| Literature DB >> 28705149 |
Tomoharu Tokutomi1,2, Akimune Fukushima3,4, Kayono Yamamoto1,2, Yasushi Bansho5, Tsuyoshi Hachiya6, Atsushi Shimizu6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Tohoku Medical Megabank project aims to create a next-generation personalized healthcare system by conducting large-scale genome-cohort studies involving three generations of local residents in the areas affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake. We collected medical and genomic information for developing a biobank to be used for this healthcare system. We designed a questionnaire-based pedigree-creation software program named "f-treeGC," which enables even less experienced medical practitioners to accurately and rapidly collect family health history and create pedigree charts.Entities:
Keywords: Biobank; Family health history; Family tree; Genetic counseling; Genome cohort studies; Interview sheet; Pedigree; Primary care; Questionnaire; Software
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28705149 PMCID: PMC5512935 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-017-0433-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Fig. 1Information entry screen of f-treeGC; information for three generations is required to create the pedigree (a). The genealogical information requested includes name (b, u), age (c, d), gender, general status [affected (i, j, k), asymptomatic/presymptomatic carrier, carrier, or deceased], infertility status, pregnancy status, fetal status, and disease status (m, n, o, p, q, t) of individuals belonging to three generations. In addition, client, proband and birth order information, including multiple gestation (e, f), custody (g), multiple individuals (h), donor or surrogate, adoption, and consanguinity (l) information may be inserted. The chart-creation process is visible for inspection on the lower left side of the f-treeGC screen in real time (r). A multiple-choice questionnaire for genetic information is filled out by an interviewer or the client; then, f-treeGC automatically creates a pedigree chart (r, s, t, v, w)
Fig. 2Fictitious pedigrees created by f-treeGC. a Fictitious ultimate pedigree, b A hypothetical pedigree representative of a family with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome shown in Fig. 1, partially modified from Bennett et al. [1, 7]. The clients are included in the 2nd generation (a) or in the 3rd generation (b) upon confirmation at system startup
Correspondence table of f-treeGC
| Client has a child | Client has NO children |
|---|---|
| Client (consultand) couple | Parents of client |
| Children of client couple | Client (consultand) |
| Husband’s (his) parents | Paternal grandparents |
| His siblings | Paternal uncles/aunts |
| His paternal uncles/aunts | Siblings of paternal grandfather |
| His maternal uncles/aunts | Siblings of paternal grandmother |
| His divorced partners | Divorced partners of father |
| Wife’s (her) parents | Maternal grandparents |
| Her siblings | Maternal uncles/aunts |
| Her paternal uncles/aunts | Siblings of maternal grandfather |
| Her maternal uncles/aunts | Siblings of maternal grandmother |
| Her divorced partners | Divorced partners of mother |
Fig. 3Foldable interview sheet named “f-sheet”. a Large sheet, b gathered interview sheets for each individual, and c accordion-folded sheet. In diagram (a), the dashed-dotted lines, “-・-・-・-・-”, and broken lines, “- - - - -”, show the mountain fold and the valley fold, respectively
Fig. 4Overlay function of f-treeGC for consanguinity; a pedigree before (a) and after (d) overlay; the interview sheets of the wife (b, e) and a first cousin (c, f)
Comparison of the pedigree symbols used
| Pedigree software packages | f-treeGC | PedigreeXP | Progeny Free Online Pedigree Tool | Genial Pedigree Draw | My Family Health Portrait |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 1.01 | 2.1.0.169 | Not described | 2.0 | 3.4 |
| Standard pedigree symbolsa | |||||
| Name of proband/consultand | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Family names | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Historian | Yesb | No | Yesb | No | No |
| Date of intake/update | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
| Reason for taking pedigree | Yesb | No | Yesb | No | No |
| Ancestry of both sides of the family | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Age | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Generation numbered with Roman numerals I, II, III, etc. | Yes | Yes | Yesb | Yesb | No |
| Individual numbered 1, 2, 3, etc. | Yes | Yes | Yesb | Yesb | No |
| Individual | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Affected individual | Yes | Yes | Yesd | Yes | Yes |
| Affected individual (> one condition) | Yesc | Yesc,d | Yes | Yes | No |
| Multiple individuals, number known | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Multiple individuals, number unknown | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Deceased individual | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Consultand | Yes | No | No | Yes | No |
| Proband | Yes | Yesd | Yesd | Yes | No |
| Stillbirth (SB) | Yesb | No | No | No | No |
| Pregnancy (P) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Spontaneous abortion (SAB) | Yes | Yes | Yesd | Yes | No |
| Affected SAB | Yes | Yes | Yesd | No | No |
| Termination of pregnancy (TOP) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Affected TOP | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
| Ectopic pregnancy | Yesb | Yesb | No | Yes | No |
| Relationship line | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A break in relationship line | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Divorced partner | Yese | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Consanguinity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Multiple gestation, monozygotic | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Multiple gestation, dizygotic | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Multiple gestation, unknown | Yesb | No | Yesb | No | No |
| Multiple gestation, trizygotic | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Family history not available/known for individual | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| No children by choice or reason unknown | Yes | No | Yes | Yesd | No |
| Infertility | Yes | No | Yes | Yesd | No |
| Adoption | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yesd |
| Ovum or sperm donor | Yes | No | No | Yes | No |
| Surrogate (gestational carrier) | Yes | No | No | Yes | No |
| Evaluation | Yesb | Yesb | Yes | Yesb | No |
| Carrier | Yes | Yesd | Yesf | Yes | No |
| Asymptomatic/presymptomatic carrier | Yes | No | No | Yes | No |
| Uninformative study | Yesb | Yesb | Yesb | Yesb | No |
| Affected individual with positive evaluation | Yesb | Yesb | Yes | Yesb | No |
aBennett et al., 2008 [2]
bBy using “Remarks”, “Comment”, “Notes”, or “Annotated Text”
cUp to four conditions
dDifferent symbols used from the recommended common pedigree symbols
eLimited to three individuals (consultand couple with children, or parents of consultand without children)
fBy using “Apply symbols”
f-treeGC information
| Provenance | Academically developed |
| Tool URL | http://www.iwate-med.ac.jp/hospital/clinics/medical/m26/ |
| Target clinical population | Primary care and specialty |
| Family history information - source | Multiple sources |
| Family history information - data format | Both structured and free text |
| Family history information - analysis | Manual |
| Result recipients | Clinician |
| Data storage | Store in the original format file |
| Discrete data integration readiness | Application programing interfaces (API) |
| Consent documentation | Implied consent only |
| System features - platforms | Windows and Macintosh |
| Built in Adobe Air | |
| System features - architecture | Stand-alone |
| System features - security | Password security protection |
| Read-only mode | |
| Standard pedigree symbols | Fully compliant |
| Other functions | Custody |
| Pregnancy with twins or multiples |
Comparison of pedigree scores and creation time for each factor
| Factors | Median (Range) |
|
| Statistics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method (manual method vs. f-treeGC software) | Manual | f-treeGC | Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test | |||||
| Score (%) of both scenarios | 59.5 | (23.7) | 86.4 | (25.8) | 0.00019 | *** | 18 | |
| Score (%) of scenario D | 58.8 | (14.7) | 86.8 | (16.2) | 0.00769 | ** | 9 | |
| Score (%) of scenario P | 60.2 | (23.7) | 86.0 | (25.8) | 0.00742 | ** | 9 | |
| Order of scenarios (D to P vs. P to D) | D to P | P to D | Mann-Whitney U-test | |||||
| Score (%) of scenario D by the manual method | 55.9 | (11.8) | 61.0 | (14.7) | 0.32312 | 5 × 4 | ||
| Time (sec/individuals) of scenario D by the manual method | 42.5 | (18.8) | 25.9 | (12.5) | 0.01390 | * | 5 × 4 | |
| Score (%) of scenario P by the manual method | 60.2 | (11.8) | 57.5 | (23.7) | 1.00000 | 5 × 4 | ||
| Time (sec/individuals) of scenario P by the manual method | 26.7 | (16.3) | 28.8 | (33.3) | 0.32516 | 5 × 4 | ||
| Score (%) of scenario D by f-treeGC | 83.8 | (16.2) | 87.5 | (13.2) | 0.61980 | 5 × 4 | ||
| Time (sec/individuals) of scenario D by f-treeGC | 65.0 | (49.4) | 61.9 | (23.4) | 0.46243 | 5 × 4 | ||
| Score (%) of scenario P by f-treeGC | 86.0 | (25.8) | 87.6 | (8.5) | 1.00000 | 5 × 4 | ||
| Time (sec/individuals) of scenario P by f-treeGC | 46.7 | (25.4) | 51.5 | (44.3) | 0.32719 | 5 × 4 | ||
| Order of scenarios (1st vs. 2nd) | 1st | 2nd | Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test | |||||
| Score (%) by the manual method | 55.9 | (23.7) | 60.3 | (14.7) | 0.44127 | 9 | ||
| Time (sec/individuals) by the manual method | 40.0 | (37.5) | 26.7 | (19.2) | 0.01086 | * | 9 | |
| Score (%) by f-treeGC | 83.9 | (18.9) | 86.8 | (25.8) | 0.67840 | 9 | ||
| Time (sec/individuals) by f-treeGC | 59.2 | (65.6) | 50.4 | (38.5) | 0.13864 | 9 | ||
| Qualification (nurse vs. clerk) | Nurse | Clerk | Mann-Whitney U-test | |||||
| Score (%) by the manual method | 61.0 | (23.7) | 54.1 | (17.2) | 0.13339 | 12 × 6 | ||
| Time (sec/individuals) by the manual method | 30.8 | (40.8) | 26.3 | (45.4) | 0.67310 | 12 × 6 | ||
| Score (%) by f-treeGC | 86.4 | (17.2) | 86.8 | (25.8) | 0.85103 | 12 × 6 | ||
| Time (sec/individuals) by f-treeGC | 57.1 | (53.1) | 39.4 | (47.9) | 0.18955 | 12 × 6 | ||
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001
Comparison of pedigree scores using f-treeGC with or without f-sheet
| Factors | Median (Range) |
|
| Statistics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group (TT vs. TS) | TT | TS | Mann-Whitney U-test | |||||
| Score (%) of scenario D | 89.7 | (10.3) | 87.5 | (26.5) | 0.0196 | * | 23 × 24 | |
| Score (%) of scenario P | 88.8 | (24.5) | 92.3 | (17.3) | 0.0109 | * | 23 × 24 | |
| Scenario (D vs. P) | D | P | Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test | |||||
| Score (%) of group TT | 89.7 | (10.3) | 88.8 | (24.5) | 0.6922 | 23 | ||
| Score (%) of group TS | 87.5 | (26.5) | 92.3 | (17.3) | 0.0018 | ** | 24 | |
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01