Literature DB >> 28707207

Why published research is untrustworthy.

Gunnar Lose1, Niels Klarskov2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28707207     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  20 in total

1.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature.

Authors:  Charles Seife
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.

Authors:  Herbert W Marsh; Upali W Jayasinghe; Nigel W Bond
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2008-04

4.  China's medical research integrity questioned.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  [Peer review is not based on evidence, but on tradition and good intentions].

Authors:  Siri Vinther; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2013-01-07

6.  The scandal of poor medical research.

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-29

7.  The singapore statement on research integrity.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Adil E Shamoo
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.

Authors:  Erick H Turner; Annette M Matthews; Eftihia Linardatos; Robert A Tell; Robert Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature.

Authors:  Shareen A Iqbal; Joshua D Wallach; Muin J Khoury; Sheri D Schully; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature.

Authors:  Michael L Grieneisen; Minghua Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Do cancer stem cells exist? A pilot study combining a systematic review with the hierarchy-of-hypotheses approach.

Authors:  Isabelle Bartram; Jonathan M Jeschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.