Literature DB >> 28707096

[Medical quality standards for selected urological aids and devices : Consensus for patients with neurogenic urinary bladder dysfunction].

J Bremer1, B Domurath2, R Böthig3, A Kaufmann4, V Geng5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using the CE mark of therapeutic appliances is, on its own, not sufficient enough for their appropriate and effective application. In order to treat the patient successfully, not jeopardizing the success of the treatment, medical quality criteria for therapeutic appliances care are necessary to acceptably compensate for a patient's disabilities.
OBJECTIVES: Medical quality criteria are formulated for the most frequently used urological aids and devices, considering hygienic requirements, international literature and the practical experience of physicians and nurses with regard to the care of patients with neurogenic urinary bladder dysfunction.
METHODS: An expert group of urologists, surgeons, rehabilitation physicians and nurses has developed medical quality criteria via a structured consensus procedure. Developing these criteria, the group has taken into account current jurisprudence, the current resource directory of neurourological relevant aids, data from international literature and hygiene requirements.
RESULTS: Medical quality requirements are discussed and defined for selected groups of urological devices (single use catheters, indwelling catheters, external catheters, urine bags, templates and diapers as well as devices for the electrostimulation of nerves).
CONCLUSION: The presented quality requirements offer the possibility to stabilize quality of care with neurourological relevant therapeutic appliances. The catalogue of therapeutic appliances must be urgently updated. Urinal catheters for single use must be classified as an individual product group. Devices for anterior root stimulation and neuromodulation must be included in the resource directory. The incontinence severity classification needs to be reviewed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheter; Incontinence; Medical aids and devices; Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction; Quality criteria

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28707096     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0457-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  12 in total

1.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  The safety of medical devices containing DEHP plasticized PVC or other plasticizers on neonates and other groups possibly at risk (2015 update).

Authors:  Emanuela Testai; Philippe Hartemann; Suresh Chandra Rastogi; Ulrike Bernauer; Aldert Piersma; Wim De Jong; Hans Gulliksson; Richard Sharpe; Dirk Schubert; Eduardo Rodríguez-Farre
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 3.  [The relevance of catheterization in neurourology].

Authors:  R Böthig; H Burgdörfer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Can we build a better urinary catheter?

Authors:  C M Kunin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jan Krhut; Roman Zachoval; Phillip P Smith; Peter F W M Rosier; Ladislav Valanský; Alois Martan; Peter Zvara
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 6.  Urinary catheter policies for long-term bladder drainage.

Authors:  Barbara S Niël-Weise; Peterhans J van den Broek; Edina M K da Silva; Laercio A Silva
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

7.  Condom versus indwelling urinary catheters: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sanjay Saint; Samuel R Kaufman; Mary A M Rogers; Paul D Baker; Kathleen Ossenkop; Benjamin A Lipsky
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  [Objective and subjective requirement of aids and appliances in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction : Multicenter study to determinate the daily necessity of urological aids and appliances].

Authors:  J Bremer; R Böthig; B Domurath; J Kutzenberger; A Kaufmann; J Pretzer; J P Klask; V Geng; W Vance; I Kurze
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Definition of mild, moderate and severe incontinence on the 24-hour pad test.

Authors:  R O'Sullivan; E Karantanis; T L Stevermuer; W Allen; K H Moore
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Assessing variability of the 24-hour pad weight test in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Rena D Malik; Joshua A Cohn; Pauline A Fedunok; Doreen E Chung; Gregory T Bales
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Real Daily Need for Incontinence Aids and Appliances in Patients with Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction in a Community Setting in Germany.

Authors:  Ralf Böthig; Burkhard Domurath; Johannes Kutzenberger; Jörn Bremer; Ines Kurze; Albert Kaufmann; Jana Pretzer; Jens-Peter Klask; Birgitt Kowald; Christian Tiburtius; Klaus Golka; Sven Hirschfeld; Roland Thietje
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-02-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.