Literature DB >> 28707151

[Acceptance of medical apps and e‑books among German radiologists].

S Schleder1, L M Dendl2, C Niessen2, C Stroszczynski2, A G Schreyer2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Smartphones, tablet PCs, mobile applications (apps) and electronic book files (e-books) affect our lives in private and job-related settings. The aim of this study was to analyze the behavior of radiologists on smartphones, tablet PCs and e‑books and to investigate its effect on their daily work.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey containing of 23 questions was conducted using Survey Monkey© ( www.surveymonkey.com ). The invitation to the survey was done using the newsletter of the German Radiological Society (DRG). The acquired data was automatically stored by the software and then analyzed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: In total, 104 radiologists (29% female) participated in the online survey. Of these, 93% and 96.5% owned a smartphone or a tablet PC, respectively, and 72% and 67% used medical apps and e‑books, respectively. Through their use, 31% found moderate and 41% found enormous improvement in their daily work. A majority of participating radiologists would be willing to pay an increased user fee for optimized apps or e‑books.
CONCLUSION: With currently only moderate individual benefit of mobile medical apps and e‑books, there is a widespread need for optimally configured apps and e‑books with a correspondingly high market potential. KEY POINTS: (1) Radiologists use smartphones (93%) or tablet PCs (96.5%); (2) 72% of radiologists use a smartphone or tablet PC for medical material; (3) 53% of radiologists report significant assistance from or a high value of the mobile medical applications used; (4) There is a willingness to pay a license fee for optimized mobile applications or e‑books.

Keywords:  E-books; Medical apps; Smartphones; Tablet PCs

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28707151     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-017-0279-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  6 in total

1.  [Mobile IT: Possibilities and barriers of mHealth].

Authors:  B Böckmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Exploring the Usability of Mobile Apps Supporting Radiologists' Training in Diagnostic Decision Making.

Authors:  Min Soon Kim; Michael R Aro; Kraig J Lage; Kevin L Ingalls; Vivek Sindhwani; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  A long adolescence: when will medical apps come of age?

Authors:  Asher J Steene
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey.

Authors:  Karl Frederick Braekkan Payne; Heather Wharrad; Kim Watts
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Radiology smartphone applications; current provision and cautions.

Authors:  M A Rodrigues; A Visvanathan; J T Murchison; R R Brady
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-08-04

Review 6.  There's an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications.

Authors:  Warren Wiechmann; Daniel Kwan; Andrew Bokarius; Shannon L Toohey
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-02
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Use of medical apps and online platforms among German rheumatologists : Results of the 2016 and 2018 DGRh conference surveys and research conducted by rheumadocs].

Authors:  J Knitza; D Vossen; I Geffken; M Krusche; M Meyer; P Sewerin; A Kleyer; A J Hueber
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Decision-Making in the Pediatric Emergency Department-A Survey of Guidance Strategies among Residents.

Authors:  Sebastian Gaus; Jeremy Schmidt; Paul Lüse; Winfried Barthlen; Eckard Hamelmann; Hendrik Vossschulte
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.