary B Rice; Itai Kloog; Joel D Schwartz; Petros Koutrakis; Brent A Coull; Diane R Gold; James B Meigs; Caroline S Fox; Murray A Mittleman Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Dean E Schraufnagel; John R Balmes; Clayton T Cowl; Sara De Matteis; Soon-Hee Jung; Kevin Mortimer; Rogelio Perez-Padilla; Mary B Rice; Horacio Riojas-Rodriguez; Akshay Sood; George D Thurston; Teresa To; Anessa Vanker; Donald J Wuebbles Journal: Chest Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Mei Yang; Han Cheng; Chaowei Shen; Jie Liu; Hongkai Zhang; Jiyu Cao; Rui Ding Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: S Rajkumar; M L Clark; B N Young; M L Benka-Coker; A M Bachand; R D Brook; T L Nelson; J Volckens; S J Reynolds; C L'Orange; N Good; K Koehler; S Africano; A B Osorto Pinel; J L Peel Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Tanya L Alderete; Zhanghua Chen; Claudia M Toledo-Corral; Zuelma A Contreras; Jeniffer S Kim; Rima Habre; Leda Chatzi; Theresa Bastain; Carrie V Breton; Frank D Gilliland Journal: Curr Epidemiol Rep Date: 2018-04-10
Authors: Ashley M Hernandez; David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras; Dritana Marko; Kristina W Whitworth Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.162