Tony Rosen1, Cynthia Lien2, Michael E Stern1, Elizabeth M Bloemen3, Regina Mysliwiec4, Thomas J McCarthy1, Sunday Clark1, Mary R Mulcare1, Daniel S Ribaudo5, Mark S Lachs2, Karl Pillemer6, Neal E Flomenbaum7. 1. Division of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 2. Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 3. University of Colorado Medical School, Aurora, Colorado. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Astoria, Oregon. 5. Emergency Medical Services, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York. 6. Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 7. Division of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Emergency Medical Services, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers, who perform initial assessments of ill and injured patients, often in a patient's home, are uniquely positioned to identify potential victims of elder abuse, neglect, or self-neglect. Despite this, few organized programs exist to ensure that EMS concerns are communicated to or further investigated by other health care providers, social workers, or the authorities. OBJECTIVE: To explore attitudes and self-reported practices of EMS providers surrounding identification and reporting of elder mistreatment. METHODS: Five semi-structured focus groups with 27 EMS providers. RESULTS: Participants reported believing they frequently encountered and were able to identify potential elder mistreatment victims. Many reported infrequently discussing their concerns with other health care providers or social workers and not reporting them to the authorities due to barriers: 1) lack of EMS protocols or training specific to vulnerable elders; 2) challenges in communication with emergency department providers, including social workers, who are often unavailable or not receptive; 3) time limitations; and 4) lack of follow-up when EMS providers do report concerns. Many participants reported interest in adopting protocols to assist in elder protection. Additional strategies included photographically documenting the home environment, additional training, improved direct communication with social workers, a dedicated location on existing forms or new form to document concerns, a reporting hotline, a system to provide feedback to EMS, and community paramedicine. CONCLUSIONS: EMS providers frequently identify potential victims of elder abuse, neglect, and self-neglect, but significant barriers to reporting exist. Strategies to empower EMS providers and improve reporting were identified.
BACKGROUND: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers, who perform initial assessments of ill and injured patients, often in a patient's home, are uniquely positioned to identify potential victims of elder abuse, neglect, or self-neglect. Despite this, few organized programs exist to ensure that EMS concerns are communicated to or further investigated by other health care providers, social workers, or the authorities. OBJECTIVE: To explore attitudes and self-reported practices of EMS providers surrounding identification and reporting of elder mistreatment. METHODS: Five semi-structured focus groups with 27 EMS providers. RESULTS:Participants reported believing they frequently encountered and were able to identify potential elder mistreatment victims. Many reported infrequently discussing their concerns with other health care providers or social workers and not reporting them to the authorities due to barriers: 1) lack of EMS protocols or training specific to vulnerable elders; 2) challenges in communication with emergency department providers, including social workers, who are often unavailable or not receptive; 3) time limitations; and 4) lack of follow-up when EMS providers do report concerns. Many participants reported interest in adopting protocols to assist in elder protection. Additional strategies included photographically documenting the home environment, additional training, improved direct communication with social workers, a dedicated location on existing forms or new form to document concerns, a reporting hotline, a system to provide feedback to EMS, and community paramedicine. CONCLUSIONS: EMS providers frequently identify potential victims of elder abuse, neglect, and self-neglect, but significant barriers to reporting exist. Strategies to empower EMS providers and improve reporting were identified.
Authors: R C Hunt; T W Whitley; E J Allison; R V Aghababian; J R Krohmer; F Landes; J B McCabe; N H Prasad; E S Cabinum Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Jan L Jensen; Andrew H Travers; Emily G Marshall; Ed Cain; Stephen Leadlay; Alix J E Carter Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Brooke L Namboodri; Tony Rosen; Joseph A Dayaa; Jason J Bischof; Nadeem Ramadan; Mehul D Patel; Joseph Grover; Jane H Brice; Timothy F Platts-Mills Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Yun-Jung Choi; Meaghan O'Donnell; Hwa-Bok Choi; Hae-Sun Jung; Sean Cowlishaw Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Abbie West; Cara Cawley; Elizabeth Crow; Alexis M Stoner; Natalie M Fadel; Kristi Ford-Scales; Ning Cheng Journal: J Med Educ Curric Dev Date: 2021-06-18