Literature DB >> 28711635

Assessing Pain Using the Variation Coefficient of Pupillary Diameter.

David J Charier1, Daniel Zantour2, Vincent Pichot3, Florian Chouchou4, Jean-Claude M Barthelemy3, Frederic Roche3, Serge B Molliex5.   

Abstract

Pupillary diameter (PD) varies under the influence of the sympathetic as well as parasympathetic systems, increasing proportionally with pain intensity. Such variations however, should not be confused with pupillary fluctuations, which refer to the fast and permanent PD fluctuations induced by the ongoing interplay between the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, which we propose to measure using the variation coefficient of PD (VCPD). This study aimed first at correlating PD, PD increase during a contraction, and VCPD, with pain rated using a numeric rating scale (NRS) during obstetrical labor, and then at comparing such correlations with each other. Forty patients were included in the study, and 160 simultaneous ratings (NRS, PD, and VCPD) were taken: 40 in the presence of uterine contractions and 40 in the absence of such contractions, before and 20 minutes after epidural analgesia. VCPD correlates more strongly (r = .77) than PD increase (r = .42) with pain rated using a NRS. The ability of VCPD to predict the occurrence of NRS scores ≥4 during obstetrical labor is .97 (confidence interval, .93-1.0). When measured over 10 seconds during contraction, VCPD correlates more strongly than PD increase with pain rated using the NRS. Such stronger correlation allows for an easy assessment of antinociception-nociception balance. PERSPECTIVE: The VCPD allows for an objective assessment of pain in laboring women. It could allow for an easy assessment of pain in noncommunicating patients: newborns or very old patients, patients with serious psychological conditions, assessment during the immediate postoperative period, or in intensive care units.
Copyright © 2017 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain assessment; autonomic nervous system; pupillary diameter; pupillary unrest; variation coefficient of pupillary diameter

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28711635     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  6 in total

1.  Suppression of pupillary unrest by general anesthesia and propofol sedation.

Authors:  Matthias Behrends; Merlin D Larson; Andrew E Neice; Michael P Bokoch
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Pupillometry in perioperative medicine: a narrative review.

Authors:  Senthil Packiasabapathy; Valluvan Rangasamy; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.713

3.  EEMD-Based Steady-State Indexes and Their Applications to Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Railway Axle Bearings.

Authors:  Cai Yi; Dong Wang; Wei Fan; Kwok-Leung Tsui; Jianhui Lin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Pupil size variation as a response to stress in European catfish and its application for social stress detection in albino conspecifics.

Authors:  Ondřej Slavík; Pavel Horký; Josef Velíšek; Tereza Valchářová
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Experimental Exploration of Objective Human Pain Assessment Using Multimodal Sensing Signals.

Authors:  Yingzi Lin; Yan Xiao; Li Wang; Yikang Guo; Wenchao Zhu; Biren Dalip; Sagar Kamarthi; Kristin L Schreiber; Robert R Edwards; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Towards the Objective Identification of the Presence of Pain Based on Electroencephalography Signals' Analysis: A Proof-of-Concept.

Authors:  Colince Meli Segning; Jessica Harvey; Hassan Ezzaidi; Karen Barros Parron Fernandes; Rubens A da Silva; Suzy Ngomo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.847

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.