Literature DB >> 28709937

Detection of Lung Cancer and EGFR Mutation by Electronic Nose System.

Dekel Shlomi1, Manal Abud2, Ori Liran3, Jair Bar4, Naomi Gai-Mor3, Maya Ilouze3, Amir Onn4, Alon Ben-Nun5, Hossam Haick2, Nir Peled6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Early detection of lung cancer (LC) has been well established as a significant key point in patient survival and prognosis. New highly sensitive nanoarray sensors for exhaled volatile organic compounds that have been developed and coupled with powerful statistical programs may be used when diseases such as LC are suspected. Detection of genetic aberration mutation by nanoarray sensors is the next target.
METHODS: Breath samples were taken from patients who were evaluated for suspicious pulmonary lesions. Patients were classified as those with benign nodules, as patients with LC with or without the EGFR mutation, and according to their smoking status. Breath prints were recognized by nanomaterial-based sensor array, and pattern recognition methods were used.
RESULTS: A total of 119 patients participated in this study, 30 patients with benign nodules and 89 patients with LC (16 with early disease and 73 with advanced disease). Patients with LC who harbored the EGFR mutation (n = 19) could be discriminated from those with wild-type EGFR (n = 34) with an accuracy of 83%, sensitivity of 79%, and specificity of 85%. Discrimination of early LC from benign nodules had 87% accuracy and positive and negative predictive values of 87.7 and 87.5% respectively. Moderate discrimination (accuracy of 76%) was found between LC of heavy smokers and that of never-smokers or distant past light smokers.
CONCLUSIONS: Breath analysis could discriminate patients with LC who harbor the EGFR mutation from those with wild-type EGFR and those with benign pulmonary nodules from those patients with early LC. A positive breath print for the EGFR mutation may be used in treatment decisions if tissue sampling does not provide adequate material for definitive mutation analysis.
Copyright © 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic nose; Lung cancer; Pulmonary nodule; Sensor; Volatile organic compound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28709937     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.06.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  10 in total

Review 1.  Fabricating and printing chemiresistors based on monolayer-capped metal nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yana Milyutin; Manal Abud-Hawa; Viki Kloper-Weidenfeld; Elias Mansour; Yoav Y Broza; Gidi Shani; Hossam Haick
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Breath Analysis: A Promising Tool for Disease Diagnosis-The Role of Sensors.

Authors:  Maria Kaloumenou; Evangelos Skotadis; Nefeli Lagopati; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Dimitris Tsoukalas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Diagnostic Performance of Electronic Noses in Cancer Diagnoses Using Exhaled Breath: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max H M C Scheepers; Zaid Al-Difaie; Lloyd Brandts; Andrea Peeters; Bart van Grinsven; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  A selective chemiresistive sensor for the cancer-related volatile organic compound hexanal by using molecularly imprinted polymers and multiwalled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Sajjad Janfaza; Maryam Banan Nojavani; Maryam Nikkhah; Taher Alizadeh; Ali Esfandiar; Mohammad Reza Ganjali
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.833

5.  At-home cancer screening: a solution for China and other developing countries with a large population and limited number of healthcare practitioners.

Authors:  Chao-Nan Qian
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-21

Review 6.  Electronic Nose as a Novel Method for Diagnosing Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chiara Baldini; Lucia Billeci; Francesco Sansone; Raffaele Conte; Claudio Domenici; Alessandro Tonacci
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-25

7.  Role of miR-520b in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Linlin Zhang; Shuangquan Yu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Assessment of an Exhaled Breath Test Using High-Pressure Photon Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry to Detect Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Shushi Meng; Qingyun Li; Zuli Zhou; Hang Li; Xianping Liu; Shuli Pan; Mingru Li; Lei Wang; Yanqing Guo; Mantang Qiu; Jun Wang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 9.  The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology.

Authors:  I G van der Sar; N Wijbenga; M E Hellemons; C C Moor; G Nakshbandi; J G J V Aerts; O C Manintveld; M S Wijsenbeek
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-09-17

10.  Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yu Yang; Wan-Chin Chen; Rodger-Chen Tsai
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.