James A Kashanian1, Daniel J Mazur2, Marah C Hehemann3, Christopher D Morrison2, Daniel T Oberlin2, Valary T Raup4, Andrew W Choi2, Brian Trinh2, Mohammed A Said5, Mary Kate Keeter2, Robert E Brannigan6. 1. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 2. Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 3. Department of Urology, Loyola University Health System, Maywood, IL. 4. Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 5. Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 6. Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: r-brannigan@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of scrotal ultrasounds (US) conducted for scrotal or testicular pain and review the pathologic findings of orchiectomies done for lesions that were suspicious for malignancy on US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the indications and findings of all scrotal US completed at our institution from 2002 to 2014. If a patient underwent an orchiectomy for an intratesticular lesion that was concerning for malignancy on US, the pathology report was also reviewed. RESULTS: There were 18,593 scrotal US performed, with 7,668 (41.2%) conducted for scrotal pain. Of the US performed for pain, 80.4% revealed benign or normal findings, and only 2.2% demonstrated a finding that is an absolute indication for surgery (intratesticular lesion suspicious for malignancy 0.8%, abscess 0.7%, torsion 0.6%, infiltrative process such as lymphoma 0.1%). For those patients undergoing an orchiectomy, 75% had malignancy on pathologic analysis. CONCLUSION: The majority of the 7668 US performed to evaluate scrotal or testicular pain reveal normal or benign findings. A low percentage demonstrates a finding that necessitates urgent or emergent surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of scrotal ultrasounds (US) conducted for scrotal or testicular pain and review the pathologic findings of orchiectomies done for lesions that were suspicious for malignancy on US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the indications and findings of all scrotal US completed at our institution from 2002 to 2014. If a patient underwent an orchiectomy for an intratesticular lesion that was concerning for malignancy on US, the pathology report was also reviewed. RESULTS: There were 18,593 scrotal US performed, with 7,668 (41.2%) conducted for scrotal pain. Of the US performed for pain, 80.4% revealed benign or normal findings, and only 2.2% demonstrated a finding that is an absolute indication for surgery (intratesticular lesion suspicious for malignancy 0.8%, abscess 0.7%, torsion 0.6%, infiltrative process such as lymphoma 0.1%). For those patients undergoing an orchiectomy, 75% had malignancy on pathologic analysis. CONCLUSION: The majority of the 7668 US performed to evaluate scrotal or testicular pain reveal normal or benign findings. A low percentage demonstrates a finding that necessitates urgent or emergent surgery.
Authors: Jesse Ory; Udi Blankstein; Daniel C Gonzalez; Aditya A Sathe; Joshua T White; Carlos Delgado; John Reynolds; Keith Jarvi; Ranjith Ramasamy Journal: BJUI Compass Date: 2021-02-23