| Literature DB >> 28712047 |
Mohamed F Mostafa1, Yasser Y Abed2, Sallam I Fawzy2.
Abstract
The optimal treatment of aneurysmal bone cyst remains challenging. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of using bone grafts shaped to the defects caused by aneurysmal bone cysts of upper limb bones. Fifteen patients (12 males and 3 females) with an average age of 12 years (range 6-16 years) were treated for aneurysmal bone cysts of upper limb bones by intralesional resection, argon beam coagulation and shaped bone graft. The grafts were harvested from 14 patients (11 fibulas and 3 iliac bones) and from the mother of one patient (proximal fibula). Osteosynthesis was required to stabilize the graft in four cases. The modified Enneking's scoring system was used for functional evaluation. One patient developed partial recurrence at 6 months and required reoperation. Superficial wound infection was encountered in one patient. Shortening of the humeral segment was seen in two patients (1 and 1.5 cm) but without angular deformity. After a mean follow-up of 45 months (range 24-68 months), the mean functional score was 97.3%. This technique proved to be reliable in obtaining a well reconstructed and growing bone with no or minimal deformity and good function.Entities:
Keywords: Aneurysmal; Bone cyst; Shaped graft
Year: 2017 PMID: 28712047 PMCID: PMC5653600 DOI: 10.1007/s11751-017-0291-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ISSN: 1828-8928
Details and results in 15 patients with aneurysmal bone cysts of upper limb bones
| Case no. | Age | Gender | Location | Stage | Size (cm3) | Follow-up (month) | Time to consolidation (week) | Scorea | Complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | Female | distal Radius | Stage 3 | 48 | 68 | 16 | 97 | No complication |
| 2 | 12 | Male | Distal humerus | Stage 3 | 60 | 60 | 20 | 100 | No complication |
| 3 | 15 | Male | Distal humerus | Stage 2 | 30 | 55 | 16 | 100 | No complication |
| 4 | 16 | Female | Distal humerus | Stage 3 | 60 | 52 | 18 | 100 | No complication |
| 5 | 8 | Male | Proximal humerus | Stage 3 | 66 | 50 | 18 | 97 | Partial recurrence |
| 6 | 10 | Male | Proximal humerus | Stage 2 | 60 | 54 | 12 | 97 | Superficial infection |
| 7 | 11 | Male | Proximal humerus | Stage 2 | 40 | 45 | 16 | 100 | No complication |
| 8 | 16 | Male | Proximal humerus | Stage 3 | 150 | 50 | 22 | 90 | Shortening of humerus |
| 9 | 14 | Male | Shaft humerus | Stage 2 | 72 | 41 | 20 | 100 | No complication |
| 10 | 7 | Male | Distal radius | Stage 2 | 30 | 40 | 12 | 97 | No complication |
| 11 | 11 | Male | Shaft humerus | Stage 2 | 99 | 39 | 14 | 100 | No complication |
| 12 | 13 | Male | Proximal humerus | Stage 3 | 105 | 35 | 20 | 97 | No complication |
| 13 | 14 | Male | Proximal humerus | Stage 2 | 60 | 29 | 16 | 97 | No complication |
| 14 | 15 | Female | Proximal humerus | Stage 3 | 240 | 25 | 22 | 87 | Shortening of humerus |
| 15 | 10 | Male | Proximal humerus | Stage 2 | 52 | 24 | 14 | 100 | No complication |
aEnneking scoring system (rating percentage of normal) [16]
Fig. 1An intraoperative photograph showing the argon beam coagulator wand used as a paint brush with eschar formation throughout the entire inner wall
Fig. 2a–c Diagrams showing the selected part of the proximal fibula placed after extended curettage of a proximal humeral lesion, the expanded outer cortex was gently collapsed and composite bone substitute was used to fill the gaps. d The proximal fibular graft provides a smooth cancellous surface. e After placement of the graft with the cancellous surface opposite the broached area of the physis
Fig. 3a Anteroposterior radiograph of a 6-year-old girl with ABC destructing the distal one-third of left radius (Case 1). b Proximal fibular graft was harvested from her mother, shaped and stabilized with plate and screws. c Follow-up radiograph showing continued growth of the graft and maintained open physis. d 5 years after surgery with continuing growth and no deformity
Fig. 4Photograph showing fibular shaft graft placed intramedullary in humeral diaphyseal lesion
Fig. 5a–c Diagrams of an eccentric distal humeral ABC, the planned area of iliac bone graft and placement of the graft with the thick portion (x–y) laterally and the thin apex (z) centrally toward the area where coronoid and olecranon fossae met. d An intraoperative photograph showing the iliac bone graft shaped to the defect in the medial humeral condyle (Case 4). e The graft in place
Reported studies using different adjuvant agents compared with the current study
| Study | Number of patients | Treatment | Adjuvant | Number of recurrence (%) | Mean functional scorea | Complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ozaki et al. [ | 14 | Curettage | PMMA in 5 | 2 (14%) | NSb | 1 fracture |
| Dormans et al. [ | 45 | Curettage | Cauterization | 8 (18%) | NS | – |
| Basarir et al. [ | 56 | Curettage | Cauterization | 9 (16%) | NS | 4 deformities |
| Peeters et al. [ | 80 | Curettage | Liquid nitrogen | 4 (5%) | 97.3% | 1 postoperative fracture |
| Cumming et al. [ | 29 | Curettage | Argon beam coagulation in 17 | 4 (14%) | NS | 1 physeal arrest |
| Current study | 15 | Curettage | Argon beam coagulation | 1 (7%) | 97% | 1 superficial wound infection |
aModified Enneking scoring system [16]
b NS not stated