| Literature DB >> 28710458 |
Kazumasa Suzuki1,2, Luca Malfatti1,3, Masahide Takahashi2,3, Davide Carboni1,3, Fabrizio Messina4, Yasuaki Tokudome2,3, Masanori Takemoto2, Plinio Innocenzi5,6.
Abstract
Advanced optical apEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28710458 PMCID: PMC5511139 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05540-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) TEM image of the C-dots. (b) TEM image of the yellow dotted line in Fig. 1a. The lattice fringes correspond to (110) planes of graphite. (c) UV-Vis absorption spectrum of C-dots in water. The inset shows the picture of the C-dots dispersion in water under daylight and upon UV (365 nm) irradiation.
Figure 2Photoluminescence excitation-emission-intensity spectra of C-dots dispersed in different solvents: (a) water, (b) ethanol, (c) hexanol. The intensity is shown in a false color scale. The spectrum region with an emission intensity higher than 25% of C-dots in water is shown as reference (white dotted line). (d) Excitation spectra of C-dots in water corresponding to the emission at 430 nm (black line, top) and at 490 nm (red line, bottom). The latter curve is formed by two overlapped components (blue and green lines) that have been separated by deconvolution.
Figure 3Images of GPTMS – C-dots mixtures at increasing reaction times: (a) 1 hour, (b) 2 days, (c) 5 days and (d) 2 weeks.
Figure 4(a) FTIR absorption spectra in the range 1660–1580 cm−1 of the GPTMS – C-dots grafting sol at different reaction times: 1 hour (black line), 2 days (blue line), 5 days (green line) and 2 weeks (red line). The arrow is a guide for eyes to indicate the increase of the vinyl bands with the reaction time. (b) 1H-NMR spectra of GPTMS – C-dots grafting sol with reaction times up to 3 weeks. (c) Formation of ethylene oxide chains with grafting through epoxy-ring opening and the polymerization between GPTMS molecules at the C-dots surface.
Figure 5(a) Photoluminescence spectra of MTES – C-dots (black line) and MTES – GC-dots (red line) nanocomposite films excited at 365 nm. The emission of C-dots in water (green line) excited at the same wavelength is reported as reference. (b,c) Excitation-emission-intensity spectra of the films, prepared from pristine C-dots and GPTMS-grafted C-dots, dispersed in a MTES sol. Normalized photoluminescence intensity is reported in false color scale from blue to red (0–100%). The inset of Fig. 5a shows the appearance of the films under UV lamp irradiation (λ = 365 nm). The spectrum region with an emission intensity higher than 25% of C-dots in water is shown as reference (white dotted line). The black dotted line represents the estimated new emission area peaked around 490 nm.
Figure 6(a) Photoluminescence spectra of GPTMS – C-dots (black line) and GPTMS – GC-dots (red line) nanocomposite films excited at 365 nm. The emission of C-dots in water (green line) excited at the same wavelength is reported as reference. (b,c) excitation-emission-intensity spectra of the films, prepared from pristine C-dots and GPTMS-grafted C-dots, dispersed in GPTMS sol through sol-gel process. Photoluminescence intensity, normalized by the peak-top count, is reported in false color scale from blue to red (0–100%). The inset of Fig. 6a shows the appearance of these films under UV lamp irradiation (λ = 365 nm). The spectrum region with an emission intensity higher than 25% of C-dots in water is shown as reference (white dotted line). The black dotted line represents the estimated new emission area peaked at around 490 nm.
Figure 7Photoluminescence excitation-emission-intensity spectra of C-dots dispersed in (a) polyethylene glycol 200 (PEG-200) and (b) grafted C-dots dispersed in ethanol. The spectrum region with an emission intensity higher than 25% of C-dots in water is shown as reference (white dotted line).
Figure 8PL energy levels diagram of the GPTMS – GC-dots system.