| Literature DB >> 28705216 |
Hui Liu1, Zhida Chen1, Wenrong Zeng1, Yuanfei Xiong1, Yongzhi Lin1, Huacheng Zhong2, Jin Wu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fractures of the talar neck are relatively uncommon yet current interventions suffer from a high incidence of complications and poor functional outcomes. In the present study, we report a surgical treatment of Hawkins type III talar neck fracture through the approach of medial malleolar osteotomy and mini-plate for fixation and discuss the therapeutic effects after long-term follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Anatomical measurement; Hawkins’s classification; Medial malleolar osteotomy; Mini-plate; Talar neck fracture
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28705216 PMCID: PMC5512989 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-017-0610-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Detail information of the patients
| Variable | Result |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 12 (57.1%) |
| Female | 9 (42.9%) |
| Age (years) | 37.1 (range 21–53 years) |
| Causes of injuries | |
| Fall from height | 11 (52.4%) |
| Traffic accidents | 6 (28.6%) |
| Heavy object crushes | 4 (19.0%) |
| Associated injuries | |
| Ankle fracture | 3 (14.3%) |
| Calcaneal fracture | 2 (9.5%) |
| Open fracture | 1 (4.8%) |
| Follow-upa | 29.6 (range 18–41 months) |
aOne patient lost connection at 3-months follow-up.
Fig. 1Surgical procedure through approach of medial malleolar osteotomy and mini-plate for fixation (case 3). a Arc skin incision. b Exposure of malleolus medialis. c Preparation for medial malleolar osteotomy. d X-ray showing kirschner wire in good position. e Medial malleolar osteotomy was performed. f–g Talar neck fracture fixed with mini-screws and mini-plate. h–i Anterioposterior and lateral view of X-ray showing the screws and plate appropriately fixed
Clinical parameters of cases
| Clinical parameters | Result |
|---|---|
| Duration of surgery (minutes) | 65.6 ± 9.7 |
| Blood loss volume (ml) | 29.1 ± 5.7 |
| Bony fusion (months) | 3.7 ± 1.7 |
| Early complications | |
| Superficial infections | 1 (4.8%) |
| Partial wound dehiscence | 1 (4.8%) |
| Late complications | |
| Malunion | 1 (4.8%) |
| Complete necrosis | 5 (23.8%) |
| Partial necrosis | 8 (38.1%) |
| Talocrural arthritis | 13 (61.9%) |
| Subtalar arthritis | 14 (66.7%) |
| Talonavicular arthritis | 3 (14.3%) |
| Secondary procedure | 1 (4.8%) |
| Subtalar arthrodesis | 1 (4.8%) |
| Ankle arthrodesis | 1 (4.8%) |
| Total ankle replacement | 1 (4.8%) |
| Pedicled periosteum flap | 1 (4.8%) |
| VAS score | 3.2 ± 1.1 |
| AOFAS hind foot score | 79.8 ± 17.3 |
| Hawkins score | 11.4 ± 3.4 |
| Excellent | 9 (43.0%) |
| Good | 4 (19.0%) |
| Fair | 4 (19.0%) |
| Poor | 4 (19.0%) |
Fig. 2Representative images of case 7 (a 49-year-old male patient with a right ankle injury due to a fall from a 4 m height). a–c X-ray, CT, and 3D reconstruction before operation. d–e Anterioposterior and lateral view of X-ray at 7 days after operation. f–g Anterioposterior and lateral view of X-ray at 6 months follow-up. h–i MRI at 2 years follow-up. Talocrural arthritis and partial AVN of the talar bones were observed. j pronation/oblique (canale) view of X ray at 3 years follow-up. k–l Anterioposterior and lateral view of X-ray at 3 years follow-up. m–n Satisfactory range of ankle motion was achieved at 2 years follow-up
Fig. 3Examples of images obtained from case 18 (A 23-year-old female patient with a right ankle injury due to heavy object crushes). a–b Anterioposterior and lateral view of X-ray before operation. c–d CT and 3D reconstruction before operation. e–f X-ray at 7 days after operation. g–h Anterioposterior and lateral view of X-ray at 6 months follow-up. Subtalar arthritis was obviously seen. i MRI at 1 year follow-up. Talocrural and subtalar arthritis were obviously seen. j Canale view of X ray at 1 year follow-up
Fig. 4Anatomical measurement of 3D reconstruction of injured and corresponding uninjured talus. a Digitalized 3D reconstruction of talus and baseline plane location: transverse section, coronal plane, and sagittal plane. b Determination of the length of the talus. c Determination of the width of the talus. d Determination of the height of the talus. e Determination of the anterior and posterior width of the trochlea of talus. f Determination of the height of the trochlea of talus and the length of the trochlea of talus. g Determination of the length of medial malleolar facet. h Determination of the length of lateral malleolar facet
The measurement results of the talus ( ± s, n = 19a, mm)
| Item | Injured | Uninjured |
|---|---|---|
| The length of the talus | 50.4 ± 3.6* | 51.2 ± 3.8 |
| The width of the talus | 41.8 ± 2.9* | 41.0 ± 3.1 |
| The height of the talus | 29.6 ± 2.7* | 30.2 ± 3.3 |
| The anterior width of the trochlea | 28.1 ± 2.9* | 27.3 ± 2.5 |
| The posterior width of the trochlea | 22.9 ± 2.8* | 22.6 ± 2.3 |
| The height of the trochlea | 9.4 ± 1.6* | 9.8 ± 1.2 |
| The length of the trochlea | 33.0 ± 3.9* | 32.4 ± 2.9 |
| The length of medial malleolar facet | 38.1 ± 4.3* | 37.6 ± 3.6 |
| The length of lateral malleolar facet | 37.9 ± 5.2* | 37.1 ± 4.4 |
*p > 0.05
aOne patient lost connection at 3-months follow-up, one patient with bilateral talus fracture