Benjamin P Ziemer1, Satomi Shiraishi2, Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth1, Parag Sanghvi1, Kevin Lawrence Moore3. 1. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: kevinmoore@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As knowledge-based planning (KBP) attempts to augment and potentially supplant manual treatment planning, it is imperative to ensure any implementation maintains or improves overall plan quality in any disease site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the overall quality of KBP-driven automated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning using blinded physician comparison and determine systematic factors predictive of physician plan preference to guide future KBP refinement. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Automated noncoplanar volume modulated arc therapy KBP routines were developed for 199 plans across 3 clinical SRS scenarios: isolated lesions (isolated), lesions closely abutting (<3 cm) organs at risk (involved), and single-isocenter multiple metastases (multimet). Overall plan quality and preference were assessed via blinded review of the plans by two SRS physicians. Quantitative quality metrics were also compared to determine systematic differences in the treatment plans. Multiple parameters were investigated as predictors of KBP plan selection. RESULTS: For the isolated, involved, and multimet scenarios, the KBP plans were considered to be superior or equivalent to clinical plans 86.7% (91/105), 81.1% (43/53), and 78.1% (32/41) of the time, respectively. All investigated quality metrics were equivalent or indicated more sparing for all KBP plans. The only nondosimetric predictor was planning target volume in the isolated (P = .02) and involved (P = .05) groups. The dosimetric predictors for the isolated group were gradient measure and heterogeneity index (both P < .01). In the multimet category, the only significant dosimetric predictor was interlesion dose (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated KBP SRS plans were equivalent or superior to previously treated plans in 83.4% (166/199) of cases. In clinical implementation, geometric features found to be predictive of KBP performance can be used to identify plans where KBP results might benefit from further refinement, whereas dosimetric predictive features could be used to further refine KBP optimization priorities.
PURPOSE: As knowledge-based planning (KBP) attempts to augment and potentially supplant manual treatment planning, it is imperative to ensure any implementation maintains or improves overall plan quality in any disease site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the overall quality of KBP-driven automated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning using blinded physician comparison and determine systematic factors predictive of physician plan preference to guide future KBP refinement. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Automated noncoplanar volume modulated arc therapy KBP routines were developed for 199 plans across 3 clinical SRS scenarios: isolated lesions (isolated), lesions closely abutting (<3 cm) organs at risk (involved), and single-isocenter multiple metastases (multimet). Overall plan quality and preference were assessed via blinded review of the plans by two SRS physicians. Quantitative quality metrics were also compared to determine systematic differences in the treatment plans. Multiple parameters were investigated as predictors of KBP plan selection. RESULTS: For the isolated, involved, and multimet scenarios, the KBP plans were considered to be superior or equivalent to clinical plans 86.7% (91/105), 81.1% (43/53), and 78.1% (32/41) of the time, respectively. All investigated quality metrics were equivalent or indicated more sparing for all KBP plans. The only nondosimetric predictor was planning target volume in the isolated (P = .02) and involved (P = .05) groups. The dosimetric predictors for the isolated group were gradient measure and heterogeneity index (both P < .01). In the multimet category, the only significant dosimetric predictor was interlesion dose (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated KBP SRS plans were equivalent or superior to previously treated plans in 83.4% (166/199) of cases. In clinical implementation, geometric features found to be predictive of KBP performance can be used to identify plans where KBP results might benefit from further refinement, whereas dosimetric predictive features could be used to further refine KBP optimization priorities.
Authors: Adenike Olanrewaju; Laurence E Court; Lifei Zhang; Komeela Naidoo; Hester Burger; Sameera Dalvie; Julie Wetter; Jeannette Parkes; Christoph J Trauernicht; Rachel E McCarroll; Carlos Cardenas; Christine B Peterson; Kathryn R K Benson; Monique du Toit; Ricus van Reenen; Beth M Beadle Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-02-25