Literature DB >> 28707178

Life-span retrieval of public events: Reminiscence bump for high-impact events, recency for others.

Ali I Tekcan1, Aysecan Boduroglu2, Aysu Mutlutürk2, Aslı Aktan Erciyes2.   

Abstract

Although substantial evidence exists showing a reliable reminiscence bump for personal events, data regarding retrieval distributions for public events have been equivocal. The primary aim of the present study was to address life-span retrieval distributions of different types of public events in comparison to personal events, and to test whether the existing accounts of the bump can explain the distribution of public events. We asked a large national sample to report the most important, happiest, and saddest personal events and the most important, happiest, saddest, most proud, most fearful, and most shameful public events. We found a robust bump corresponding to the third decade of life for the happiest and the most important positive but not for the saddest and most important negative personal events. For the most important public events, a bump emerged only for the two most frequently mentioned events. Distributions of public events cued with emotions were marked by recency. These results point to potential differences in retrieval of important personal and public events. While the life-script framework well accounts for the findings regarding important personal events, a chronologically retroactive search seem to guide retrieval of public events. Reminiscence bump observed for the two public events suggest that age-at-event affects recall of public events to the degree that the events are high-impact ones that dominate nation's collective memory. Results provide further evidence that the bump is not unitary and points to importance of event type and memory elicitation method with regard to competing explanations of the phenomenon.

Keywords:  Autobiographical memory; Collective memory; Life-span retrieval; Public events; Reminiscence bump

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28707178     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0724-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  30 in total

1.  Cultural life scripts structure recall from autobiographical memory.

Authors:  Dorthe Berntsen; David C Rubin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

2.  Autobiographical memory in normal aging and primary degenerative dementia (dementia of Alzheimer type).

Authors:  P Fromholt; S F Larsen
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-05

3.  Self-centered memories: the reminiscence bump and the self.

Authors:  Clare J Rathbone; Chris J A Moulin; Martin A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

4.  The transitional impact scale: assessing the material and psychological impact of life transitions.

Authors:  Connie Svob; Norman R Brown; John R Reddon; Tugba Uzer; Peter J Lee
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

5.  Things that go bump in your life: explaining the reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory.

Authors:  A Jansari; A J Parkin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1996-03

6.  In my era: evidence for the perception of a special period of the past.

Authors:  J R Sehulster
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1996-03

7.  The distribution of autobiographical memories across the lifespan.

Authors:  D C Rubin; M D Schulkind
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

8.  The reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory and for public events: A comparison across different cueing methods.

Authors:  Jonathan Koppel; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2014-12-20

9.  Does everything happen when you are young? Introducing the youth bias.

Authors:  Jonathan Koppel; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  The reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory: effects of age, gender, education, and culture.

Authors:  Steve M J Janssen; Antonio G Chessa; Jaap M J Murre
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Collective remembering and future forecasting during the COVID-19 pandemic: How the impact of COVID-19 affected the themes and phenomenology of global and national memories across 15 countries.

Authors:  Sezin Öner; Lynn Ann Watson; Zeynep Adıgüzel; İrem Ergen; Ezgi Bilgin; Antonietta Curci; Scott Cole; Manuel L de la Mata; Steve M J Janssen; Tiziana Lanciano; Ioanna Markostamou; Veronika Nourkova; Andrés Santamaría; Andrea Taylor; Krystian Barzykowski; Miguel Bascón; Christina Bermeitinger; Rosario Cubero-Pérez; Steven Dessenberger; Maryanne Garry; Sami Gülgöz; Ryan Hackländer; Lucrèce Heux; Zheng Jin; María Lojo; José Antonio Matías-García; Henry L Roediger; Karl Szpunar; Eylul Tekin; Oyku Uner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-07-12

2.  People from the U.S. and China think about their personal and collective future differently.

Authors:  Will Deng; Alexa K Rosenblatt; Thomas Talhelm; Adam L Putnam
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-07-20

3.  The impact of group identity on the interaction between collective memory and collective future thinking negativity: Evidence from a Turkish sample.

Authors:  Deniz Hacıbektaşoğlu; Ali I Tekcan; Reyyan Bilge; Aysecan Boduroglu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-06-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.