Literature DB >> 28709886

Five-Year Followup Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Study of Patients with Overactive Bladder Treated with Sacral Neuromodulation.

Steven Siegel1, Karen Noblett2, Jeffrey Mangel3, Jason Bennett4, Tomas L Griebling5, Suzette E Sutherland6, Erin T Bird7, Craig Comiter8, Daniel Culkin9, Samuel Zylstra10, Fangyu Kan11, Kellie Chase Berg11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the therapeutic success rate, changes in quality of life and safety of sacral neuromodulation 5 years after InterStim™ implantation. Included in study were subjects with bothersome symptoms of overactive bladder, including urinary urge incontinence and/or urgency-frequency, in whom at least 1 anticholinergic medication failed and 1 medication had not been tried.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Therapeutic success was defined as a urinary urge incontinence or urgency-frequency response of 50% or greater improvement in average leaks or voids per day, or return to normal voiding, defined as fewer than 8 voids per day. Quality of life was evaluated by ICIQ-OABqol (International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire). Safety was evaluated through adverse events.
RESULTS: Of the 340 subjects who completed the test stimulation 272 had an implant, of whom 91% were female. Mean age was 57 years. At baseline 202 subjects with urinary urge incontinence had a mean ± SD of 3.1 ± 2.7 leaks per day and 189 with urgency-frequency had a mean of 12.6 ± 4.5 voids per day. The 5-year therapeutic success rate was 67% (95% CI 60-74) using modified completers analysis and 82% (95% CI 76-88) using completers analysis. Subjects with urinary urge incontinence had a mean reduction from baseline of 2.0 ± 2.2 leaks per day and subjects with urgency-frequency had a mean reduction of 5.4 ± 4.3 voids per day (each completers analysis p <0.0001). Subjects showed improvement in all ICIQ-OABqol measures (p <0.0001). The most common device related adverse events were an undesirable change in stimulation in 60 of the 272 subjects (22%), implant site pain in 40 (15%) and therapeutic product ineffectiveness in 36 (13%).
CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study shows that sacral neuromodulation had sustained efficacy and quality of life improvements, and an acceptable safety profile through 5 years in subjects with overactive bladder.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrodes; implanted; overactive; quality of life; urinary bladder; urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28709886     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  28 in total

1.  Remotely programmed sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of patients with refractory overactive bladder: a prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel sacral neuromodulation device.

Authors:  Yaoguang Zhang; Peng Zhang; Xiaojun Tian; Guoqing Chen; Yan Li; Yong Zhang; Zhihui Xu; Zhongqing Wei; Wei Zhang; Lulin Ma; Benkang Shi; Limin Liao; Jianye Wang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Sacral neuromodulation treating chronic pelvic pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Amr Mahran; Gina Baaklini; Daisy Hassani; Hassan A Abolella; Ahmed S Safwat; Mandy Neudecker; Adonis K Hijaz; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Steven W Siegel; Sherif A El-Nashar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Sacral neuromodulation: troubleshooting needle placement.

Authors:  Whitney K Hendrickson; Cindy L Amundsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Real-Time Bladder Pressure Estimation for Closed-Loop Control in a Detrusor Overactivity Model.

Authors:  Zhonghua Ouyang; Zachariah J Sperry; Nikolas D Barrera; Tim M Bruns
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  Electrical neuromodulation in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: evidence, experience and future prospects.

Authors:  Alejandro Abello; Anurag K Das
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-02-22

6.  [Sacral neuromodulation for refractory overactive bladder].

Authors:  Arndt van Ophoven
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder in women: do age and comorbidities make a difference?

Authors:  Rachel A High; William Winkelman; Joseph Panza; Derrick J Sanderson; Hyde Yuen; Gabriela Halder; Courtney Shaver; Erin T Bird; Rebecca G Rogers; Jill M Danford
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Outcomes of sacral neuromodulation for chronic pelvic pain: a Finnish national multicenter study.

Authors:  A Zegrea; J Kirss; T Pinta; T Rautio; P Varpe; M Kairaluoma; M Aho; C Böckelman; M Lavonius
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  What Is New in Neuromodulation?

Authors:  Courtenay K Moore; Jessica J Rueb; Samir Derisavifard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  [Sacral neuromodulation in under- and overactive detrusor-quo vadis? : Principles and developments].

Authors:  F Girtner; M Burger; R Mayr
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.