Literature DB >> 28712716

Differentiation of glioma malignancy grade using diffusion MRI.

Ivan I Maximov1, Aram S Tonoyan2, Igor N Pronin2.   

Abstract

Modern diffusion MR protocols allow one to acquire the multi-shell diffusion data with high diffusion weightings in a clinically feasible time. In the present work we assessed three diffusion approaches based on diffusion and kurtosis tensor imaging (DTI, DKI), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) as possible biomarkers for human brain glioma grade differentiation based on the one diffusion protocol. We used three diffusion weightings (so called b-values) equal to 0, 1000, and 2500s/mm2 with 60 non-coplanar diffusion directions in the case of non-zero b-values. The patient groups of the glioma grades II, III, and IV consist of 8 subjects per group. We found that DKI, and NODDI scalar metrics can be effectively used as glioma grade biomarkers with a significant difference (p<0.05) for grading between low- and high-grade gliomas, in particular, for glioma II versus glioma III grades, and glioma III versus glioma IV grades. The use of mean/axial kurtosis and intra-axonal fraction/orientation dispersion index metrics allowed us to obtain the most feasible and reliable differentiation criteria. For example, in the case of glioma grades II, III, and IV the mean kurtosis is equal to 0.31, 0.51, and 0.90, and the orientation dispersion index is equal to 0.14, 0.30, and 0.59, respectively. The limitations and perspectives of the biophysical diffusion models based on intra-/extra-axonal compartmentalisation for glioma differentiation are discussed.
Copyright © 2017 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DKI; DTI; NODDI; Tumour malignancy differentiation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28712716     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  13 in total

1.  TSPO-PET and diffusion-weighted MRI for imaging a mouse model of infiltrative human glioma.

Authors:  Hayet Pigeon; Elodie A Pérès; Charles Truillet; Benoit Jego; Fawzi Boumezbeur; Fabien Caillé; Bastian Zinnhardt; Andreas H Jacobs; Denis Le Bihan; Alexandra Winkeler
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  The diagnostic role of diffusional kurtosis imaging in glioma grading and differentiation of gliomas from other intra-axial brain tumours: a systematic review with critical appraisal and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gehad Abdalla; Luke Dixon; Eser Sanverdi; Pedro M Machado; Joey S W Kwong; Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths; Antonio Rojas-Garcia; Daisuke Yoneoka; Jelle Veraart; Sofie Van Cauter; Ahmed M Abdel-Khalek; Magdy Settein; Tarek Yousry; Sotirios Bisdas
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Evaluation of methotrexate-conjugated gadolinium(III) for cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Dan Xu; Shu-Ting Lu; Yu-Shuang Li; Aju Baidya; Hao Mei; Yong He; Bo Wu
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  An evidence-based approach to assess the accuracy of diffusion kurtosis imaging in characterization of gliomas.

Authors:  Ruiyu Huang; Yanni Chen; Wenfei Li; Xvfeng Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Current and Future Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapy in Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Benjamin B Kasten; Neha Udayakumar; Jianmei W Leavenworth; Anna M Wu; Suzanne E Lapi; Jonathan E McConathy; Anna G Sorace; Asim K Bag; James M Markert; Jason M Warram
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 11.556

6.  Towards an optimised processing pipeline for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data: Effects of artefact corrections on diffusion metrics and their age associations in UK Biobank.

Authors:  Ivan I Maximov; Dag Alnaes; Lars T Westlye
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Feasibility of generalised diffusion kurtosis imaging approach for brain glioma grading.

Authors:  E L Pogosbekian; I N Pronin; N E Zakharova; A I Batalov; A M Turkin; T A Konakova; I I Maximov
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Evaluation of Temozolomide Treatment for Glioblastoma Using Amide Proton Transfer Imaging and Diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Ryutarou Onishi; Reika Sawaya; Keiho Tsuji; Narumi Arihara; Akiko Ohki; Junpei Ueda; Junichi Hata; Shigeyoshi Saito
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Multi-parametric arterial spin labelling and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of grade II and grade III gliomas.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Lamiaa Galal El-Serougy; Mohamed A Abdelsalam; Gada Mohamed Gaballa; Mona Mohamed Talaat
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-21

10.  The diagnostic value of quantitative analysis of ASL, DSC-MRI and DKI in the grading of cerebral gliomas: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jixin Luan; Mingzhen Wu; Xiaohui Wang; Lishan Qiao; Guifang Guo; Chuanchen Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.