Literature DB >> 28705577

Comparative Evaluation of Bladder-specific Health-related Quality of Life Instruments for Bladder Cancer.

Travis J Moncrief1, Priya Balaji1, Bruce B Lindgren1, Christopher J Weight1, Badrinath R Konety2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 bladder cancer-specific health-related quality of life instruments (HRQOL) in the same patient population. Previous HRQOL studies in cystectomy patients have yielded conflicting results. Using a cross-sectional study design, we examined the only 2 validated bladder cancer-specific (HRQOL) measures.
METHODS: Of the 256 patients who had undergone radical cystectomy from 2009 to 2014, 131 met both inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index (FACT-VCI) and Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) were mailed to these patients. Overall HRQOL and individual domain scores were compared between the 2 instruments with a Spearman correlation coefficient. HRQOL scores were compared by urinary diversion type as well using a non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test.
RESULTS: Our study had a response rate of 49% from 31 ileal conduit (IC) and 33 orthotopic neobladder patients. Overall, there was a moderate correlation between the FACT-VCI and BCI surveys (r = 0.57, P <.001). Responses on the BCI domains were strongly correlated with responses on the bladder cancer-specific domain of the FACT-VCI (r = 0.74, P <.001). The BCI scores for urinary function were significantly better in the IC group (P = .002). No significant difference was found between IC and orthotopic neobladder using the FACT-VCI.
CONCLUSION: The FACT-VCI and BCI instruments correlate well within the same patient cohort but capture different aspects of HRQOL. By focusing exclusively on bladder cancer treatment concerns, the BCI appears to be a better tool for assessing and counseling patients on expected treatment-specific changes after diversion type.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28705577     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Galsky; Arjun V Balar; Peter C Black; Matthew T Campbell; Gail S Dykstra; Petros Grivas; Shilpa Gupta; Christoper J Hoimes; Lidia P Lopez; Joshua J Meeks; Elizabeth R Plimack; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Neal Shore; Gary D Steinberg; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 13.751

2.  How to assess and improve health-related quality of life in bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Paolo Gontero
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-03

3.  Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

Authors:  Samantha J Mason; James W F Catto; Amy Downing; Sarah E Bottomley; Adam W Glaser; Penny Wright
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.588

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.