| Literature DB >> 28708303 |
E Chérot1,2, B Keren3,4,5, C Dubourg2,6, W Carré2, M Fradin1, A Lavillaureix3, A Afenjar7,8,9, L Burglen8,9, S Whalen8,9, P Charles3,4,7, I Marey3,4,7, S Heide3,4,7, A Jacquette3,4,7, D Heron3,4,7, D Doummar5,10,11, D Rodriguez5,10,11, T Billette de Villemeur10,12, M-L Moutard5,10, A Guët12, J Xavier13,14, D Périsse13, D Cohen13,14, F Demurger1, C Quélin1, C Depienne3,15, S Odent1,6, C Nava3,15, V David2,6, L Pasquier1,16, C Mignot3,4,5.
Abstract
Although whole-exome sequencing (WES) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), it remains expensive for some genetic centers. Commercialized panels comprising all OMIM-referenced genes called "medical exome" (ME) constitute an alternative strategy to WES, but its efficiency is poorly known. In this study, we report the experience of 2 clinical genetic centers using ME for diagnosis of NDDs. We recruited 216 consecutive index patients with NDDs in 2 French genetic centers, corresponded to the daily practice of the units and included non-syndromic intellectual disability (NSID, n = 33), syndromic ID (NSID = 122), pediatric neurodegenerative disorders (n = 7) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD, n = 54). We sequenced samples from probands and their parents (when available) with the Illumina TruSight One sequencing kit. We found pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 56 index patients, for a global diagnostic yield of 25.9%. The diagnosis yield was higher in patients with ID as the main diagnosis (32%) than in patients with ASD (3.7%). Our results suggest that the use of ME is a valuable strategy for patients with ID when WES cannot be used as a routine diagnosis tool.Entities:
Keywords: autism; intellectual disability; medical exome; molecular strategy
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28708303 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Genet ISSN: 0009-9163 Impact factor: 4.438