Literature DB >> 28706978

Impact of Conversion From Advagraf to Twice-Daily Generic Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study-A 3-Year Follow-Up.

Iolanda Godinho1, Maria João Melo1, João Gonçalves1, Marta Neves1, Alice Santana1, José Oliveira Guerra1, António Gomes da Costa1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28706978      PMCID: PMC5498016          DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Direct        ISSN: 2373-8731


× No keyword cloud information.
Tacrolimus is a key immunosuppression drug in solid organ transplantation with a narrow therapeutic index. Twice-daily brand tacrolimus Prograf to once-daily brand tacrolimus Advagraf conversion was proven to be safe as was Prograf to twice-daily generic tacrolimus (Sandoz).[1,2] Our group previously published the first study comparing the clinical outcomes of renal transplant patients switched from Advagraf to generic tacrolimus with good results at 9-month follow-up.[3] We sought to find if the conversion was still considered safe at 36 months. We included patients with stable renal function, serum creatinine less than 2.0 mg/dL, transplanted for 6 months or longer. Tacrolimus conversion was performed on a 1 mg:1 mg basis. Thereafter, doses were adjusted to maintain target trough levels between 5 and 10 ng/mL. Our main endpoints were patient and graft survival at 12, 24, and 36 months. Secondary endpoints included evolution of serum creatinine levels 36 months after conversion and biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes. From the 109 included patients, there were 99 active on tacrolimus at 36 months. Graft and patient survival was 100% at 12- and 24-month follow-up. At 36 months, death-censored graft survival was 93% and patient survival was 97%. There were 3 deaths with a functioning graft, 1 infectious, 1 neoplastic, and 1 cardiovascular, and 4 patients were transferred to hemodialysis due to chronic allograft dysfunction. Two patients transited to cyclosporine, for diabetes and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, and 1 to sirolimus due to Kaposi syndrome. The serum creatinine levels were not statistically different at conversion and 36 months follow-up (P = 0.737). There were no episodes of acute rejection. Doses were statistically different between conversion and 3 months (P < 0.001) and between 3 and 36 months (P < 0.001). Trough levels were not statistically different at conversion and 3 months (P = 0.595) but were between 3 and 36 months (P < 0.001) (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Summary of tacrolimus dose and trough levels and serum creatinine over the study period

Summary of tacrolimus dose and trough levels and serum creatinine over the study period In our study, the twice-daily generic formulation proved to be safe, with serum creatinine levels stable at conversion and at 36 months follow-up. The patients that transited to hemodialysis had been transplanted 10 years previously and were probably on a process of chronic allograft dysfunction at conversion. One third of our patients needed dose reduction at 14 days or 1 month after conversion to avoid toxicity, meaning that conversion was not on a strict 1 mg:1 mg basis in all patients, as suggested. On the other hand, this represented a great increase in the number of outpatient visits.[3] Statistically significant differences between tacrolimus doses and levels at 3-month and 36-month follow-up probably reflect a clinical tendency to lower trough levels of tacrolimus in renal transplantation that influenced our practice (trough tacrolimus levels 3-7 ng/mL).[4,5] Additionally, our study was limited by the small sample size, and the fact that it is a single-center study. In conclusion, the twice-daily generic tacrolimus seems to provide similar efficacy and safety to Advagraf at 36-month follow-up. Additional drug monitoring postconversion should be recommended because 1 of every 3 patients may require dose titration to avoid toxicity.
  5 in total

1.  Calcineurin inhibitor minimization in the Symphony study: observational results 3 years after transplantation.

Authors:  H Ekberg; C Bernasconi; H Tedesco-Silva; S Vítko; C Hugo; A Demirbas; R Reyes Acevedo; J Grinyó; U Frei; Y Vanrenterghem; P Daloze; P Halloran
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Impact of conversion from Advagraf to twice-daily generic tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center study.

Authors:  M J Melo; J Gonçalves; J O Guerra; A Santana; C Nascimento
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  The impact of conversion from prograf to generic tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplant recipients with stable graft function.

Authors:  J D Momper; T A Ridenour; K S Schonder; R Shapiro; A Humar; R Venkataramanan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Conversion of stable kidney transplant recipients from a twice daily Prograf-based regimen to a once daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen.

Authors:  R Alloway; S Steinberg; K Khalil; S Gourishankar; J Miller; D Norman; S Hariharan; J Pirsch; A Matas; J Zaltzman; K Wisemandle; W Fitzsimmons; M R First
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Low-target tacrolimus in de novo standard risk renal transplant recipients: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Elisabet Størset; Anders Åsberg; Anders Hartmann; Anna V Reisaeter; Hallvard Holdaas; Morten Skauby; Stein Bergan; Karsten Midtvedt
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.506

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.