Literature DB >> 28709613

A regional registry study of 216 patients investigating if patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty changes over a time period of five to 20years.

Odei Shannak1, Jeya Palan2, Colin Esler2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the temporal changes in patient dissatisfaction following primary knee arthroplasty surgery (TKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and ninety patients that had previously indicated they were either dissatisfied or unsure with their TKA at one-year post-surgery in our region were mailed a simple questionnaire in addition to the Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5D.
RESULTS: A 55% response rate was achieved. The mean follow-up time period was 9.1years. Of the 120 patients who were initially dissatisfied, 46.7% remained so. Of the 96 patients who were initially unsure, 20.8% remained so, 21.9% and 57.3% became dissatisfied and satisfied, respectively. The primary reason for continued dissatisfaction was persistent pain. Of the 19.4% of patients who had revision surgery, 47.6% remained dissatisfied. 54.2% of patients stated that they would be happy to have a primary TKA again and 55.6% indicated that they would recommend one to a friend. Patients who had concurrent hip pain were six times more likely to remain unsure or dissatisfied over time (OR 6.7, p-value 0.0000). Patients who had back pain or contralateral knee pain were two or three times as likely to remain unsure or dissatisfied.
CONCLUSION: In time half of the patients who stated that they were not satisfied with their arthroplasty, at one year, go on to be satisfied with their knee.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee arthroplasty; PROMS; Satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28709613     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  Single-item satisfaction scores mask large variations in pain, function and joint awareness in patients following total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  F L Loth; J M Giesinger; K Giesinger; C R Howie; D F Hamilton
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-09

2.  Does Early-Period Patient Dissatisfaction Turn Into Satisfaction Over Time After Total Knee Replacement?

Authors:  Mahmut Özdemir; Yüksel Uğur Yaradılmış; Fırat Emin Özdemir; Ahmet Safa Tarğal; Özkan Öztürk; Murat Altay
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-07-17

3.  What matters to patients following total knee arthroplasty? A grounded theory of adapting to a knee replacement.

Authors:  Ellen Randall; Stirling Bryan; Charlyn Black; Laurie J Goldsmith
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Influence of femoral implant design modification on anterior knee pain and patellar crepitus in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Huang; Yu-Hang Gao; Lu Ding; Bo Liu; Jian-Guo Liu; Xin Qi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Comparative clinical and cost analysis between surgical and non-surgical intervention for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Luxme Mahendira; Caroline Jones; Angelo Papachristos; James Waddell; Laurence Rubin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.