Literature DB >> 28707362

Left atrial pressure and predictors of survival after percutaneous mitral paravalvular leak closure.

Elad Maor1, Claire E Raphael1, Sidakpal S Panaich1, Mohamad Alkhouli2, Allison Cabalka1, Donald J Hagler1, Peter M Pollak1, Guy S Reeder1, Mackram F Eleid1, Charanjit S Rihal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on the clinical utility of left atrial (LA) hemodynamic monitoring during percutaneous mitral interventions are limited.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between intraprocedural LA pressures during percutaneous mitral paravalvular leak (PVL) closure and long term survival.
METHODS: Patients who underwent mitral PVL repair with invasive LA pressure monitoring were divided at baseline to three tertiles based on their mean final LA pressure (<25%; 25-30%; >30% of mean systolic blood pressure). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: 134 patients (mean age 68 ± 12 years) were studied. Over 3 year mean follow-up, 81 (38%) patients died. The cumulative probability of death at 3 years was significantly higher among patients in the highest LA pressure tertile (56 ± 8% vs. 28 ± 5%, log rank P < 0.001). More than mild residual mitral regurgitation (MR) by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of death and patients in the highest LA pressure tertile had 2.2-fold higher mortality (P < 0.001 and = 0.003 respectively). After adjustment for residual MR by TEE, each 10% acute procedural reduction in LA pressures was associated with a significant 9% reduced risk of death (P = 0.023). Multivariate Cox regression with adjustment for multiple predictors of death showed that patients in lower LA pressure tertiles had 59% lower mortality (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Lower LA pressure following mitral PVL closure is an independent predictor of improved survival, even after adjustment for residual MR. LA pressure monitoring may be a useful tool for procedural guidance during mitral PVL closure.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  invasive hemodynamics; left atrial pressure; mitral valve; paravalvular leak; structural intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28707362     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

Review 1.  Paravalvular Leak in Structural Heart Disease.

Authors:  Kashish Goel; Mackram F Eleid
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Update on Devices for Diastolic Dysfunction: Options for a No Option Condition?

Authors:  Amit Gupta; Steven R Bailey
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Mitral Paravalvular Leaks in Human Heart.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wojtas; Michał Kozłowski; Wojciech Orciuch; Łukasz Makowski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Safety, Efficacy and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Treated with the Occlutech Paravalvular Leak Device for Significant Paravalvular Regurgitation.

Authors:  Eustaquio Maria Onorato; Francesco Alamanni; Manuela Muratori; Grzegorz Smolka; Wojtek Wojakowski; Piotr Pysz; Aleksejus Zorinas; Diana Zakarkaite; Hélène Eltchaninoff; Pierre-Yves Litzer; François Godart; Patrick Calvert; Christos Christou; Abdurashid Mussayev; Bindo Missiroli; Igor Buzaev; Salvatore Curello; Tullio Tesorio; Antonio Luca Bartorelli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.