| Literature DB >> 28712646 |
Simon Fishel1, Alison Campbell2, Sue Montgomery3, Rachel Smith4, Lynne Nice5, Samantha Duffy3, Lucy Jenner6, Kathyrn Berrisford6, Louise Kellam6, Rob Smith7, Ivy D'Cruz8, Ashley Beccles2.
Abstract
The increasing corpus of clinical studies using time-lapse imaging for embryo selection demonstrates considerable variation in study protocols and only limited-sized study cohorts. Outcome measures are based on implantation or clinical pregnancy; some predict blastulation from early cleavage-stage data, and few have evaluated live birth. Erroneously, most studies treat the embryos as independent variables and do not include patient or treatment variables in the statistical analyses. In this study, cohort size was 14,793 patients and 23,762 cycles. The incidence of live birth (n = 973 deliveries) after embryo selection by objective morphokinetic algorithms was compared with conventional embryology selection parameters (n = 6948 deliveries). A 19% increase in the incidence of live birth was observed when morphokinetic data were used to select embryos for the patient cohort aged younger than 38 years (OR 1.19 with 95% CI 1.06 to 1.34) using their own eggs, and an increase of 37% for oocyte recipients aged over 37 years (OR 1.370; 95% Cl 0.763 to 2.450). This is the largest study of the prospective use of time-lapse imaging algorithms in IVF reporting on live birth outcome, although the nature of purely a closed system versus standard incubation could not be assessed.Entities:
Keywords: Embryo imaging; Human; IVF; Live birth; Time-lapse
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28712646 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biomed Online ISSN: 1472-6483 Impact factor: 3.828