Literature DB >> 2870526

DNA and the neutral theory.

M Kimura.   

Abstract

The neutral theory claims that the great majority of evolutionary changes at the molecular (DNA) level are caused not by Darwinian selection but by random fixation of selectively neutral or nearly neutral mutants. The theory also asserts that the majority of protein and DNA polymorphisms are selectively neutral and that they are maintained in the species by mutational input balanced by random extinction. In conjunction with diffusion models (the stochastic theory) of gene frequencies in finite populations, it treats these phenomena in quantitative terms based on actual observations. Although the theory has been strongly criticized by the 'selectionists', supporting evidence has accumulated over the years. Particularly, the recent outburst of DNA sequence data lends strong support to the theory both with respect to evolutionary base substitutions and DNA polymorphism, including rapid evolutionary base substitutions in pseudogenes. In addition, the observed pattern of synonymous codon choice can now be readily explained in the framework of this theory. I review these recent findings in the light of the neutral theory.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2870526     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  29 in total

1.  Positional cloning by linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Nikolas Maniatis; Andrew Collins; Jane Gibson; Weihua Zhang; William Tapper; Newton E Morton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Recent development of the neutral theory viewed from the Wrightian tradition of theoretical population genetics.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Metabolic streamlining in an open-ocean nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium.

Authors:  H James Tripp; Shellie R Bench; Kendra A Turk; Rachel A Foster; Brian A Desany; Faheem Niazi; Jason P Affourtit; Jonathan P Zehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  There is no universal molecular clock for invertebrates, but rate variation does not scale with body size.

Authors:  Jessica A Thomas; John J Welch; Megan Woolfit; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution of coadaptation in a subdivided population.

Authors:  K Ryo Takahasi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Latent evolutionary potentials under the neutral mutational drift of an enzyme.

Authors:  Gil Amitai; Rinkoo Devi Gupta; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2007-05-21

7.  Compositional constraints and genome evolution.

Authors:  G Bernardi; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  In wheat ctDNA, segments of ribosomal protein genes are dispersed repeats, probably conserved by nonreciprocal recombination.

Authors:  C M Bowman; R F Barker; T A Dyer
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.886

9.  On the dynamics of neutral mutations in a mathematical model for a homogeneous stem cell population.

Authors:  Arne Traulsen; Tom Lenaerts; Jorge M Pacheco; David Dingli
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Determinants of DNA sequence divergence between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: codon usage, map position, and concerted evolution.

Authors:  P M Sharp
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.