Literature DB >> 28707381

Radiation-associated lens changes in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Results from the IC-CATARACT (CATaracts Attributed to RAdiation in the CaTh lab) study.

Aris Karatasakis1, Harilaos S Brilakis2, Barbara A Danek1, Judit Karacsonyi1, Jose Roberto Martinez-Parachini1, Phuong-Khanh J Nguyen-Trong1, Aya J Alame1, Michele K Roesle1, Bavana V Rangan1, Kenneth Rosenfield3, Roxana Mehran4, Ehtisham Mahmud5, Charles E Chambers6, Subhash Banerjee1, Emmanouil S Brilakis1,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and the prevalence of lens changes in interventional cardiologists (ICs) and catheterization laboratory ("cath-lab") staff.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with the development of lens opacities. ICs and cath-lab staff can receive high doses of ionizing radiation without protection, and may thus be at risk for lens opacity formation.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at an interventional cardiology conference. Study participants completed a questionnaire pertaining to occupational exposure to radiation and potential confounders for the development of cataracts, followed by slit-lamp examination and grading of lens findings.
RESULTS: A total of 117 attendees participated in the study, including 99 (85%; 49 ± 11 years-old; 82% male) with occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and 18 (15%; 39 ± 12 years-old; 61% male) unexposed controls. The prevalence of overall cortical and posterior subcapsular lens changes (including subclinical findings) was higher in exposed participants compared with controls (47 vs. 17%, P = 0.015). Occupational exposure and age over 60 were independent predictors of lens changes (odds ratio [95% CI]: 6.07 [1.38-43.45] and 7.72 [1.60-43.34], respectively). The prevalence of frank opacities was low and similar between the two groups (14 vs. 6%, P = 0.461). Most lens findings consisted of subclinical changes in the periphery of the lens without impact on visual acuity.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with unexposed controls, ICs and cath-lab staff had a higher prevalence of lens changes that may be attributable to ionizing radiation exposure. While most of these changes were subclinical, they are important due to the potential to progress to clinical symptoms, highlighting the importance of minimizing staff radiation exposure.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract; catheterization; lens; occupational hazard; radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28707381     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  13 in total

1.  Cataract risk in US radiologic technologists assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Raquel Velazquez-Kronen; David Borrego; Ethel S Gilbert; Donald L Miller; Kirsten B Moysich; Jo L Freudenheim; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Mark P Little; Amy E Millen; Stephen Balter; Bruce H Alexander; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Occupational Doses to Medical Staff Performing or Assisting with Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures.

Authors:  David Borrego; Cari M Kitahara; Stephen Balter; Craig Yoder
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Effect of Instrument Navigation on C-arm Radiation and Time during Spinal Procedures: A Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Timothy Y Wang; Farah Hamouda; Vikram A Mehta; Eric W Sankey; Chester Yarbrough; Robert Lark; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

Review 4.  Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Nathan Lo; Jorge Antonio Gutierrez; Rajesh V Swaminathan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-24

5.  Catheter strategy to ease the procedure and reduce radiation exposure when requiring neck access.

Authors:  Rouven Kubicki; Johanna Hummel; René Höhn; Kevin Müller; Brigitte Stiller; Jochen Grohmann
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-06

Review 6.  Radiation-Induced Cerebro-Ophthalmic Effects in Humans.

Authors:  Konstantin N Loganovsky; Donatella Marazziti; Pavlo A Fedirko; Kostiantyn V Kuts; Katerina Y Antypchuk; Iryna V Perchuk; Tetyana F Babenko; Tetyana K Loganovska; Olena O Kolosynska; George Y Kreinis; Marina V Gresko; Sergii V Masiuk; Federico Mucci; Leonid L Zdorenko; Alessandra Della Vecchia; Natalia A Zdanevich; Natalia A Garkava; Raisa Y Dorichevska; Zlata L Vasilenko; Victor I Kravchenko; Nataliya V Drosdova
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-16

7.  Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure in Children with and without Fluoroscopy: A Comparison.

Authors:  S Ackermann; D Quandt; N Hagenbuch; O Niesse; M Christmann; W Knirsch; O Kretschmar
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-07       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Effectiveness of additional X-ray protection devices in reducing Scattered radiation in radial interventions: protocol of the ESPRESSO randomised trial.

Authors:  Remzi Anadol; Moritz Brandt; Nico Merz; Maike Knorr; Majid Ahoopai; Martin Geyer; Damian Krompiec; Phillip Wenzel; Thomas Münzel; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Combining Optimized Image Processing With Dual Axis Rotational Angiography: Toward Low-Dose Invasive Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Dimitri Buytaert; Benny Drieghe; Frédéric Van Heuverswyn; Jan De Pooter; Peter Gheeraert; Daniël De Wolf; Yves Taeymans; Klaus Bacher
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Sylvia Marie R Biso; Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.