Rachel E Ashley, R Hunter Lindsey, Sylvia A McPherson1, Charles L Turnbough1, Robert J Kerns2, Neil Osheroff3. 1. Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States. 2. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Iowa College of Pharmacy , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States. 3. VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System , Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States.
Abstract
Gyrase appears to be the primary cellular target for quinolone antibacterials in multiple pathogenic bacteria, including Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax. Given the significance of this type II topoisomerase as a drug target, it is critical to understand how quinolones interact with gyrase and how specific mutations lead to resistance. However, these important issues have yet to be addressed for a canonical gyrase. Therefore, we utilized a mechanistic approach to characterize interactions of quinolones with wild-type B. anthracis gyrase and enzymes containing the most common quinolone resistance mutations. Results indicate that clinically relevant quinolones interact with the enzyme through a water-metal ion bridge in which a noncatalytic divalent metal ion is chelated by the C3/C4 keto acid of the drug. In contrast to other bacterial type II topoisomerases that have been examined, the bridge is anchored to gyrase primarily through a single residue (Ser85). Substitution of groups at the quinolone C7 and C8 positions generated drugs that were less dependent on the water-metal ion bridge and overcame resistance. Thus, by analyzing the interactions of drugs with type II topoisomerases from individual bacteria, it may be possible to identify specific quinolone derivatives that can overcome target-mediated resistance in important pathogenic species.
Gyrase appears to be the primary cellular target for quinolone antibacterials in multiple pathogenic bacteria, including Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax. Given the significance of this type II topoisomerase as a drug target, it is critical to understand how quinolones interact with gyrase and how specific mutations lead to resistance. However, these important issues have yet to be addressed for a canonical gyrase. Therefore, we utilized a mechanistic approach to characterize interactions of quinolones with wild-type B. anthracisgyrase and enzymes containing the most common quinolone resistance mutations. Results indicate that clinically relevant quinolones interact with the enzyme through a water-metal ion bridge in which a noncatalytic divalent metal ion is chelated by the C3/C4 keto acid of the drug. In contrast to other bacterial type II topoisomerases that have been examined, the bridge is anchored to gyrase primarily through a single residue (Ser85). Substitution of groups at the quinolone C7 and C8 positions generated drugs that were less dependent on the water-metal ion bridge and overcame resistance. Thus, by analyzing the interactions of drugs with type II topoisomerases from individual bacteria, it may be possible to identify specific quinolone derivatives that can overcome target-mediated resistance in important pathogenic species.
Quinolones are among the most
commonly prescribed antibacterials worldwide and are used to treat
infections caused by a broad spectrum of Gram-negative and Gram-positive
bacteria in humans and animals.[1−7] The cellular targets for quinolones are the bacterial type II topoisomerases,
gyrase and topoisomerase IV.[2,5,8,9]Gyrase functions ahead of
replication forks and transcription complexes
to alleviate torsional stress induced by DNA overwinding and also
modulates the overall level of DNA supercoiling in the bacterial genome.[10−12] Although topoisomerase IV may be involved in regulating DNA over-
and underwinding, its primary function is to remove knots and tangles
formed by recombination and replication.[10,13−19] The two enzymes display sequence homology and function as heterotetramers
(GyrA2GyrB2 and GrlA2GrlB2 for Gram-positive gyrase and topoisomerase IV, respectively).[10,20] To perform their critical physiological functions, gyrase and topoisomerase
IV induce transient double-stranded breaks in the DNA backbone. During
the DNA cleavage event, the enzymes covalently attach to the newly
generated 5′-termini via active-site tyrosine residues. These
covalent enzyme-cleaved DNA complexes are termed “cleavage
complexes”.[6−8,12,21−23]Quinolones act by stabilizing cleavage complexes.[7,8,24−27] As replication forks or other
DNA-tracking systems encounter these protein-bound DNA roadblocks,
transient cleavage complexes are converted to nonligatable strand
breaks that must be repaired by DNA damage response pathways. At cytotoxic
concentrations, quinolones overwhelm the bacteria with DNA strand
breaks and trigger cell death.Although gyrase and topoisomerase
IV are both targets for quinolones,
the relative contributions of each enzyme to cytotoxicity appear to
be both species- and drug-dependent.[7,28−33] As a generalization, gyrase is the primary cellular target for most
quinolones in Gram-negative species, whereas topoisomerase IV plays
a more important role in many Gram-positive bacteria. This trend notwithstanding,
on the basis of laboratory studies in which quinolone-resistant cultures
were selected, gyrase appears to be the primary target for clinically
relevant quinolones in Bacillus anthracis, a Gram-positive
organism that is the causative agent of anthrax.[34−36]Unfortunately,
the continued clinical efficacy of quinolones is
threatened by the rising prevalence of resistance, which has been
reported in nearly every infection treated with these drugs.[4,5,7] Quinolone resistance is usually
associated with mutations in gyrase and/or topoisomerase IV.[2,5−8,33,35−38] For both enzymes, the most common resistance-conferring mutations
occur at a highly conserved serine residue in the A subunit and, to
a lesser extent, an acidic residue four amino acids downstream (originally
described as Ser83 and Glu87 in Escherichia coligyrase).[5,7,37,39−42] Despite the prevalence of these mutations across a broad spectrum
of quinolone-resistant isolates, the mechanistic basis by which they
led to resistance remained an enigma for decades.The first
report proposing a potential mechanism by which the serine
and acidic residues mediate quinolone action and resistance described
the structure of a cleavage complex formed by Acinetobacter
baumannii topoisomerase IV in the presence of the quinolonemoxifloxacin.[27] Although it had long been
known that quinolones chelate divalent metal ions,[43] the relevance of this chelation to drug–enzyme interactions
was never addressed. The A. baumannii topoisomerase
IV structure was the first to capture the drug-bound metal ion, a
noncatalytic magnesium, which was chelated by the C3/C4 keto acid
of moxifloxacin. In this structure, the bound metal ion was coordinated
to four water molecules, and two of these water molecules appeared
to form hydrogen bonds with the serine and acidic residues. However,
because three other contemporary structures did not capture the metal
ion,[24−26] the basis of quinolone–topoisomerase IV interactions
remained unclear.To determine relationships between the reported
structures and
quinolone function, a biochemical approach was used to analyze interactions
between quinolones and wild-type and quinolone-resistant B.
anthracis and E. coli topoisomerase IV.[44−46] This series of reports confirmed the existence of a “water–metal
ion bridge” between quinolones and topoisomerase IV and demonstrated
its function in mediating drug–enzyme interactions. These studies
provided strong evidence that the serine and acidic residues anchored
the quinolone to the enzyme through the water–metal ion bridge
and that mutations at either residue caused quinolone resistance by
disrupting the function of the bridge. Although B. anthracis and E. coli topoisomerase IV both utilize the bridge
and require it for drug function, the bridge appears to play different
roles in mediating the actions of quinolones in the two species. In B. anthracis topoisomerase IV, the bridge is required for
the binding of quinolones to the enzyme, and loss of either bridge
anchor dramatically decreases the affinity of the drug.[44,45] Conversely, in E. coli topoisomerase IV, the loss
of either bridge anchor has little effect on quinolone binding.[46] This finding strongly suggests that the water–metal
ion bridge is used for positioning the drug within its binding pocket
in an orientation that stabilizes cleavage complexes.Recent
biochemical and structural studies extended work on the
water–metal ion bridge to Mycobacterium tuberculosisgyrase.[47,48] Once again, these studies demonstrated the
existence of the bridge, its role in mediating quinolone–enzyme
interactions, and how disruption of the bridge causes resistance.
However, compared to most bacterial type II topoisomerases, M. tuberculosis gyrase is unusual in two respects. First,
it lacks the highly conserved serine residue and depends solely on
the acidic residue to anchor the bridge.[47,48] Second, because M. tuberculosis does not encode
topoisomerase IV, its gyrase is functionally distinct from “canonical”
gyrases because it must carry out the cellular activities of both
bacterial type II topoisomerases.[49,50] Thus, it is
not obvious whether quinolone interactions described for this enzyme
reflect those of topoisomerase IV or are also inherent to canonical
gyrase.Given the importance of gyrase as the primary target
for quinolones
in many pathogenic species, it is critical to understand how these
drugs interact with a canonical enzyme and how specific mutations
lead to resistance. Because it is not yet known whether quinolones
interact with a canonical gyrase through the water–metal ion
bridge, we examined potential bridge function in B. anthracisgyrase. Results indicate that clinically relevant quinolones rely
on the water–metal ion bridge to bind to the enzyme. However,
in contrast to topoisomerase IV and M. tuberculosis gyrase, the bridge is anchored primarily through the serine residue.
Finally, by introducing additional drug–enzyme interactions
that are not mediated through the water–metal ion bridge, it
is possible to overcome resistance.
Materials and Methods
Enzymes
and Materials
Wild-type B. anthracisgyrase
subunits (GyrA and GyrB) were expressed and purified using
a modification[45] of a previously published
protocol.[51] Genes were amplified via polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) from chromosomal DNA of the Sterne strain of B. anthracis. PCR products were cloned into the pET21b vector,
which added an N-terminal six-His tag to each protein subunit. The
GyrAS85L, GyrAS85F, GyrAE89K, and
GyrAE89A constructs were generated using a QuikChange kit
(Stratagene). The identities of all constructs were confirmed by DNA
sequencing. Each subunit construct was individually transformed into E. coli strainBL21(DE3), and subunits were purified as
described previously.[45] Subunits were stored
in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl, 20% glycerol,
and 5 mM dithiothreitol and kept at −80 °C.Negatively
supercoiled pBR322 DNA was prepared from E. coli using
a Plasmid Mega Kit (Qiagen) as described by the manufacturer. Relaxed
pBR322 plasmid DNA was generated by treating negatively supercoiled
pBR322 with calf thymus topoisomerase I (Invitrogen) and purified
as described previously.[46]Ciprofloxacin
was obtained from LKT Laboratories, stored at 4 °C
as a 40 mM stock solution in 0.1 N NaOH, and diluted 5-fold with 10
mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9) immediately prior to use. Moxifloxacin was obtained
from LKT Laboratories and stored at 4 °C as a 20 mM stock solution
in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). 8-Methyl-cipro [1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-8-methyl-7-(1-piperazinyl)-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic
acid], 8-methoxy-cipro [1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-8-methoxy-7-(1-piperazinyl)-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic
acid], cipro-dione [3-amino-7-(1-piperazinyl)-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-2,4(1H,3H)-quinazolinedione], 8-H-moxi {1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-7-[(4aS,7aS)-octahydro-6H-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyridin-6-yl]-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid}, 8-methyl-moxi
{1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-8-methyl-7-[(4aS,7aS)-octahydro-6H-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyridin-6-yl]-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid}, moxi-dione
{3-amino-7-[(4aS,7aS)-octahydro-6H-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyridin-6-yl]-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-8-methoxy-2,4(1H,3H)-quinazolinedione}, 3′-(AM)P-quinolone
{1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-8-methyl-7-[(3S)-3-(aminomethyl)-1-pyrrolidinyl]-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid},
and 3′-(AM)P-dione {3-amino-7-[(3S)-3-(aminomethyl)-1-pyrrolidinyl]-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-8-methyl-2,4(1H,3H)-quinazolinedione} were synthesized
as reported previously.[44,52] 8-Methyl-cipro and
8-methoxy-cipro were stored at −20 °C as 40 mM stock solutions
in 0.1 N NaOH and diluted 5-fold with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9) immediately
prior to use. All other compounds were stored at 4 °C as 20 mM
stock solutions in 100% DMSO. All other chemicals were analytical
reagent grade.
DNA Supercoiling
DNA supercoiling
assays were based
on previously published protocols.[44,47] GyrA and GyrB
(400 nM enzyme at a 1:2 GyrA:GyrB ratio) were incubated for 5 min
at 37 °C in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 350 mM KGlu, and 100 μg/mL
bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) and then diluted 2-fold with a mixture
containing DNA, Mg2+, and ATP to reach a final reaction
volume of 20 μL. The final concentrations of reactants were
200 nM gyrase, 5 nM relaxed DNA, and 1.5 mM ATP in 50 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 175 mM KGlu, and 50 μg/mL BSA.
Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for various times and
reactions were stopped by the addition of 3 μL of a mixture
of 0.77% SDS and 77.5 mM Na2EDTA. Samples were mixed with
2 μL of agarose loading dye [60% sucrose in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.9), 0.5% bromophenol blue, and 0.5% xylene cyanol FF] and subjected
to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels in 100 mM Tris-borate (pH 8.3)
and 2 mM EDTA. Gels were stained with 1 μg/mL ethidium bromide
for 30 min. DNA bands were visualized with medium-range ultraviolet
light on an Alpha Innotech digital imaging system.
DNA Cleavage
DNA cleavage reactions were based on the
procedure of Aldred et al.[44] Reaction mixtures
contained 500 nM wild-type GyrA, GyrAS85L, GyrAS85F, GyrAE89K, or GyrAE89Agyrase at a 1:2 GyrA:GyrB
ratio and 10 nM negatively supercoiled pBR322 in a total volume of
20 μL of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM KGlu, 5 mM MgCl2, and 50 μg/mL BSA. In some cases, a range of MgCl2 concentrations (0–3 mM) was tested or MgCl2 was replaced with BaCl2 (2 mM), NiCl2 (1 mM),
or MnCl2 (1 mM). Alternatively, MgCl2 was replaced
with CaCl2 (20 mM), and a range of enzyme concentrations
was tested. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 30
min. Enzyme–DNA cleavage complexes were trapped by adding 2
μL of 5% SDS followed by 2 μL of 250 mM Na2EDTA and 2 μL of 0.8 mg/mL Proteinase K. Reaction mixtures
were incubated at 45 °C for 30 min to digest the enzyme. Samples
were mixed with 2 μL of agarose loading dye and incubated at
45 °C for 2 min before being loaded on the gels. Reaction products
were subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels in 40 mM Tris-acetate
(pH 8.3), 2 mM Na2EDTA, and 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide
and visualized as described above. DNA cleavage was monitored by the
conversion of supercoiled plasmid to linear molecules and quantified
by comparison to a control reaction in which an equal mass of DNA
was digested by EcoRI (New England BioLabs).In assays that monitored competition between ciprofloxacin (0–50
μM), moxifloxacin (0–50 μM), cipro-dione (0–250
μM), or moxi-dione (0–250 μM) and 3′-(AM)P-dione
(5 μM), drugs were added simultaneously to reaction mixtures.
The percent DNA cleavage induced by the competing drug only was subtracted
from the percent DNA cleavage induced by 3′-(AM)P-dione. DNA
cleavage levels were then normalized to levels seen with 3′-(AM)P-dione
alone (set to 1.0). The competition studies were used to assess the
relative abilities of different drugs to interact with a series of
wild-type gyrase and mutant enzymes. Quinolones have been shown to
bind to individual subunits of gyrase, to DNA, to an enzyme–DNA
complex in which the enzyme is not capable of cleaving the DNA, and
to the enzyme–DNA cleavage complex.[53−56] At any given time, the DNA cleavage
complex (which is the complex of interest) represents a relatively
small percentage of the total gyrase in reaction mixtures. Thus, we
used a competition assay that specifically provides information about
how drugs interact with cleavage complexes. Utilizing 3′-(AM)P-dione
(which induced nearly identical high levels of DNA cleavage with each
of the mutant enzymes) as the drug being competed out provided an
“internal” standard for each competition experiment
that normalized results from the wild-type and mutant enzymes.
Results
and Discussion
Characterization of Wild-Type B.
anthracis Gyrase
and GyrA Mutants
As reported for other bacterial species,
the most common gyrase mutations in quinolone-resistant strains of B. anthracis are found at the conserved serine and glutamic
acid residues (GyrAS85 and GyrAE89). In laboratory
strains selected for resistance against ciprofloxacin and/or moxifloxacin
(two widely prescribed quinolone antibacterials), approximately 80%
of the isolates carried a GyrAS85L mutation (either alone
or in combination with other gyrase/topoisomerase IV amino acid changes).[35,38] The only other mutation reported to cause resistance without any
other gyrase/topoisomerase IV changes was a GyrAE89K substitution.[35,38] Therefore, we focused our studies on gyrase containing these two
mutations. In addition, we characterized mutant enzymes carrying GyrAS85F or GyrAE89A. The S85F mutation recapitulates
the most common quinolone resistance mutation seen in B. anthracis topoisomerase IV, which has been examined previously.[44] This mutation is not observed in gyrase because
of differences in the codon used for the serine residue. The E89A
mutation represents a control for the charge change in GyrAE89K to determine whether resistance is due to the loss of glutamic acid
or the conversion of a negative to a positive charge at that position.As a first step toward comparing the wild-type and mutant enzymes,
we assessed their ability to supercoil relaxed DNA. As seen in Figure , the serine mutant
enzymes and the E89A mutant gyrase maintain a wild-type ability to
supercoil DNA. Consistent with previous reports, the overall catalytic
activity of the E89K mutant enzymes was decreased compared to that
of wild-type gyrase. This may be the reason why mutations at this
position are observed less frequently than those at the serine residue.
Figure 1
DNA supercoiling
activities of wild-type B. anthracis gyrase and mutant
enzymes. A time course is shown for the introduction
of negative supercoils into relaxed DNA by wild-type gyrase (top),
enzymes with S85L and S85F mutations (middle), and enzymes with E89K
and E89A mutations (bottom). Positions of nicked, relaxed (Rel), and
negatively supercoiled [(−)SC] DNA are marked on the top image.
Gel images are representative of at least three independent experiments.
DNA supercoiling
activities of wild-type B. anthracisgyrase and mutant
enzymes. A time course is shown for the introduction
of negative supercoils into relaxed DNA by wild-type gyrase (top),
enzymes with S85L and S85F mutations (middle), and enzymes with E89K
and E89A mutations (bottom). Positions of nicked, relaxed (Rel), and
negatively supercoiled [(−)SC] DNA are marked on the top image.
Gel images are representative of at least three independent experiments.Because quinolones kill cells
primarily by increasing levels of
gyrase- and/or topoisomerase IV-mediated DNA cleavage, we examined
the ability of the enzymes discussed above to cleave DNA in the absence
of drugs (Figure ).
CaCl2 was used instead of MgCl2 in these reactions
because this metal ion increases baseline levels of cleavage mediated
by type II topoisomerases without affecting other properties of the
DNA scission reaction.[44,57−60] All of the mutant enzymes displayed
an activity similar to or higher than that of wild-type gyrase. These
DNA cleavage patterns are similar to those reported for the corresponding
mutations in topoisomerase IV[44,45] and strongly suggest
that quinolone resistance in B. anthracisgyrase
is not due to a general loss of enzymatic activity.
Figure 2
DNA cleavage activities
of wild-type B. anthracis gyrase and mutant enzymes.
The abilities of wild-type (black), S85L
(blue), S85F (orange), E89K (red), and E89A (green) gyrase to cleave
DNA in the absence of drugs are shown. Error bars represent the standard
deviation of at least three independent experiments.
DNA cleavage activities
of wild-type B. anthracisgyrase and mutant enzymes.
The abilities of wild-type (black), S85L
(blue), S85F (orange), E89K (red), and E89A (green) gyrase to cleave
DNA in the absence of drugs are shown. Error bars represent the standard
deviation of at least three independent experiments.
Effects of Quinolones and Related Compounds
on DNA Cleavage
Mediated by Wild-Type Gyrase and Mutant Enzymes
Although
GyrA mutations at S85 and E89 have been observed in quinolone-resistant B. anthracis cultures, a direct causal link between these
mutations and quinolone resistance in gyrase has yet to be established.
Therefore, we determined the ability of ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin
to enhance DNA cleavage mediated by wild-type, S85L, S85F, E89K, and
E89Agyrase. The S85L, S85F, and E89K mutant enzymes all displayed
high resistance to both quinolones (Figures and 4). These mutations
decreased the relative potencies of the drugs >10-fold. The mutations
had a weaker effect on the potency of moxifloxacin as compared to
ciprofloxacin. At 250 μM, moxifloxacin could induce levels of
cleavage with the mutant enzymes close to those generated with wild-type
gyrase and 20 μM drug (the highest drug concentration that could
be used without producing multiple cleavage events per plasmid). In
contrast, ciprofloxacin could not induce wild-type levels of cleavage
with the mutant enzymes, even at concentrations as high as 500 μM.
Figure 3
Effects
of ciprofloxacin on DNA cleavage mediated by wild-type
gyrase and mutant enzymes. A representative gel of DNA cleavage induced
by wild-type gyrase in the presence of ciprofloxacin is shown (top).
The gel includes a DNA control in the absence of enzyme (DC) and DNA
digested by EcoRI (EcoRI). The positions
of nicked, linear, and negatively supercoiled [(−)SC] DNA are
indicated. Graphs show the abilities of wild-type (black), S85L (blue),
S85F (orange), E89K (red), and E89A (green) gyrase to cleave DNA in
the presence of ciprofloxacin over either low (left) or high (right)
concentration ranges. The structure of ciprofloxacin is shown in the
right panel. Error bars represent the standard deviation of at least
three independent experiments.
Figure 4
Effects of moxifloxacin on DNA cleavage mediated by wild-type gyrase
and mutant enzymes. A representative gel of DNA cleavage induced by
wild-type gyrase in the presence of moxifloxacin is shown (top). The
gel includes a DNA control in the absence of enzyme (DC) and DNA digested
by EcoRI (EcoRI). The positions
of nicked, linear, and negatively supercoiled [(−)SC] DNA are
indicated. Graphs show the abilities of wild-type (black), S85L (blue),
S85F (orange), E89K (red), and E89A (green) gyrase to cleave DNA in
the presence of moxifloxacin over either low (left) or high (right)
concentration ranges. The structure of moxifloxacin is shown in the
right panel. Error bars represent the standard deviation of at least
three independent experiments.
Effects
of ciprofloxacin on DNA cleavage mediated by wild-type
gyrase and mutant enzymes. A representative gel of DNA cleavage induced
by wild-type gyrase in the presence of ciprofloxacin is shown (top).
The gel includes a DNA control in the absence of enzyme (DC) and DNA
digested by EcoRI (EcoRI). The positions
of nicked, linear, and negatively supercoiled [(−)SC] DNA are
indicated. Graphs show the abilities of wild-type (black), S85L (blue),
S85F (orange), E89K (red), and E89A (green) gyrase to cleave DNA in
the presence of ciprofloxacin over either low (left) or high (right)
concentration ranges. The structure of ciprofloxacin is shown in the
right panel. Error bars represent the standard deviation of at least
three independent experiments.Effects of moxifloxacin on DNA cleavage mediated by wild-type gyrase
and mutant enzymes. A representative gel of DNA cleavage induced by
wild-type gyrase in the presence of moxifloxacin is shown (top). The
gel includes a DNA control in the absence of enzyme (DC) and DNA digested
by EcoRI (EcoRI). The positions
of nicked, linear, and negatively supercoiled [(−)SC] DNA are
indicated. Graphs show the abilities of wild-type (black), S85L (blue),
S85F (orange), E89K (red), and E89A (green) gyrase to cleave DNA in
the presence of moxifloxacin over either low (left) or high (right)
concentration ranges. The structure of moxifloxacin is shown in the
right panel. Error bars represent the standard deviation of at least
three independent experiments.The E89K mutation introduces a negative to positive change
in the
vicinity of quinolone binding. To determine whether resistance associated
with this mutation is due to the loss of the glutamic acid or to the
introduction of an opposite charge at this position, we examined the
effects of quinolones on DNA cleavage mediated by GyrAE89Agyrase (Figures and 4). Unlike the other mutants examined,
this enzyme displayed no resistance to either ciprofloxacin or moxifloxacin.
This implies that the basis for quinolone resistance caused by the
E89K mutation is the disruptive change in charge. Alternatively, the
increased length of the lysine side chain may contribute steric effects.
This is in marked contrast to results with B. anthracis topoisomerase IV, in which the equivalent E → K and E →
A mutations displayed similar levels of resistance.[45] These findings suggest potentially important differences
in the way that quinolones interact with gyrase and topoisomerase
IV in B. anthracis.In addition to ciprofloxacin
and moxifloxacin, we also examined
the activity of 3′-(AM)P-quinolone against the wild-type and
mutant enzymes. Unlike the C7 groups of clinically relevant quinolones,
on the basis of crystallography and docking studies, the 3′-(AM)P
substituent can interact directly with a glutamic acid residue in
GyrB, which would correspond to Glu472 in B. anthracis GyrB.[61,62] This interaction potentially obviates the
requirement for the proposed water–metal ion bridge in mediating
drug–enzyme interactions.[44−46,52] Consistent with this hypothesis, 3′-(AM)P-quinolone displayed
high activity against all of the mutant enzymes with little change
in potency compared to that of the wild type (Figure , top left). Even when the 3′-(AM)P
group was moved to a quinazolinedione skeleton (which lacks the C3/C4
keto acid required to form a water–metal ion bridge), the compound
retained high activity against wild-type gyrase as well as quinolone-resistant
mutant enzymes (Figure , top right). Conversely, when the C7/C8 substituents of ciprofloxacin
and moxifloxacin (piperazinyl/H and diazabicyclononyl/methoxyl groups,
respectively) were transferred to a quinazolinedione core, the resulting
diones lost the majority of their activity against all of the enzymes,
including the wild-type gyrase (Figure , bottom). These findings with “cipro-dione”
and “moxi-dione” emphasize the importance of the C3/C4
keto acid in mediating the activity of clinically relevant quinolones
against B. anthracisgyrase.
Figure 5
Effects of 3′-(AM)P-quinolone
and quinazolinediones on DNA
cleavage mediated by wild-type gyrase and mutant enzymes. The abilities
of wild-type (black), S85L (blue), S85F (orange), E89K (red), and
E89A (green) gyrase to cleave DNA in the presence of 3′-(AM)P-quinolone
(top left), 3′-(AM)P-dione (top right), cipro-dione (bottom
left), and moxi-dione (bottom right) are shown. Drug structures are
shown in each panel. Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.
Effects of 3′-(AM)P-quinolone
and quinazolinediones on DNA
cleavage mediated by wild-type gyrase and mutant enzymes. The abilities
of wild-type (black), S85L (blue), S85F (orange), E89K (red), and
E89A (green) gyrase to cleave DNA in the presence of 3′-(AM)P-quinolone
(top left), 3′-(AM)P-dione (top right), cipro-dione (bottom
left), and moxi-dione (bottom right) are shown. Drug structures are
shown in each panel. Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.On the basis of results with B. anthracis(44,45) and E. coli(46) topoisomerase
IV, the critical role of the C3/C4 keto acid of quinolones may be
to facilitate binding to the enzyme or to position the drug appropriately
for stabilizing cleavage complexes. To distinguish between these possibilities,
we assessed the ability of cipro-dione and moxi-dione to compete with
5 μM 3′-(AM)P-dione in a DNA cleavage assay. If the C3/C4
keto acid is important for binding, the removal of this group should
prevent effective competition.[44,45] Conversely, if the
group is used to position the drug in the active site, the drugs should
compete efficiently.[46] As seen in Figure , neither drug could
substantially decrease levels of DNA cleavage induced by 3′-(AM)P-dione.
Even at concentrations as high as 250 μM (corresponding to a
50-fold molar excess), cipro-dione and moxi-dione decreased the level
of cleavage by <50%. These results provide evidence that the C3/C4
keto acid is crucial for the binding of clinically used quinolones
to B. anthracisgyrase.
Figure 6
Ability of cipro-dione
and moxi-dione to compete with 3′-(AM)P-dione
in DNA cleavage reactions mediated by wild-type gyrase. The abilities
of increasing concentrations of cipro-dione (black) and moxi-dione
(red) to compete with and prevent cleavage enhancement by 5 μM
3′-(AM)P-dione were determined. Drugs were added simultaneously
to reaction mixtures. The low levels of cleavage seen in the presence
of cipro-dione or moxi-dione alone were subtracted from the levels
of cleavage seen with both drugs, and the resulting corrected cleavage
level is plotted relative to the level observed with 3′-(AM)P-dione
alone (set to 1.0). Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.
Ability of cipro-dione
and moxi-dione to compete with 3′-(AM)P-dione
in DNA cleavage reactions mediated by wild-type gyrase. The abilities
of increasing concentrations of cipro-dione (black) and moxi-dione
(red) to compete with and prevent cleavage enhancement by 5 μM
3′-(AM)P-dione were determined. Drugs were added simultaneously
to reaction mixtures. The low levels of cleavage seen in the presence
of cipro-dione or moxi-dione alone were subtracted from the levels
of cleavage seen with both drugs, and the resulting corrected cleavage
level is plotted relative to the level observed with 3′-(AM)P-dione
alone (set to 1.0). Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.
Evidence of a Water–Metal Ion Bridge in Mediating Interactions
between Clinically Relevant Quinolones and B. anthracis Gyrase
The importance of the C3/C4 keto acid for drug binding
coupled with the effects of the resistance mutations strongly suggest
that B. anthracisgyrase utilizes the water–metal
ion bridge to mediate interactions with quinolones. Therefore, three
approaches were used to determine whether this was the case. First,
we examined the requirement for metal ions to support quinolone-stabilized
DNA cleavage mediated by wild-type gyrase. Type II topoisomerases
use a two-metal ion mechanism to mediate DNA cleavage and religation.[59,60,63−65] Although B. anthracisgyrase could utilize a variety of metal ions
other than Mg2+ to support DNA scission (data not shown),
not all ions could support DNA cleavage induced by quinolones. For
example, as seen in Figure , ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin could not induce cleavage
in the presence of Ba2+ or Ni2+. In contrast,
substantial levels of cleavage were observed with 3′-(AM)P-dione,
which does not require a metal ion to enhance DNA cleavage. These
findings indicate that quinolones require a noncatalytic divalent
metal ion in addition to those at the active site of the enzyme to
function against B. anthracisgyrase.
Figure 7
Effects of alternative
metal ions on drug-induced DNA cleavage
mediated by wild-type gyrase. The abilities of ciprofloxacin (black),
moxifloxacin (red), and 3′-(AM)P-dione (blue) to induce cleavage
by wild-type gyrase in the presence of 2 mM Ba2+ (left)
or 1 mM Ni2+ (right) are shown. Error bars represent the
standard deviation of at least three independent experiments.
Effects of alternative
metal ions on drug-induced DNA cleavage
mediated by wild-type gyrase. The abilities of ciprofloxacin (black),
moxifloxacin (red), and 3′-(AM)P-dione (blue) to induce cleavage
by wild-type gyrase in the presence of 2 mM Ba2+ (left)
or 1 mM Ni2+ (right) are shown. Error bars represent the
standard deviation of at least three independent experiments.Second, we determined whether
mutations at S85 or E89 of GyrA altered
the metal ion requirements for quinolone-induced DNA cleavage. In
the presence of Mg2+, high quinolone concentrations could
(at least partially) overcome drug resistance with the S85L and E89K
mutants (see Figures and 4). However, in the presence of Mn2+, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin could not induce cleavage
with these mutant enzymes (Figure ). This finding is despite the fact that Mn2+ supported the activity of both quinolones against the wild-type
enzyme and the nonresistant E89A mutant and also supported the activity
of 3′-(AM)P-dione against all of the enzymes examined. The
finding that the quinolone-resistant S85L and E89K mutations restrict
the variety of metal ions that clinically relevant quinolones can
use to enhance DNA cleavage further implicates a role for a noncatalytic
divalent metal ion in mediating interactions between the drug and B. anthracisgyrase.
Figure 8
Effects of Mn2+ on drug-induced
DNA cleavage mediated
by wild-type gyrase and mutant enzymes. The abilities of ciprofloxacin
(black), moxifloxacin (red), and 3′-(AM)P-dione (blue) to induce
cleavage by wild-type (top left), S85L (top right), E89K (bottom left),
or E89A (bottom right) gyrase in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ are shown. Error bars represent the standard deviation of at least
three independent experiments.
Effects of Mn2+ on drug-induced
DNA cleavage mediated
by wild-type gyrase and mutant enzymes. The abilities of ciprofloxacin
(black), moxifloxacin (red), and 3′-(AM)P-dione (blue) to induce
cleavage by wild-type (top left), S85L (top right), E89K (bottom left),
or E89A (bottom right) gyrase in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ are shown. Error bars represent the standard deviation of at least
three independent experiments.Third, we determined whether mutations at S85 and E89 affected
the affinity of the metal ion required for quinolone actions against
gyrase. These experiments monitored DNA cleavage levels over a range
of 0–3 mM Mg2+. To facilitate direct comparisons
between the wild-type and mutant enzymes, DNA cleavage levels were
normalized to those observed in reaction mixtures containing 3 mM
MgCl2. Compared to wild-type gyrase, the S85L and E89K
mutants decreased the affinity of Mg2+ in reaction mixtures
that contained ciprofloxacin (Figure , left). Concentrations of the metal ion required to
induce half-maximal and maximal levels of cleavage increased ∼2.5-fold.
In contrast, the E89A mutation, which does not cause quinolone resistance,
had no effect on metal ion usage. As a control, parallel titrations
were performed with 3′-(AM)P-dione (Figure , right). No decrease in metal ion affinity
was observed with any of the mutant enzymes. In fact, the quinazolinedione
required lower levels of Mg2+ with the E89 mutants.
Figure 9
Effects of
GyrA mutants on Mg2+ concentrations required
to support maximal levels of drug-induced DNA cleavage. Results are
shown for ciprofloxacin (left) and 3′-(AM)P-dione (right) with
wild-type (black), S85L (blue), E89K (red), or E89A (green) gyrase.
Cleavage levels with each drug–enzyme pair were normalized
to levels observed with 3 mM MgCl2 (set to 1.0). Error
bars represent the standard deviation of at least three independent
experiments.
Effects of
GyrA mutants on Mg2+ concentrations required
to support maximal levels of drug-induced DNA cleavage. Results are
shown for ciprofloxacin (left) and 3′-(AM)P-dione (right) with
wild-type (black), S85L (blue), E89K (red), or E89A (green) gyrase.
Cleavage levels with each drug–enzyme pair were normalized
to levels observed with 3 mM MgCl2 (set to 1.0). Error
bars represent the standard deviation of at least three independent
experiments.The studies described
above indicate that clinically relevant quinolones
such as ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin require a divalent metal ion
for their actions and that resistance mutations restrict the usage
and decrease the affinity of the coordinating metal ion. Taken together,
these findings provide strong evidence that interactions of these
quinolones with B. anthracisgyrase are mediated
by a water–metal ion bridge. However, these results point to
an important distinction between the amino acids used to anchor the
bridges in B. anthracisgyrase and topoisomerase
IV. Whereas the serine residue is a critical bridge anchor in both
enzymes, it appears that the glutamic acid residue is used only in
topoisomerase IV. This is based on the fact that the conversion of
this residue to an alanine causes resistance and altered utilization
of metal ions in topoisomerase IV[45] but
does neither in gyrase.
Role of the Water–Metal Ion Bridge
in Mediating Quinolone–Gyrase
Interactions
Two lines of evidence imply that the water–metal
ion bridge is used primarily to mediate binding interactions between
clinically relevant quinolones and B. anthracisgyrase:
high concentrations of quinolones can overcome the effects of resistance
mutations (Figures and 4), and removal of the C3/C4 keto acid
greatly diminishes the affinity of the drug for the enzyme (Figure ). To determine whether
this is the case, a competition assay that utilized S85L or E89Kgyrase
was employed. These experiments monitored the ability of 0–50
μM ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin to compete with DNA cleavage
induced by 5 μM 3′-(AM)P-dione. These three drugs display
similar potencies against wild-type B. anthracisgyrase
(see Figures –5). Therefore, if the resistance mutations do not
reduce drug affinity, cleavage levels induced by 3′-(AM)P-dione
should decrease by 50% at ∼5 μM quinolone. As seen in Figure , this was not
the case. Even at a 10-fold molar excess of ciprofloxacin or moxifloxacin,
the level of DNA scission decreased <50%. These results provide
strong evidence that the water–metal ion bridge provides the
primary binding contact between clinically relevant quinolones and B. anthracisgyrase.
Figure 10
Abilities of ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin
to compete with 3′-(AM)P-dione
in DNA cleavage reactions mediated by quinolone-resistant enzymes.
The abilities of increasing concentrations of ciprofloxacin (left)
and moxifloxacin (right) to compete with and prevent cleavage enhancement
by 5 μM 3′-(AM)P-dione with S85L (blue) and E89K (red)
gyrase were determined. Drugs were added simultaneously to reaction
mixtures. The levels of cleavage seen in the presence of ciprofloxacin
or moxifloxacin alone were subtracted from the levels of cleavage
seen with both drugs, and the resulting corrected cleavage level is
plotted relative to the level observed with 3′-(AM)P-dione
alone (set to 1.0). Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.
Abilities of ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin
to compete with 3′-(AM)P-dione
in DNA cleavage reactions mediated by quinolone-resistant enzymes.
The abilities of increasing concentrations of ciprofloxacin (left)
and moxifloxacin (right) to compete with and prevent cleavage enhancement
by 5 μM 3′-(AM)P-dione with S85L (blue) and E89K (red)
gyrase were determined. Drugs were added simultaneously to reaction
mixtures. The levels of cleavage seen in the presence of ciprofloxacin
or moxifloxacin alone were subtracted from the levels of cleavage
seen with both drugs, and the resulting corrected cleavage level is
plotted relative to the level observed with 3′-(AM)P-dione
alone (set to 1.0). Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.
Effects of the C8 Substituent on Quinolone Activity and Resistance
Previous studies with B. anthracis topoisomerase
IV[52] and M. tuberculosis gyrase[47] demonstrated that the substituent
at C8 can make important contributions to quinolone activity and have
the potential to overcome resistance caused by the most common mutations.
Therefore, we examined a series of ciprofloxacin- and moxifloxacin-based
compounds containing a -H, -methyl, or -methoxyl substituent at C8
for their activity against wild-type, S85L, and E89Kgyrase. Compared
to ciprofloxacin (which contains a C8–H group), 8-methyl-cipro
and 8-methoxy-cipro displayed considerably higher potencies and efficacies
against the wild-type and mutant enzymes (Figure ). In fact, 8-methoxy-cipro could overcome
resistance at ∼20 μM drug. Although less striking, similar
results were seen with the moxifloxacin series (Figure ). Compared to the parent
compound (which contains a C8-methoxyl group), 8-H-moxi displayed
a much lower efficacy against all of the enzymes and could not overcome
resistance even at high concentrations. In contrast, 8-methyl-moxi
displayed high potency and efficacy that were similar to (or slightly
higher than) those of moxifloxacin. These results demonstrate that
the substituent at C8 affects the actions of quinolones against B. anthracisgyrase.
Figure 11
Effects of C8 substituents on ciprofloxacin-induced
DNA cleavage
mediated by wild-type gyrase and quinolone-resistant mutants. The
abilities of low (left) or high (right) concentrations ranges of 8-methyl-ciprofloxacin
(top) and 8-methoxy-ciprofloxacin (bottom) to enhance cleavage mediated
by wild-type (black), S85L (blue), and E89K (red) gyrase were determined.
Cleavage induced by ciprofloxacin with wild-type gyrase is shown by
the dotted black line in the top left panel. Drug structures are shown
in the right panels. Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.
Figure 12
Effects of C8 substituents on moxifloxacin-induced DNA cleavage
mediated by wild-type gyrase and quinolone-resistant mutants. The
abilities of low (left) or high (right) concentrations ranges of 8-H-moxifloxacin
(top) and 8-methyl-moxifloxacin (bottom) to enhance cleavage mediated
by wild-type (black), S85L (blue), and E89K (red) gyrase were determined.
Cleavage induced by moxifloxacin with wild-type gyrase is shown by
the dotted black line in the top left panel. Drug structures are shown
in the right panels. Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.
Effects of C8 substituents on ciprofloxacin-induced
DNA cleavage
mediated by wild-type gyrase and quinolone-resistant mutants. The
abilities of low (left) or high (right) concentrations ranges of 8-methyl-ciprofloxacin
(top) and 8-methoxy-ciprofloxacin (bottom) to enhance cleavage mediated
by wild-type (black), S85L (blue), and E89K (red) gyrase were determined.
Cleavage induced by ciprofloxacin with wild-type gyrase is shown by
the dotted black line in the top left panel. Drug structures are shown
in the right panels. Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.Effects of C8 substituents on moxifloxacin-induced DNA cleavage
mediated by wild-type gyrase and quinolone-resistant mutants. The
abilities of low (left) or high (right) concentrations ranges of 8-H-moxifloxacin
(top) and 8-methyl-moxifloxacin (bottom) to enhance cleavage mediated
by wild-type (black), S85L (blue), and E89K (red) gyrase were determined.
Cleavage induced by moxifloxacin with wild-type gyrase is shown by
the dotted black line in the top left panel. Drug structures are shown
in the right panels. Error bars represent the standard deviation of
at least three independent experiments.
Conclusions
The findings presented above provide strong
evidence that the primary
interaction between clinically relevant quinolones and B.
anthracis gyrase occurs through the water–metal ion
bridge (Figure ).
Furthermore, the function of the bridge in gyrase is to facilitate
binding of the drug to the enzyme. This is as opposed to E.
coli topoisomerase IV, which uses the bridge to position
quinolones but does not require it for drug binding.[46]
Figure 13
Simplified schematic of the water–metal ion bridge
used
to mediate interactions between quinolones and B. anthracis gyrase. Only interactions with the protein (and not DNA) are shown.
A representative quinolone core is depicted in black, the noncatalytic
Mg2+ in orange, water molecules in blue, and the serine
and acidic residues in green. Blue lines indicate the octahedral coordination
sphere of the divalent metal ion interacting with four water molecules
and the C3/C4 keto acid of the quinolone. The green dashed lines represent
hydrogen bonds between the serine side chain hydroxyl group and the
water molecules. In contrast to B. anthracis and E. coli topoisomerase IV, the glutamic acid residue does
not appear to act as a bridge anchor. Adapted from ref (44).
Simplified schematic of the water–metal ion bridge
used
to mediate interactions between quinolones and B. anthracisgyrase. Only interactions with the protein (and not DNA) are shown.
A representative quinolone core is depicted in black, the noncatalytic
Mg2+ in orange, water molecules in blue, and the serine
and acidic residues in green. Blue lines indicate the octahedral coordination
sphere of the divalent metal ion interacting with four water molecules
and the C3/C4 keto acid of the quinolone. The green dashed lines represent
hydrogen bonds between the serine side chain hydroxyl group and the
water molecules. In contrast to B. anthracis and E. coli topoisomerase IV, the glutamic acid residue does
not appear to act as a bridge anchor. Adapted from ref (44).The bridge “anchors” in B. anthracisgyrase are distinct from those in topoisomerase IV and in M. tuberculosis gyrase. In B. anthracis and E. coli topoisomerase IV, both the serine and
the glutamic acid residues are used to anchor the bridge, and loss
of either anchor causes quinolone resistance.[44,45] Because M. tuberculosis gyrase lacks the serine
residue, the only available anchor is the glutamic acid, so this residue
provides the principal contact for quinolone binding.[47] Conversely, in B. anthracisgyrase, the
water–metal ion bridge seems to be primarily coordinated through
the serine residue. In this case, quinolone resistance in gyrase harboring
an E89K mutation is likely due to the disruptive change in charge
rather than the loss of an anchor. These findings point to subtle,
but critical, differences in the drug binding pockets of gyrase and
topoisomerase IV from different species that give rise to distinct
quinolone interactions.In accord with the findings described
above, it is possible to
introduce interactions that overcome drug resistance differentially.
For example, changing the C8 substituent of ciprofloxacin (which is
the primary prophylactic and first-line drug used to treat anthrax)[66,67] from a hydrogen to a methoxyl group greatly improves the efficacy
of the drug against wild-type and quinolone-resistant B. anthracisgyrase. However, in M. tuberculosis gyrase, the
drug derivative that can best overcome resistance is the C8-methyl
form of moxifloxacin.[47]Taken together,
these results present an opportunity to shift the
paradigm for the development and use of new quinolones. Historically,
these drugs were developed as broad-spectrum antibacterials. However,
by analyzing the interactions of drugs with gyrase and topoisomerase
IV from individual bacteria, it should be possible to identify specific
quinolone derivatives that can overcome target-mediated resistance
in important pathogenic species.
Authors: I Brook; T B Elliott; H I Pryor; T E Sautter; B T Gnade; J H Thakar; G B Knudson Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: E L Zechiedrich; A B Khodursky; S Bachellier; R Schneider; D Chen; D M Lilley; N R Cozzarelli Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-03-17 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Elizabeth G Gibson; Alexandria A Oviatt; Monica Cacho; Keir C Neuman; Pan F Chan; Neil Osheroff Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Tyrell R Towle; Chaitanya A Kulkarni; Lisa M Oppegard; Bridget P Williams; Taylor A Picha; Hiroshi Hiasa; Robert J Kerns Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Elizabeth G Gibson; Tim R Blower; Monica Cacho; Ben Bax; James M Berger; Neil Osheroff Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 5.084