Literature DB >> 28710085

Risk factors for and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture during endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Shuhei Kawabata1, Hirotoshi Imamura1, Hidemitsu Adachi1, Shoichi Tani1, So Tokunaga1, Takayuki Funatsu1, Keita Suzuki1, Nobuyuki Sakai1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The risk factors for intraprocedural rupture (IPR) of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) and the outcomes of IPR itself are unclear. This study was performed to identify the independent risk factors for and outcomes of IPR.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records and radiologic data of 1375 patients (1406 UIAs) who underwent coil embolization from January 2001 to October 2016.
RESULTS: IPR occurred in 20 aneurysms of 20 patients (1.4%). Univariate analyses showed that the rate of IPR was significantly higher in the treatment of aneurysms with a small dome size, aneurysms in the anterior communicating artery (AcomA) (6.6%), and patients with a medical history of dyslipidemia. Multivariate analyses showed that a small dome size and aneurysms in the AcomA were independently associated with IPR (p=0.0096 and p=0.0001, respectively). IPR induced by a microcatheter was associated with a higher risk of severe subarachnoid hemorrhage than other causes of IPR (57% vs 0%, respectively). Thromboembolic complications occurred in seven (35%) patients with IPR. Six (30%) patients required external ventricular drainage placement after developing symptoms of acute hydrocephalus. The overall morbidity and mortality rates from IPR were 0.22% and 0.15%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysms in the AcomA and with a small dome size are likely to be risk factors for IPR. IPR induced by microcatheters can result in poor outcomes. The rate of IPR-associated thromboembolic complications is high, and IPR itself is associated with acute hydrocephalus. If managed appropriately, however, most patients with IPR can survive without neurological deterioration. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm; Coil; Complication; Hemorrhage; Technique

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28710085     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  5 in total

Review 1.  Complications of endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms: Management and prevention.

Authors:  Yon Kwon Ihn; Shang Hun Shin; Seung Kug Baik; In Sup Choi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Aneurysm Perforation Due to Advancement of the Coil Delivery Wire During Stent-Assisted Embolization.

Authors:  Takuya Osuki; Hiroyuki Ikeda; Minami Uezato; Masanori Kinosada; Masaki Chin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-16

3.  Microwire navigation and microcatheter positioning by balloon manipulation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A pilot study.

Authors:  Ali Burak Binboga; Mehmet Onay; Cetin Murat Altay
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-13

4.  Independent predictors and risk score for intraprocedural rupture during endovascular treatment of small ruptured intracranial aneurysms (<5 mm).

Authors:  Fei Peng; Xin Feng; Xiaoxin He; Hao Niu; Hong Zhang; Xin Tong; Baorui Zhang; Jiaxiang Xia; Xuge Chen; Boya Xu; Peng Qi; Jun Lu; Daming Wang; Aihua Liu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Use of second generation supraglottic airway device for endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Paola Hurtado; Marta Garcia-Orellana; Sergi Amaro; Enrique Carrero; Federico Zarco; Anna Lopez; Neus Fabregas; Ricard Valero
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.