| Literature DB >> 28705166 |
Sonja Caffe1, Marina Plesons2, Alma Virginia Camacho3, Luisa Brumana4, Shelly N Abdool4, Silvia Huaynoca5, Katherine Mayall6, Lindsay Menard-Freeman7, Luis Andres de Francisco Serpa8, Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de Leon9, Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli10.
Abstract
Adolescent fertility rates in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) remain unacceptably high, especially compared to the region's declining total fertility rates. The Region has experienced the slowest progress of all regions in the world, and shows major differences between countries and between subgroups in countries. In 2013, LAC was also noted as the only region with a rising trend in pregnancies in adolescents younger than 15 years. In response to the lack of progress in the LAC region, PAHO/WHO, UNFPA and UNICEF held a technical consultation with global, regional and country-level stakeholders to take stock of the situation and agree on strategic approaches and priority actions to accelerate progress. The meeting concluded that there is no single portrait of an adolescent mother in LAC and that context and determinants of adolescent pregnancy vary across and within countries. However, lack of knowledge about their sexual and reproductive health and rights, poor access to and inadequate use of contraceptives resulting from restrictive laws and policies, weak programs, social and cultural norms, limited education and income, sexual violence and abuse, and unequal gender relations were identified as key factors contributing to adolescent pregnancy in LAC. The meeting participants highlighted the following seven priority actions to accelerate progress: 1. Make adolescent pregnancy, its drivers and impact, and the most affected groups more visible with disaggregated data, qualitative reports, and stories. 2. Design interventions targeting the most vulnerable groups, ensuring the approaches are adapted to their realities and address their specific challenges. 3. Engage and empower youth to contribute to the design, implementation and monitoring of strategic interventions. 4. Abandon ineffective interventions and invest resources in applying proven ones. 5. Strengthen inter-sectoral collaboration to effectively address the drivers of adolescent pregnancy in LAC. 6. Move from boutique projects to large-scale and sustainable programs. 7. Create an enabling environment for gender equality and adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent pregnancy; Equity; Latin America and the Caribbean
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28705166 PMCID: PMC5512880 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-017-0345-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Fig. 1Percentage of females 15–19 years old who had begun childbearing by education level in selected LAC countries, 2008–2015
Fig. 2Percentage of females 15–19 years old who had begun childbearing by wealth quintile in selected LAC countries, 2008–2015
Percentage of adolescent mothers by age groups, place or residence, and indigenous or non-indigenous origin in the census of selected Latin American countries
| Country and date of census | Age group | Percentage of adolescent mothers | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indigenous | Non-indigenous | ||||||
| Urban | Rural | Total | Urban | Rural | Total | ||
| Brazil, 2010 | 15–17 years | 10.6 | 22.9 | 18.7 | 6.4 | 8.6 | 6.8 |
| 18–19 years | 26.8 | 46.9 | 39.4 | 18.2 | 26.6 | 19.5 | |
| 15–19 years | 17.0 | 31.6 | 26.4 | 11.1 | 15.2 | 11.8 | |
| Costa Rica, 2011 | 15–17 years | 8.5 | 20.3 | 17.0 | 5.3 | 6.7 | 5.7 |
| 18–19 years | 23.6 | 42.1 | 36.1 | 17.0 | 22.2 | 18.4 | |
| 15–19 years | 15.2 | 28.7 | 24.7 | 10.0 | 12.6 | 10.8 | |
| Ecuador, 2010 | 15–17 years | 9.0 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 8.3 | 11.9 | 9.6 |
| 18–19 years | 28.9 | 34.2 | 32.9 | 25.2 | 34.1 | 28.1 | |
| 15–19 years | 17.4 | 18.5 | 18.3 | 15.0 | 20.3 | 16.8 | |
| Mexico, 2010 | 15–17 years | 6.3 | 7.4 | 6.9 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 6.0 |
| 18–19 years | 23.4 | 27.4 | 25.3 | 20.6 | 25.8 | 21.6 | |
| 15–19 years | 13.2 | 14.8 | 14.0 | 11.6 | 14.2 | 12.2 | |
| Panama, 2010 | 15–17 years | 16.9 | 20.5 | 19.6 | 5.7 | 8.9 | 6.7 |
| 18–19 years | 38.8 | 54.2 | 49.7 | 19.1 | 28.6 | 21.7 | |
| 15–19 years | 26.0 | 32.4 | 30.7 | 11.3 | 16.2 | 12.7 | |
| Uruguay, 20,100 | 15–17 years | 6.0 | 4.1 | 6.0 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| 18–19 years | 20.2 | 25.8 | 20.4 | 16.9 | 21.9 | 17.1 | |
| 15–19 years | 11.6 | 12.5 | 11.6 | 9.3 | 11.3 | 9.4 | |
Jorge Rodriguez Vignoli. La reproducción en la adolescencia y sus desigualdades en América Latina. Introducción al análisis demográfico, con énfasis en el uso de microdatos censales de la ronda de 2010. CEPAL, UNFPA, 2014
Examples of interventions to improve contraceptive access and uptake by adolescents across the ecological frameworka
| Level of ecological framework | Examples of intervention |
|---|---|
| Individual | - Educate adolescents about contraception |
| Relational | - Encourage and support communication on contraception between couples, within and outside unions. |
| Community | - Build community support for contraceptive provision to adolescents |
| Societal | - Legislate access to contraceptive information and services |
aThese evidence-based interventions are taken from WHO’s Guidelines for preventing early pregnancy and poor reproductive outcomes to adolescents in developing countries