Literature DB >> 28710999

Recent changes in county-level corn yield variability in the United States from observations and crop models.

Guoyong Leng1.   

Abstract

The United States is responsible for 35% and 60% of global corn supply and exports. Enhanced supply stability through a reduction in the year-to-year variability of US corn yield would greatly benefit global food security. Important in this regard is to understand how corn yield variability has evolved geographically in the history and how it relates to climatic and non-climatic factors. Results showed that year-to-year variation of US corn yield has decreased significantly during 1980-2010, mainly in Midwest Corn Belt, Nebraska and western arid regions. Despite the country-scale decreasing variability, corn yield variability exhibited an increasing trend in South Dakota, Texas and Southeast growing regions, indicating the importance of considering spatial scales in estimating yield variability. The observed pattern is partly reproduced by process-based crop models, simulating larger areas experiencing increasing variability and underestimating the magnitude of decreasing variability. And 3 out of 11 models even produced a differing sign of change from observations. Hence, statistical model which produces closer agreement with observations is used to explore the contribution of climatic and non-climatic factors to the changes in yield variability. It is found that climate variability dominate the change trends of corn yield variability in the Midwest Corn Belt, while the ability of climate variability in controlling yield variability is low in southeastern and western arid regions. Irrigation has largely reduced the corn yield variability in regions (e.g. Nebraska) where separate estimates of irrigated and rain-fed corn yield exist, demonstrating the importance of non-climatic factors in governing the changes in corn yield variability. The results highlight the distinct spatial patterns of corn yield variability change as well as its influencing factors at the county scale. I also caution the use of process-based crop models, which have substantially underestimated the change trend of corn yield variability, in projecting its future changes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate change; Crop models; Crop yields; Stability; Statistical models; Variability

Year:  2017        PMID: 28710999     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Crop yield sensitivity of global major agricultural countries to droughts and the projected changes in the future.

Authors:  Guoyong Leng; Jim Hall
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Climate-Driven Crop Yield and Yield Variability and Climate Change Impacts on the U.S. Great Plains Agricultural Production.

Authors:  Meetpal S Kukal; Suat Irmak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Parameterization-induced uncertainties and impacts of crop management harmonization in a global gridded crop model ensemble.

Authors:  Christian Folberth; Joshua Elliott; Christoph Müller; Juraj Balkovič; James Chryssanthacopoulos; Roberto C Izaurralde; Curtis D Jones; Nikolay Khabarov; Wenfeng Liu; Ashwan Reddy; Erwin Schmid; Rastislav Skalský; Hong Yang; Almut Arneth; Philippe Ciais; Delphine Deryng; Peter J Lawrence; Stefan Olin; Thomas A M Pugh; Alex C Ruane; Xuhui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Predicting spatial and temporal variability in crop yields: an inter-comparison of machine learning, regression and process-based models.

Authors:  Guoyong Leng; Jim W Hall
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 6.947

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.